Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

File photo of Jared Lee Loughner. AP Photo/U.S. Marshal's Office

Arizona shooting suspect back in court for mental health hearing

Jared Lee Loughner is accused of a gun attack in Arizona which killed six people and seriously injured US Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords.

THE MAN ACCUSED of wounding Rep Gabrielle Giffords in the deadly shooting rampage in Tucson, Arizona was quiet and emotionless and mostly sat still during a federal court hearing on his mental health.

It was a stark contrast from Jared Lee Loughner’s last court appearance. During that 25 May hearing, Loughner had to be removed from the courtroom by federal marshals because of an angry outburst.

Dr Christina Pietz, a psychologist who has been treating Loughnerat Springfield, Missouri prison facility, testified yesterday that his improved demeanour is a sign he can be made competent to stand trial within the next eight months.

‘Progress’

US District Judge Larry Burns also cited Loughner’s behaviour in ruling there’s a substantial probability Loughner’s mental health can be restored. Burns noted at the end of Wednesday’s hearing that Loughner had, for once, paid attention to the proceedings.

“There’s reason to be optimistic he will recover and be able to assist in his case,” the judge said. “The court finds that measurable progress has been made.”

Earlier in the hearing, Loughner looked thin and pale and was wearing a white T-shirt and khaki-colored prison pants. He had closely cropped hair and sideburns, and his wrists and ankles were shackled.

As the hearing dragged on, Loughner swivelled back and forth in his chair at times, and sighed as the talk turned to video surveillance of the shooting and later his delusions. But for the most part, he sat still and expressionless.

Experts have concluded Loughner suffers from schizophrenia, and prosecutors contend he can be made competent with more treatment. But Loughner’s attorneys argue prosecutors have failed to prove that it’s probable his condition will improve enough.

Disputing evidence

Pietz said that when Loughner first arrived at the Missouri facility, he was convinced Giffords was dead, even though he was shown a video of the shooting.

“He believed it had been edited” by law enforcement, Pietz said.

Now that the 23-year-old is being forcibly medicated with psychotropic drugs, “he knows that she [Giffords] is alive.”

“He is less obsessed with that,” Pietz testified. “He understands that he has murdered people. He talks about it. He talks about how remorseful he is.”

Pietz added Loughner now makes eye contact with people and no longer has the inappropriate smirk seen at previous court hearings, which she described as a symptom of his mental illness. Burns also noted the absence of a smirk in issuing his ruling.

Loughner has pleaded not guilty to 49 charges stemming from the 8 January shooting that killed six and injured 13, including Giffords.

Pietz noted  Loughner remains on suicide watch but is no longer having auditory hallucinations. Extending his stay at the Missouri facility by eight months will give him enough time to become mentally fit for trial, she told the judge.

“He has already made improvements, and he has only been on medication for 60 days,” she said. “Given the progress he has made today, I have no reason to think he wouldn’t continue to make progress.”

Less than an hour into the 25 May hearing, Loughner lowered his head to within inches of the courtroom table and then lifted his head and began a rant. “Thank you for the free kill. She died in front of me. Your cheesiness,” he said, according to court transcripts. Federal marshals whisked him from the courtroom, and he watched the rest of the hearing on closed-circuit TV from a separate room.

The judge required Loughner’s presence at today’s hearing, even though his lawyers objected and argued travelling would be disruptive for their mentally ill client. Loughner wanted to attend so he could see his parents, who live in Tucson and were at the hearing.

Burns on Wednesday decided to extend Loughner’s stay at the Missouri facility for four months, adding that he would have to see more “measureable progress” before he could add more time. Burns also ruled that officials can continue medicating Loughner based on the prison’s finding that he’s a danger to himself.

Prison officials began forcibly medicating Loughner after concluding at an administrative hearing that he posed a danger at the prison. Loughner’s lawyers have been seeking to have the judge, rather than the prison, decide whether Loughner should be medicated.

Loughner was first forcibly medicated between 21 June and 1 July, but an appeals court temporarily halted the medications after defence lawyers objected. The forced medication resumed 19 July after prison officials concluded his psychological condition was deteriorating, noting he had been pacing in circles near his cell door, screaming and crying for hours at a time.

Defence lawyers have repeatedly asked Burns and a federal appeals court to halt the forced medications.

Loughner’s  medications include the sedative Lorazepam, the antidepressant Wellbutrin and Risperidone, a drug used for people with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and severe behaviour problems.

If Loughner is later determined to be competent enough to understand the case against him, the court proceedings will resume. If he isn’t deemed mentally fit at the end of his treatment, Loughner’s stay at the facility can be extended. There are no limits on the number of times such extensions can be granted.

If doctors conclude they can’t restore Loughner’s mental competency, the judge must make another decision. If he finds there’s no likelihood of Loughner being restored to competency, he can dismiss the charges. In that case, state and federal authorities can petition to have Loughner civilly committed and could seek to extend that commitment repeatedly.

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds