Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
A Syrian child waits to return to his country with members of his family at the Turkish border crossing with Syria AP / Press Association Images
AP / Press Association Images / Press Association Images
NEWS THIS WEEK of a potential ceasefire in the Syrian Civil War was met with approval from the international community.
On Friday, world powers agreed to a ‘cessation of all hostilities’ to begin within a week’s time.
However, before this was announced, Aleppo in northern Syria had been making international headlines all week.
Here, we take a look at what’s going on there? Why is it significant? Who are the key players and what does this mean for the wider Syrian conflict as well as nearby Turkey and Europe?
The Syrian province and city has been the centre of a struggle between rebels and government forces for the past four years, as both try to gain control of the once prosperous area.
The province of Aleppo has been a rebel stronghold for the past number of years. Last week, the Syrian Government, backed by Russian air bombardment and a number of other key players, launched a massive assault on the northern province.
Why is Aleppo important?
The city of Aleppo is the capital city of the northern Aleppo province. It is the ‘second city’ of Syria (after Damascus), and its old city district (which has been mostly destroyed in the war) is a UNESCO World Heritage site. Before the civil war started, it was called the commercial capital of Syria.
For 18 months after the beginning of the civil war, Aleppo managed to avoid the conflict which had engulfed the rest of Syria since it began in March 2011.
However, in July 2012, fighting broke out there between the rebel groups and the forces of president Bashar al-Assad.
A building destroyed by an airstrike in Aleppo Associated Press
Associated Press
Since then, the city has been subjected to intense battles, with government forces controlling the western half of the city and the rebels controlling the east.
The city and surrounding towns had long-been a stronghold for more moderate Syrian rebels supported by Turkey, as well as Kurdish militia groups and some more extreme armed groups.
Militants from the Islamic State group used to control several neighborhoods in Aleppo, but they were forced out by other rebels in early 2014.
The city is close to Turkey, which is sympathetic to the rebels. This has enabled rebels to receive much-needed supplies from across the Turkish border. This, as well as its status as the second capital of Syria, make it a key position to hold.
Why is Aleppo in the news again?
On Monday, 1 February Syrian government forces, strongly backed by Russian air-strikes, Iranian forces and other militias, launched a major offensive on the northern province, sending tens of thousands of people fleeing for the nearby Turkish border and seriously impacting the wider civil-war.
By that Saturday, the rebels’ main supply route into Aleppo city was cut off by government forces, leaving those left in inside virtually surrounded and isolated from any support.
Rebel opposition forces and some 350,000 civilians inside Aleppo city now face the prospect of a government siege, a tactic that has been employed to devastating effect against other former rebel strongholds.
The city of Homs that was re-taken by government forces in 2014 after a lengthy siege Associated Press
Associated Press
Russia entered the conflict on the side of the government in September. Since then it has helped government forces recapture territory and has backed ground movements by Assad’s forces.
Russia has been criticised by the United States and others for focussing attacks on the more moderate Syrian rebels instead of Islamic State. Now, it would seem as though the combined might of both forces is working.
Advertisement
In a series of reports from the frontline, international medical organisation, Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), condemned the pro-government bombing campaign.
The organisation said that in the smaller city of Azaz, just north of Aleppo, the health system is close to collapse, as tens of thousands flee towards the border with Turkey.
MSF is also warning that relief agencies will not be able to handle the increase in displaced people.
“The camps have no capacity to take in new arrivals,” said Muskilda Zancada, MSF Head of Mission in Syria.
There is a risk that people, including young children and the elderly, could be stuck living in the open in freezing conditions, for several days at least. We expect that there could be severe health effects, and pneumonia is a big concern.
Recently Turkey have also started a bombing campaign against the Kurdish YPG in Aleppo.
What does this mean for Syria?
Many commenters believe that the government turnaround in Aleppo could be the turning point in the civil war, with reports that it could be the greatest victory for government forces since the conflict began.
With their main supply route with sympathetic Turkey cut off, and their base effectively surrounded, the rebels are staring down a long and gruelling defeat.
With Aleppo under its control, the Syrian government will consolidate its grip on the west coast of Syria – by far the more economically powerful area of the country.
Islamic State will still control large swathes to the north and east, but for the more moderate rebels – backed by the US and Europe – this could spell the end.
“The trajectory for the rebels is downwards, and the downward slope is increasingly steep,” Emile Hokayem, senior fellow at the International Institute for Strategic Studies, told AFP.
What will this mean for Europe?
As the campaign in Aleppo province began, tens of thousands of civilians fled from their homes and began to amass on the Turkish border. At least 50,000 people are now thought to have fled their homes since 1 February, with over 500 people dead.
A Syrian man tries to stay warm with a fire at a camp near the Bab al-Salam border crossing with Turkey, Associated Press
Associated Press
Turkey has always maintained that it has an open-border policy for people fleeing the conflict, but has kept its doors closed as it attempted to figure what the do with the new refugees.
While Friday’s announcement of the cessation of hostilities was welcomed, cracks are already beginning to show in the plan, with Bashar al-Assad swearing to retake all of Syria with his campaign – including areas controlled by the Islamic State.
MSF has welcomed news of the ceasefire, but said that much had to be done for the people suffering in Syria.
“Any agreement to provide more humanitarian assistance is desperately needed. Syrians living under bombs and in fear need to see the agreement move from paper to reality,” said Jane-Ann McKenna, Director of MSF in Ireland.
As the battle rages in Aleppo, it is triggering another great movement of people in the direction of Europe, which took in over 500,000 Syrians last year.
Greece is already overwhelmed with refugees coming in from Turkey. And a number of EU countries have openly baulked at the idea of taking in more people.
As the push continues from Syria, only time will tell what course of action Bashar al-Assad’s and Russia’s forces will take now that they’ve surrounded Aleppo.
Either way, this shift in the battle of Aleppo will have a huge effect on the course of the civil-war, as well as on the fate of Syria more generally.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
Our Explainer articles bring context and explanations in plain language to help make sense of complex issues.
We're asking readers like you to support us so we can continue to provide helpful context to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay.
Why are we so interested in Hungarian education policy?? Why don’t we sort out our own issues.. children’s hospital, housing crisis, hospital waiting list, reopening the country and then start pointing fingers… or is this just a distraction from what a bad job they are doing
@Padjo Mulk: Where was/is the moral bravery needed by our government to tackle the homelessness crisis and rid us of the vultures/ cuckoo’s? Coveney and Co jumping on a populist bandwagon, “hey, look over there”.
@Padjo Mulk: Becasue its wrong. Because its all over Europe right now. Just becasue we have problems here, doesnt meant we ignore human rights violations, unjustice and bigotry elswhere in the world. We either have moral standards or we dont. And we a people voted by a huge majority to give equal rights to all citizens, and stand up for those rights in the face of those who would deny them. So yes, we should voice our discontent whenever we can, against the type of behaviour the Hungarian government are showing.
@Barry Sorensen: what about financial equality? Should the 99% be on par with the 1%. I wonder if that was solved would it have a positive impact on other forms of equilty.
@Padjo Mulk: the subtlety of deflection almost caught me too. The irony is that tou comment is just a distraction from the from the subject matter of the article – human rights in Hungry -
@Will: we all have the same rights when born, and opportunities to educate and earn are equal. There is nothing in the state laws that prevents anyone joining the 1% – and Robin Hood is long gone and replaced by social welfare which takes from those with more and gives to those with less. This policy many agree with and there is no law that prevents anyone joining the 1% and every effort is made to ensure equal opportunity to all.
@Will: Two very different issues. Human rights – the right to exist in a free society, free from bigotry, feee from persequetion, the freedom not to be denied existence or understanding through education – is very different from having everyone on a financial par. I assume you are not suggesting that eveyone has the same take home pay nomatter what they do? That will never happen.
Basic human rights should not be a political football in any country.
@Niall Ó Cofaigh: well yes what you are saying is correct to some degree. I’m of the view the game is rigged and the 1% never loose. That’s been very evident in times of financial hardship.
@Mark Behan: No, but that doesnt mean we hide away in a box and ignore the outside world either. We are not putting funds into fixing Hunagarian law. We are speaking out against what we believe is wrong.
@Padjo Mulk: why are you saying that we can’t be interested, have an opinion or care about the wrongs all over the world. What is wrong with you? Go out and do something about it instead of being a Karen here in the journal. Cop on to yourself.
