Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
BANK OF IRELAND has apologised after there was a delay in some of its customers being paid their wages.
Several people took to Twitter to vent their frustration at the situation, saying it had led to direct debits for mortgages and other bills failing to be made.
Advertisement
A spokesperson for the bank confirmed some customers “experienced a delay in receiving credits to some accounts earlier”.
However, they said the bank had “worked on this as a priority and all processing is now up to date”.
On Monday, Bank of Ireland had to resolve a technical glitch that lead to its debit cards not working in some stores.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
The hypocrisy is what’s wrong with it Larry. it’s not ok for a person to take the life of another but it is perfectly acceptable for the state to do the same and experiment with new drugs in the process?
At least 4.1% of inmates on Death Row are innocent, 1 in 25.
Gross, S.R., O’Brien, B., Hu, C. & Kennedy, E.H. 2014. Rate of false conviction of criminal defendants who are sentenced to death. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 201306417, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1306417111.
At least 4.1% are NOT innocent. . If it was known that someone was innocent they wouldn’t be in prison at all, let alone on death row. It’s impossible to predict how many are (if any) with the 4.1% figure being based upon (amongst a few other factors) the amount o exonerated convictions between 1974 and 2004.
In any case, DNA evidence is primarily used in cases such as rape. The death penalty is largely used in cases of homicide to which DNA evidence is not usually primary factor. As both cases involved rape, DNA evidence was most likely used so one can probably safely assume that these men were in the 96% of correctly convicted criminals on death row.
David, you’ve contradicted yourself – 4.1% “are” innocent according to the best possible “estimates”.
4.1% are estimated to be innocent – that is different to what you have said. It is also admitted by the persons that did that study that it is almost impossible to predict whether that figure is true or not.
“At around 10:30 p.m. on June 3, 1999, Bobby Bornt was asleep on the couch at his house in Perry, Oklahoma, when his front door was kicked in. Three men, Clayton Derrell Lockett, Shawn Mathis and Alfonzo Lockett, entered his house and immediately started beating and kicking him. Bornt recognized Lockett because Lockett had recently covered a tattoo for him. Lockett was carrying a shotgun which he used to hit Bornt. After the beating, Bornt’s attackers used duct tape to secure his hands behind his back and they gagged him and left him on the couch while they ransacked the house looking for drugs. As Bornt lay restrained on the couch his friend, Summer Hair, approached the open door. She was pulled inside, hit in the face and thrown against a wall. One of the men put a gun to her head and ordered her to call to her friend, Stephanie Neiman, who was outside sitting in her pickup. When Stephanie came inside, they hit her several times to get the keys to her pickup and the code to disarm the alarm on her pickup. The men put all three victims in the bedroom where Bornt’s nine-month old son, Sam, had been sleeping. Alfonzo Lockett came into the bedroom and got Summer. He took her into the bathroom where he made her perform oral sodomy on him. He then took her into Bornt’s bedroom where he told her to get undressed and he raped her. When he was finished, he left her there and Lockett came into the bedroom. He raped her vaginally and anally and he made her perform oral sodomy on him. When he was finished, he told her to get dressed and she went back into Sam’s bedroom with the others. Alfonzo Lockett came into the bedroom and used duct tape to secure Summer’s and Stephanie’s hands behind their backs. He also put tape across their mouths. Lockett instructed Mathis to look in the garage for a shovel. When he returned with a shovel, the victims were loaded into Bobby Bornt’s and Stephanie Neiman’s pickups. Bornt and his son were placed in his pickup with Lockett. Summer and Stephanie were placed in Stephanie Neiman’s pickup with Mathis and Alfonzo Lockett. They took off driving with Lockett in the lead. They left Perry and drove to a rural area in Kay County. Lockett stopped on a country road where he got out of the pickup he was driving and went over to Stephanie Neiman’s pickup. He made Summer get out and go with him to a ditch where he raped her and forced her to perform oral sex on him. When he was finished, he took her back to Bornt’s pickup. While Summer was sitting in the pickup, Mathis got her and took her back to Stephanie Neiman’s pickup where he made her perform oral sex on him. He grabbed her head and said, “In order for you to live, this is what you have got to do.” While stopped on the country road, Lockett told Mathis to get the shovel and start digging. When Mathis was digging in the ditch, Bornt heard Lockett say, “Someone has got to go.” Stephanie was taken to the hole dug by Mathis and Lockett shot her. The gun jammed and Lockett came back up to the pickup to fix it. While he was doing this, Bornt could hear Stephanie’s muffled screams. When the gun was fixed, Lockett went back down to the ditch and shot Stephanie again. While Mathis buried Stephanie’s body, Lockett and Alfonzo Lockett warned Bobby and Summer that if they told anyone they would be killed too. They then drove both pickups to another location where they left Stephanie’s pickup. All of them rode back to Bornt’s house in his pickup. Lockett, Mathis and Alfonzo Lockett dropped off Bornt, his son and Summer Hair at Bornt’s house and they left in Bornt’s pickup. The following day, Bobby Bornt and Summer Hair told the Perry police what had happened. Stephanie Neiman’s pickup and her body were recovered and Lockett, Mathis and Alfonzo Lockett were subsequently arrested. Lockett was interviewed by the police three times. The first time he terminated the interview and asked for an attorney. He later reinitiated the interview and although he denied shooting Stephanie Neiman during the second interview, he confessed to having killed her in a third interview.”
I think it’s ok when you compare the stats. 100% of victims of murder are innocent vs 4% on death row!!! Those who think we should not risk executions for the 4% don’t value life.
That’s one way of looking at it I suppose. I don’t know enough about he death penalty system to discuss whether it’s ethical, legal murder etc I just know that if someone committed those crimes on one of mine that I’d be happy enough with this outcome
As would I Nikki but there is a huge difference between justice and revenge. The problem I have with it is Murder is Murder, what’s the difference if it’s done on the street or in an institute by so called “guardians”
To be perfectly correct David, it isn’t the US who put this man to death. It was the state of Oklahoma. Each one of the states in the US is technically its own nation with its own set of laws, police forces, court systems and constitution. Therefore the US as a whole had very little to do with this.
That being said, 4% of those put to death being innocent is simply too high of a number for petty revenge. Thankfully we don’t have the death penalty here.
Well it’s the norm for the US to torture prisoners and kill and maim innocent civilians. The killing of their own citizens is barbaric. But the US are good at it. Look at Guantanamo and the torture.
Not entirely true David. There are a lot of commonalities between all the states in the US and they all fall under the power of Washington and the US Supreme Court. Obviously they can make their own laws but every citizens rights are guaranteed under the American constitution, not individual states.
I feel no sympathy for the convicted killer but what purpose is served by killing him? Rotting in prison for the rest of his life is more appropriate punishment. The death penalty might give us a sense of revenge but it has no effect on crime stats.
“Warner was convicted for the 1997 rape and murder of an 11-month-old girl.”……………..Now how could we ensure all executions went the same way and not the peaceful “off to sleep” their lawyers are clambering for.
Costs a lot to keep a prisoner cost less in the long run to kill him particularly if he deserves it like these two did for their heinous crimes. I am of the mind nobody should be put to death without DNA evidence or video evidence.
They don’t rot in prison, thats the problem. It looks pretty cosy what with all the TV’s, books, gyms, sporting courts, cards etc available to them. One big hangout with all their mates, all funded by the taxpayer.
We are so quick to demand the execution of an animal when it attacks a human but not so for when human beings commit atrocities against others.
If they really were condemned to hard time: tough physical work of digging holes and filling them over and over again or breaking bigger rocks into pebbles, for each and every single day remaining in their lives to earn their food and spartan living environment (they shouldn’t be simply handed these luxuries) I would feel more satisfied in seeing life in prison given over execution for these subhumans. They are a waste of oxygen.
A recent report says that about 4% of those on death row in the USA are innocent.
In recent just over 1% of death row prisoners were exonerated or had their sentence commuted. That leaves an awful lot of innocent people murdered by the state in pursuit of your ‘eye for an eye’ policy.
If the UK hadn’t abolished the death penalty the Birmingham Six and Guilford four would be dead by now.
Not really Jackie That is the fundamental principle of shariah law. A guy blinded another in one eye in Iran and the court ruled that he must be blinded in one eye. A woman was disfigured in an acid attack in Pakistan and the court ruled that the attacker must have acid thrown at him in the same way. And even in Iran, the family of a murder victim may trade execution by the State for blood money from the perpertrator.
I don’t agree with the death penalty at all and after reading the first part of the article that me makes more certain. However after reading what they did I’m very torn. imagine if they did that to a loved one? Monsters killing monsters.
@sean yes thanks Sean after several comments correcting those of us who misread it we have reread and commented accordingly as you will see when you read the remaining commenta
Anyone who regards that as just is a sick individual no matter what they were convicted of. You are confusing barbarous revenge with justice, they are not the same.
Capital punishment is barbaric… End of. These people have committed terrible crimes but committing another crime for the sake of vengeance is not the answer. Capital punishment does not work as a deterrent and resolves no issues for the victims of the crimes and does nothing for society.