@Barry Sorensen: well that would be pure equality if all were paid the same regardless of what they do. Perhaps this is the way it will be in the future for the 99%. Right now we have various groups fighting for equality and I just wonder if this will create such division that in 20 years rights will not exist and we all will be kept humans. Technology is playing a key role in this of course. I don’t know but my opinion is that this is being carefully guided behind the scenes. Anyways who knows what the future will bring.
@Padjo Mulk: Hungary is a sovereign state and entitled to pass its own laws to deal with what is a tricky situation. It cannot contravene E U law but that remains to be seen. . While i agree that our leaders might be seen to be hypocritical they see this as a no lose position and our health service etc is not relevant to this issue
@Padjo Mulk: Ah look. A fake account engaging in whataboutery. Of course it’s not homophobic at all. At least these types know to keep hidden. The day they do this openly will be the wake up call
@Padjo Mulk: Of course it’s not a matter of one or the other. They can do all the things you listed and they are doing them. The vaccine progamme is going very well. Housing is the big one but they are working on it.
Hungary needs to be called out. The EU has standards that must be upheld.
@Terry O Sullivan: the suppression of human rights is “a tricky situation”? It’s very interesting that a book about The Madness of Crowds written by a right wing provocateur doesn’t have a single mention of the far right in it but instead has four subjects; Gay, Gender, Race, and Trans. Surely just a coincidence, surely.
@Dave O’Keeffe: well I believe it’s not straightforward. You believe calling something a human right stops all debate about the issue,but that approach doesn’t work outside of certain parts of Europe and even there is disputed. Your attack on Murray is just ad hominem and of no consequence to me
@Terry O Sullivan: ad hominem? I literally criticised his work. Unless you think the term right wing provocateur is an attack? What is it that has been declared a human right that you don’t think is straight forward?
@Terry O Sullivan: the right wing provocateur title is well earned by Murray with headlines such as “Wokeism has infected our universities and schools- its an insidious movement” in which he…. condemns the teaching of Britain’s colonial past and “Cancel culture is an ugly intolerant trend that insists everyone has to think the same” in which he seeks to cancel the people that disagree with him
@Ally Mc Culladgh: Exactly and I hope this isn’t just a popularity sound bite. Let’s hope he also follows through and takes up the issue of Qatar holding the World Cup. Considering how they treat members of the LGBT+community.
@Sazzle: His role is fairly evident in his job title like. A foreign affairs minister focusing on Ireland would be neglecting their literal purpose in Government.
@Kevin Organ: What is happening in Hungary with the LGBT community is truly awful and yes he is minister for foreign affairs but when he was Minister for housing he neglected his duties entirely so I do think its fair to point that out.
Wasn’t their government democratically elected? They have the European Parliament to discuss these issues democratically and on a European level. Hungary’s Domestic policy is of no business of ours.
@Sean McCarthy: So we should turn a blind eye to human rights abuses and infringements coming from a country that we effectively share a federated state with?
@Kevin Kilcoyne: why is it a human rights issue.
Young people the world over are being influenced from a young age, sometimes being pressurised to identify themselves as something they may not be.
Let our children grow up and stop trying to put them in boxes
@Sean McCarthy: Actually, it is. As an EU member state, Hungarians have the right to travel, live and work in any EU country without harassment. That right needs to be reciprocated. If LGBT EU citizens cannot feel safe in Hungary because of their domestic policy, then they cannot stay in the EU. So yes, it is very much our business.
@Sean Barry: Shaming children for something they can’t change about themselves is psychological child abuse. It can leave a lifelong legacy of issues. Laws like this contribute to an atmosphere of toxic shame. That’s why it’s a human rights issue. Awareness an acceptance of gay people in educational settings is not ‘pressurising someone to identify as something they’re not’. Shaming gay children does precisely that – generations of children in the past, and especially under laws like this, have felt the pressure to pretend to be something they’re not.
@Sean Barry: 100% agree with you but this law is a hard sell for me, particularly because it is so intricately bound up with the Orban govt, which is both authoritarian and corrupt.
@Sean McCarthy: wrong. I’m happy to see the EU flag fly along side ours because the EU stand for certain values that Poland and Hungary no longer uphold. If their not happy with EU values they should get back behind the “iron curtain ” where their values are better aligned.
@gofreak: to make this issue out to be one of simple shaming is absurdly reductionist. If your 4yo tells you he wants to be a tree, do you immediately dispense with all his human trappings and plant him in the garden? Of course not. Young children are immensely impressionable and if you start entertaining the idea that the feelings they have might mean that they are eg the wrong sex they will probably go along with it. It’s my job as a parent to guide my children along the most trodden path and if they turn out to be gay or trans later on then so be it, but I wouldn’t want propagandists like Nickelodeon planting confusion in their minds right from the start.
@Pablo: ah you say that but you’ll still child proof your house for when he ‘thinks for himself’ that it’s a good idea to poke the electrical sockets with a fork! It’s your job to guide in the early years, and if you’ve done your job right they can find their own path with whatever accumulated wisdom you’ve managed to pass on along the way.
@Squarepeg01: People do not turn out to be gay or trans because of Nickelodeon, but they might hate themselves a little less for being who they are because of it, than they will being brought up by an ignorant, judgemental tightass who expects them to follow the ‘most trodden path’ and blames entertainment for what nature made them.
@Squarepeg01: What are you even talking about? This isn’t a question of prohibiting schools from ‘forcing children to be gay’ per your tree analogy. When it comes to how schools engage around sexualities, they’re not forcing children to ‘be’ something just because the child might think they are something or not. This about prohibiting schools offering any positive affirmation or depiction of homosexuality. You’re pretending that children one day ‘later on’ – when they’re no longer children? – become gay. That’s not how things work. People become aware of their sexuality and attraction at school going ages. What Hungary’s law is prohibiting is gay children seeing any positive affirmation of their being, unlike their straight peers – by making that verboten, it implicitly sends the message to those kids that there’s something wrong about what they are. That IS a matter of shaming. Is there anything in this bill to outlaw homophobia or disapproval of homosexuality in schools? No. This isn’t a neutral bill that simply aims to take any questions of sexuality out of schools. It is designed to remove precisely and only any affirmation of sexualities other than heterosexuality, by implication sending a direct message to gay kids in those schools that they’re on their own, and something to be swept under the carpet. I experienced this same kind of thing first hand – I remember a Monseigneur coming around our religion class, and imploring any gay students not to come out until after they had left school. The effect this had on the gay kids in the school was enormous, two of them were effectively run out of the school because the school turned a blind eye to their bullying. You are advocating the same in supporting laws like this.
@David F. Dwyer: you don’t know why people turn out to be trans, or homosexual for that matter. You’re just mouthing the shibboletha of your progressive ideology. Some kids are probably born that way, some may come from troubled backgrounds and interpret the angst they feel as
being in the wrong body because that interpretation is a high status idea in today’s world. Constant affirmation will re-enforce that idea – like Charlize Theron, for instance, calling her son a girl just because he declared himself one – at 3yo! Many of the trans kids pay a hefty price later on when their biology reasserts itself after they’ve outgrown their phase, and they want to detransition. Where’s your concern for those?
@gofreak: the law is also about protecting children from porn and paedophilia, so you’re wrong that it targets only LGBT issues. I don’t support the law, as it so happens, as you’d know if you’d read one of my earlier comments – I don’t like the use of draconian measures to tackle complex social issues. But nor do I think presenting sexuality to schoolkids is as cut and dry as you suggest. My analogy was meant to suggest that kids think they’re all kinds of fantastic things and it’s the job of the adults in the room to treat what they say in a measured way. I don’t want gay kids or trans kids to feel shamed or isolated but I’m afraid if they really are gay or trans they are inevitably going to experience some angst because most people around them will not be the same as them.
@Sean D: the national socialist party was indeed democratically elected. Hitler then was given sole power by the Kaiser which enabled the the dictatorship under the banner of the Nazi’s which carried out horrendous crimes. Democracy seems to be very selective to some cohorts. Most people say they are in favour of democracy but what they really mean is All opinions matter but only if they are the same as mine.