Eye for an eye in my opinion. Plus, if you commit a crime than is deserving of execution then you know what, society and the human race don’t need you. So I say, good riddance!
Nothing for society except the saving of thousands of tax dollars and the absolute removal of a dangerous threat. ‘End of’ is a weak thing to put after an opinion in any argument.
Capital punishment doesn’t work. It has no real effects on the rate or type of crimes being committed. It is based on the naive presumption that if people know they may face the death penalty it will deter them from committing the crime. It doesn’t work. The type of person who commits the type if crimes indicated in this article doesn’t think like a rational person to begin with. Moreover many death penalty crimes are committed in circumstances where rationality is the last thing that the person committing the offence is thinking of. I believe that he fact that the death penalty is not a deterrent is now widely accepted. Hence the main argument for the death penalty is revenge i.e. an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth. Very Old Testament. Not surprising in the good old US of A where so many people take the Bible literally and believe that the world was created in 4004 BC. The same mentality exists in Iran but from a different albeit similarly fundamentalist religious perspective.
We may have kicked the Catholic Church off its pedestal in Ireland but apparently the mentality of judgementalism and emotionalism apparently remains firmly embedded in the Irish psyche especially in some who would otherwise decry religion. The only thing the death penalty does is coarsen society and if you want an example then follow what is happening in the USA where such attitudes are rampant and reflect Old Testament thinking masquerading as Christianity.
Winston how does an execution save society money, the NY Times costed an execution at US 25 Million to the tax payers as the state has to pay for the legal process.
The average annual cost of keeping someone in prison in the USA according figures published by each individual state is $25,000, or $1 million for 40 years vs 25 million to execute a prisoner.
Haha no it doesn’t it. If it did states that practice capital punishment would have a lower incident of crimes that qualify for such punishment.
Like in other countries where you get your hand/arm cut off for stealing, or perhaps take Texas with extremely high rate of capital punishment, yet there crime statistics are not reduced. It only serves to appease your twisted sense of justice.
“Oh that person was killed horribly, so lets’s make that one die horribly too”
The only other place I see support for CP is on the Daily Mail, and other right-wing pseudo-journalistic rags.
It does not save money Winston and there are certain absolutes one of which is that the death penalty is barbaric whether it be by beheading with an axe or the injection of a cocktail of drugs in a quasi medical setting or the shooting of a wounded man bound to a chair or the hanging of a woman for having an abortion or the electrocution of bank robber or the stoning to death of a woman for adultery. An eye for eye would leave the whole world blind.
It rids society of them and hat has to be a good thing. No chance of them getting out on parole and having the opportunity to rape or murder more innocent people
Nikki, what if they turned out to be innocent, like Johnny Garrett was after he was executed? Your arguments are only valid in a perfect system, which we definitely do not have.
Eric – That was a completely different case. Garrett was not proven innocent albeit he always professed he was. The case has come in to question due to cold case DNA evidence that suggests that it was not him.
In this case DNA evidence was available and the rapist/killer also admitted his guilt. What more do you want?
Personally speaking, if there is any chance of an innocent person dying then that is enough for me to oppose the death penalty. I oppose the finality of it.
I also oppose it on the grounds that by executing criminals we are going to their level. Society should hold itself to higher standards that the criminals it abhors. Capital punishment is fighting fire with fire at best and an indulgence of the darker side of human nature at it’s worst. As evolved and civilised people we should be able to rise above the primal voice baying for blood when we have been wronged.
I would imagine most offenders re-offend so at least less innocent people get hurt in the future. Not a perfect system but at society has no place for men such as these.
It’s not revelling, he got what he deserved, you can’t behave worse then an animal and then cite your human rights particularly when you’ve so barbarically taken away someone else’s , that kind of logic is worthy of a Darwinian award and is the reason criminals laugh at our justice system
So human rights are conditional? That’s a slippy slope my friend. Human rights aren’t necessary when all is rosy in the garden, it is only in situations where there is imbalance, such as prison or a tyranny, that they become important. As disgusting as this mans actions are, his human rights must be observed
Also, judging by the stats criminals are laughing at the justice system irrespective of whether capital punishment is in place or not. What is the point if it is not acting as a deterrent? Your Darwin Award quip is misplaced and ill thought out.
Teach a person not to kill by killing them. Ya that’s logical. Not. Captical punishment is a bit like gang land murders. Yes when it’s gang land murder we call it murder. How is that different just because the state dose the killing? The person been executed has family to how is that far on them. The parent who unconditionaly love’s their children. Does the state have the right to muder that child. Yes I said child. We are all a child in the loving eyes of loving parents.