@Squarepeg01: Let them keep the bits about porn and pedophilia then. The bits people are protesting are around any positive portrayal of homosexuality, or non-heterosexuality. Just to pick up on a comment you’ve made elsewhere about 3 year old kids and trans issues – Hungarian schools haven’t been transitioning kids between genders on the whim of 3 year olds, and oh, now here’s a law to stop that. That’s not what this is about. This is a law that rubber stamps homosexuality etc. as too dangerous for children to be aware of, to push any positive portrayal of homosexuality into adult-only arenas – out of schools, beyond the broadcast watershed etc. You note that some kids ‘are probably born that way’ – accepting that, if you see your society rejecting a state of your being as undesirable if not dangerous, if you see laws rubber-stamping that, what do you think that does for your mental health, as a child growing up? Would you wish that on one of your own children if they were gay? I see in your latter post that you don’t want gay kids to feel shamed or isolated, but the aspects of the law people are protesting will do exactly that. It’s a terrible abuse IMO. I can only hope Hungarian gay kids who today are probably petrified of what’s happening around them can take some little solace in the fact that others around the world are speaking out. That’s the point of Michael Martin etc. speaking up.
@Squarepeg01: “you don’t know why people turn out to be trans, or homosexual for that matter.” I can tell you for one thing, Cartoon Network didn’t make me who I am. Did you turn out to be straight because television told you who you were?
Spare me the typed effluvia about gender, I’m not interested.
@Bala mc blaha: we have just had a case finish in our court’s relating to an abortion which should never have happened. It would not have happened but for the repeal of the eight amendment. So we are in no position to point at any other country.
@Liam Mernagh: you can live in a fairytale world where gay school students don’t exist if you wish. Forgive others if they don’t want to sacrifice the mental health of those children on the altar of your homophobic vanity, in which you pretend they don’t exist. You’re happy for children to know about sexuality as long as it’s not ‘off the wall’ per your definition. Homophobia through and through.
@Dave O Keeffe: not at all. If Ireland are trying to enhance relationships with the likes of China do you really think they are bringing up real human rights injustices taking place there?
@Tom Rooney: the EU was created to make European countries more reliant on each other economically so that it would be more devastating for one european country to declare war on another on the aggressor, and less war means less poverty for authoritarians, ie, Mussolini, Hitler, to gain support
Yet Ireland and the rest of the Euro will gladly participate in the Winter Olympics in China. We would gladly participate in the World Cup in Qatar, and our government wouldn’t say a peep. Funny how that works
@Seán Dillon: this only became political when politicians got involved. A member of the Hungarian government appealed for UEFA to ban Neuer from wearing a rainbow armband. UEFA denied the request and affirmed that Pride is inclusive and not political. Then a politician requested that UEFA light up a stadium in rainbow colours and they rejected that appeal also.
Nine comments on here before and they chose to attack the Taoiseach or the Minster of foreign affairs and ask what about our own problems. None of them appeared to be concerned about the gradual erosion of LGBT rights in Hungary. None of them even mentioned the issue
Coveney we know your advisor is some DCU woke lunatic. How about sticking to try to do a job in Irish politics for a change instead of looking for petty woke points from God knows who ever gives a dam when we want to watch a soccer match. Hungry has there laws but out.
@Sam Harms: OK minister for foreign affairs. His job is to have international relations with foreign countries in the interest of Ireland and it’s inhabitants. Also to regulate passport control and promote native Irish abroad and promote Irish values….I’m sorry Sam since when was t Ireland’s interest or value to support LGBT at a non political sporting event. Not every single Irish person has these valued. Also Hungary has autonamy to enforce laws they vote on. As an Irish citizen I’m not sure talking about primary school kids about LGBT stuff yet there too young. That’s my values and I’m not alone. Spot bullying UEFA it’s a sporting organisation not a gay pride parade
@Henry: it’s for anyone under 18 . . You think a young adult is too young to be trusted with educational material?? This isn’t about primary school kids, it’s about eroding rights from a certain section of society and is wrong.
@Henry: Are primary school kids too young to know about straight stuff? About the bible? About crucifixion? About disability? You don’t give primary school children enough credit if you think they cannot process that some people aren’t attracted to the opposite sex and that that is OK. They’re learning about all kinds of things and usually don’t have nearly the same problem processing new information as adults. These are not questions of values, they’re questions of reality. You are also being extremely arrogant to think your children will think the same way you do about these things. If one of your children is gay, and was growing up in Hungary, they’d be growing up under a law that classifies an inherent aspect of their being, something they’re becoming aware of as they grow up, as too dangerous for any positive characterization, too dangerous for pre-watershed exposure. Under laws that characterise their state as a negative social influence. What kind of effect do you think that would have on your child growing up? Do you think it would make your gay child straight? Would that be the hope? Because it wouldn’t. It would simply make them miserable, and compound whatever negativity I’d venture to guess they’d experience at home under your parenting.
If the German Authorities had put in a simple request to light up the stadium with the rainbow colours for Pride Month it may have got approval but once the Munich mayor said they wanted it done to get back at Hungary then UEFA were snookered and couldn’t approve it as they would then be taking one political stance over another. Just because the majority of us agree with the proposal this time doesn’t mean we will the next time so they were right to stay out of it.
@William Tallon: What is not hard to pin down are certain rights, such as that EU citizens have the right to travel, live and work in any EU country without harassment. If LGBT EU citizens cannot feel safe in Hungary because of this law, then it contravenes EU membership.
@David F. Dwyer: If the Hungarian parliament has done anything illegal in EU law by passing this legislation then a case can be taken against it in the European Court of Human Rights and rightly so. Bringing a case on the grounds of not feeling safe would seem a futile exercise to me. There seems to be a very great desire on the part of many to punish the Hungarian people for having a conservative and therefore ‘wrongthink’ outlook and continuing to elect Viktor Orbán as they have a right to do. Trying to bully them into submission seems a negation of their rights and will ultimately be counterproductive as it will lead to resentment and an increase in homophobia. But as I said it seems more about punishment than genuinely changing attitudes…
@William Tallon: Of course it would seem futile to you, but then you’re not affected by it, are you? You’re not going to face legally backed harassment if you visit a certain country where you should be entitled to the same rights as you would in your own. Hungary wanted to join the club, then they have to act like decent human beings and treat people with dignity and respect. If they passed similar laws about any religion or race there wouldn’t be any argument about ‘punishing’ them, they’d be told to knock it on the head or get out.
@David F. Dwyer: Futile in terms of a basis for legal proceedings as in the definition of futile which is ‘incapable of producing any useful result; pointless…’ Courts judge cases on law not on the basis of emotions like fear. Why are you directing your ire at me? I’m not Hungarian nor do I support the stance of the Hungarian government. I simply observed that many people want to see the Hungarian people punished for their views. I didn’t say I supported those views. It seems to me that you too want them punished and that you’re demanding that they should view people and the world as you do. You sound quite authoritarian actually, which is ironic. Maybe a little less emotion on your part would help you focus somewhat more clearly on what I said and not on what you think I said.
@William Tallon: No sir, you missed the point. Hungary joined the EU and are a net beneficiary of it but have passed a law that discriminates against certain citizens. Individual views are not important, it’s a law that has actual consequences- if an LGBT EU citizen were to travel to Hungary for whatever reason and subjected to prejudice that the law there not only backed but enforced such as refusal of accommodation or goods and services just because of who they are, or actual harassment or abuse for say, public displays of affection- that’s the matter. I don’t care how they view people, but passing laws that strip away peoples’ rights is another matter entirely.
@William Tallon: One more thing, don’t ever patronise me. I didn’t call you prejudiced and I don’t appreciate unsolicited advice about how much emotion to show on a topic. How I feel about anything or express myself is none of your business.
@David F. Dwyer: A very immature, over-emotional and more than a tad contradictory comment there. If how you feel about anything or express yourself is none of my and presumably anybody else’s business then why are you expressing your feelings on a public forum like the Journal where you’re bound to get responses that you may not like? Pointing these things out to you is not patronising you. It’s ‘stating the bleedin’ obvious’ as the saying goes. Hopefully at some point you’ll realise that many people in this world do not think like you and that they will not change their views to accommodate you. People you don’t even know will hate you just because you exist. Life is tough. Life will be very unfair at times. If you can’t change certain things then learn to deal and live with them…
@David F. Dwyer: As I’ve said if they’ve broken any EU laws then they should be rightly taken to court. Your assertion that they’ve stripped people’s rights is for the courts to decide. Asserting something doesn’t make it true no matter how much you want it to be. If on the basis of the evidence presented they are found to have done so they should be sanctioned accordingly. It’s called due process. You unfortunately sound like someone who doesn’t believe in the concept…
@William Tallon: Stick to the issue sir, and do not get personal. A public forum is for discussing public matters, not your opinion of other commentators.