This was almost certainly allowed to occur on purpose – otherwise quickly putting a mask over his mouth with standard hospital anaesthetic gas would have rendered him unconscious!
Legal murder in the form of the death penalty is never right.
I consider this a good news story that he suffered greatly just like his victim, the other guy raped and murdered an 11 month old baby , come on do gooders and explain why he has rights and should not suffer .
I personally hope that the child killer dies a horrible slow death .
Pretty horrific. While what he did was absolutely evil and he deserves life in prison on hard labour on minimal food and water, he did not deserve a botched execution! Those on death row should be given a choice of method: shooting, hanging, electrocution, gas chamber or injection. I reckon most would chose to be shot or hung.
Give them a choice how they die that is a ridiculous statement I may not 100% agree with capital punishment but certainly don’t think that an animal who rapes and murders an 11 month old should be allowed to choose.
@kerry yes Kerry I read your previous comment directed at me stating the same thing and responded accordingly. Very worrying that you seem to be condoning the rape beating and murder of an innocent woman yet you are protesting against the perpetrator dying in pain? Is there a particular reason for this?
@nikki cop on, Kerry isn’t ‘condoning rape or anything of the kind. Objecting to the death penalty does not mean you endorse the crime that was committed by the perpatrator.
I didnt say I disagreed with the death penalty for such horrific crimes. I said he didnt deserve a botched execution.
My preference would be to leave them in solitary confinement without sunlight for ten years on minimal nutrition. Then present them with a rope after ten years. I imagine most would take their rotten lives to escape.
@james Kerry’s words were “he committed a HORRIBLE crime but he was MURDERED BARBARICALLY. Easy to read between the lines there and see which event she finds worse no?
Legal murder or not if he had carried that crime out on someone in my life I would find it very hard to feel sorry for him. I’m sure there are many better people than me who would find it in their hearts to forgive him but I just don’t think I could. Wouldn’t be a big supporter of the death penalty because of so many false/wrong convictions but reading cases like these makes it hard
I don’t feel anything for him. Just can’t work out why use untested drugs. Why not just tell him what was in the needle. What’s the big deal?
Only reason I disagree with death penalty is a really simple one. It doesn’t deter anything. It’s a money saver. Simple as that.
Nikki, how would you feel if someone was put to death for a crime committed against a friend or family member of yours only for it later to be found through new evidence that the person put to death was in fact innocent? That happens all too often when it comes to the death penalty.
He didn’t deserve a botched execution but you would happily torture him for ten years to the point that he would take his own life? Bit of a contradiction there Conor…
(Not that I care though. He was convicted of the rape and murder of 19-year-old girl, who was buried alive. It short – fcuk him)
The death penalty cannot be reversed. Life imprisonment can. To sentence the death penalty is to assume perfection in all the parties involved. And judging by the amount of innocents that have been executed, we are nowhere near that perfection. People support the death penalty because it appeals to their primitive nature, and as a species we revel in the chance to indulge or primitive urges.
In these cases both men have admitted guilt, I don’t support the penalty in that the hope prisoners suffer but in such cases where guilt is admitted or proven beyond a shadow of a doubt (is video evidence etc), then for me life imprisonment doesn’t cut it. I’ve defended lethal injection on here before and I’ve obviously been wrong believing it to be painless, but I’d still stand by the punishment
@ Kev – these vermin should be given a pair of New Balance shoes, shorts and let run free in the desert…………..with the US military 5 minutes behind in helicopter gunships…………now that would be the proper way to do it.
He raped a young woman, beat her and buried her alive? He got off light with the heart attack. No wonder the world is the way it is when some people have pity on this animal. To all the people that think it was wrong what happened to him – if the victim was your sister or your mother would you be so sympathetic?
Ummmm….. The specific effect of potassium chloride is to stop the heart from beating, they use it to stop the heart for transplant and valve surgery in hospitals over the world daily.
Why the tone of surprise and implication that a heart attack was completely unsuspected?
I think the circumstance that it took 40 minutes rather than being instantaneously is the issue.
The combination, respectively order of sedative, anaesthetics and then the lethal works just the same when putting animals to sleep but is generally without a struggle.
I’m Muslim countries it’s the religion that kills!! It’s totally wrong when someone gets killed for been raped!! The guy above was not raped and a religion is not killing him the law of the land is. So bringing sharia law in to the same line as this is wrong, and in sharia law the man who was executed last night would not have been sentenced to death because he is a man. So how is it similar?