@David F. Dwyer: I find most of what you have to say rather contradictory and lacking in logic. What’s with the ‘sir’ affectation by the way? Weird! Also I think you’ll find that the word is ‘commenter’ and not commentator if you care to check it out. Anyways, I have more interesting things to do than joust with annoyingly self-absorbed people like yourself. Stay safe, stay angry and carry on posting those heartfelt if decidedly over the top comments and childish responses…
I fail to see how it’s a fundamental right to have LGBT mentioned in educational materials. Maybe Hungarian parents don’t want their kids learning about that in school.
@whitewater: It’s a fundamental right for people – and young people – not to be shamed, implicitly or explicitly, for something they cannot change, to be made to feel undignified about an innate characteristic. These laws turn homosexuality into a taboo topic – suggesting it’s something to be suspicious of, something dangerous, something other that shouldn’t be accepted, something undignified – or even something to be reviled. If I turned around and made a law and said that – for example – religion was to be banned in schools, banned before the watershed, not to be promoted, I would rightly be accused of being hateful and infringing on rights. Even moreso if I targeted a particular religion. It’s even truer of something even more innate, in sexuality. A teacher would technically not even be able to defend a child from homophobia in a school setting for fear of promoting homosexuality under these laws.
@whitewater: because not teaching children about accepting LGBTQ people breads homophobia simple as. If we get thought straight relationships are normal but non heteronormative are not when we are young that’s a mindset that gets imbedded and it’s not so easy to get out of that mindset especially in a country where those running it are clearly homophobic.
As much as I dislike Martin, I really appreciate his stance on this. It’s really important to be vocal and add pressure on countries that chip away at LGBT rights, especially those in the EU.
I grew up with hardly a mention of gay people in Dublin. The mental strain of hiding yourself is unbearable.
Why? Why shouldn’t kids learn about the realities of life? Oh hang on… Let’s teach them about imaginary brings instead and tell them they are under constant surveillance instead! That’ll teach em!
I do not agree with Hungary’s laws and treatment of minority rights. However, the present government has been democratically elected, and I question the right of another government to attack the internal politics of a foreign sovereign country. It is precisely the reason why the United Kingdom chose to leave the EU.
Orban is running out of scapegoats, he needs to keep the culture war going-first immigrants than thinly disguised anti-semitism in the guise of Soros now gay rights.
Populist playbook needs to blame the “other” to hide their own failings.
@Valthebear: Not sure about public cases where gay teachers were fired, but people certainly were fired under the provisions that were knocked down in 2015 – an unmarried mother most famously – the same provisions under which gay teachers could have been fired by Catholic schools. The threat was perceived as real enough to keep most in the closet – most gay teachers wouldn’t come out and risk being fired in the first place.
Poland and Hungary deserve sanctions but they will always veto everything against each other. Rules need to change so two dictatorships can’t veto the will of all of Europe
Some grade A whataboutism going on in the chat tonight. Yeah this country has problems so does every other country in the world so if that disqualifies us from saying anything about any other country then no country would be allowed to say anything at all, and human rights abuses would just be ignored by the wider world. They passed a similar law in Russia and now there’s concentration camps for gay people in Chechnya so that is the precedent we’re dealing with on this issue, no EU member state should be okay with anything like that possibly happening within an EU country or any kind of country. So yeah we have problems here but that shouldn’t stop us from having opinions on important issues
Mark Rutte …. and expel Spain as well as Hungary for their brutal treatment of EU citizens in Barcelona in 2017 – should not be tolerated by any civilised society. Out Out Out.
French court bans far-right leader Marine Le Pen from running for office over embezzlement case
Updated
27 mins ago
28.8k
Courts
Young man jailed for eight years over murder of Thomas Dooley
30 mins ago
861
Dublin
Mother and son face losing home after change to tenants scheme
17 hrs ago
63.8k
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 161 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 110 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 143 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 113 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 39 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 35 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 134 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 61 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 88 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say