Are you just ignorant or stupid Jackie? Sharia law is commonly applied to non-Muslims in the Muslim world. And this includes women being murdered for being raped as this is deemed to be adultery. The word of a woman you see is not equivalent tot the word of a man and women who are sexually assaulted are routinely executed, jailed or physically abused. Read a bit before you comment so ignorantly. In Iran if someone kills a member of your family you even get the choice of killing them in a similar fashion – literally an eye for an eye. It would appear that many posting here harbour similar views. Ironic really as I suspect that many of them would consider themselves committed secularists. It just goes to show that the attitudes which underlie fundamentalist religions can just as easily transfer to secular societies and rear their ugly heads. It’s easy to knock religion of its perch; it’s much handler to challenge your own attitudes and open your own heart. The posts here simply indicate that in many respects the judgemental attitudes that gave us the Magdalene Laundries and the endemic sexual abuse of children haven’t changed in the slightest despite the change in packaging. If you want to know why Ireland isn’t changing that much despite all that is happened and the toppling of so many authoritarian institutions you need look no further than so many of the unthinking and revealing expressions of opinion in this article.
It is the State Jackie, and on the same logical basis as you propose. Someone commits a terrible crime, then the State must kill them. That is your logic.
What I am saying is sharia law is barbaric!!! It’s not just about an eye for an eye!!! But executions should be in every country for the likes of the men above, like the guy who raped them 2 innocent kids last year., he deserves hanging for it. Where people are getting that I support sharia law is far from the truth.
The usual do-gooders whining about “murder by the State” etc. If you do what either of these guys did then you’re not a human being and don’t deserve to be treated as one. Anyone capable of carrying out such an atrocity has no right to live. End of.
You and everybody else who says an eye for an eye is a supporter of Shariah law. That is what Shariah law says about criminal justice. Painting people who oppose the death penalty as having sympathy or pity for the criminal or as condoning what they did or of having a bleeding heart is also bullshit. I think these people are monsters and need to be removed from society and deserve no sympathy. But killing them does not make everything okay. The surviving family may feel they have justice for a fleeting moment but they will be tortured forever by the loss of their loved one. Killing him does not erase what happened. And it does nothing for society – it further brutalizes society and makes murder acceptable – someone who already faces the death penalty, if they are thinking straight and not off their heads on drugs may well say, hey I have already crossed the line so maybe I will have some fun and rape her again before killing her… I have nothing more to lose. Far better to put them away forever in a dark room in the desert, and far cheaper.
Read it again people he kidnapped, raped,beat and buried alive another human being.If she was a member of your family would you be okay with him getting 15 years in an Irish prison with sky TV,training programs,gyms and recreational drugs on demand.This vicious dog got what he deserved suffering and death.
Ah come on people read the article and what their crimes were of course they deserved what they got. All you do gooders out there put yourselves in the shoes of the victims family and imagine what they feel. People who commit these crimes will never change we’ve seen stories of people out on parole reoffend in recent times
Terrible. Just wait for the pro death squad in here cheering. But I stink it’s prob better than what the US do to foreign citizens with their indiscriminate bombing that kills and injures thousands of innocent women and children across the globe. It’s torture and killing of its own citizens is also barbaric.
As a Dr… I support trying out more drugs on these animals to improve medicine. I don’t support an eye for an eye but seriously raping and burying someone alive… that is a crime that will torment the family members of the victim for life. What matters most is the welfare of the victim’s family and friends and to stop these barbaric criminals in anyway possible…
What does the question have to do with my opinion on this topic? Am I the one who executed the criminal or was I just saying it will help the face of medicine to put criminals with very barbaric crimes to medical use… let me put it this way. Am at home enjoying the evening with my family and a criminal jumps in violently attacking my family and in self defence I knock him/her out. What kind of question would you ask me then?
The amount of people who haven’t read the article properly is amazing. I think that all rapists should have this sort treatment but shouldn’t die at the end of it … rather that they suffer on for the rest of their lives like they made their victims suffer. And whoever suggested …” only in Obamas America” …. SERIOUSLY???? Executions have been carried out in the good old US of A for a long long time now …. long before Obama was even born Id imagine so get over yourself!
If they are going to use a drugs cocktail to execute someone then they must be 100% sure that the drugs are effective, that there is no chance of failure and that no one suffers a death at the hands of the state like what this inmate suffered.
The prisoners recently failed in their recent court case to stop the execution because the drugs they were to be given were not made by licensed manufacturers but by what amounts to a little more than a chemist shop mixing them up. How right their court action proved to be, I wonder will the judges rue that decision now. Big manufacturers have refused to allow their drugs be used for executions, rightly so in my view.
I don’t care who you are, I don’t think anyone deserves to die in that way. It sounds like a total shambles and everything involved should be ashamed of themselves.
the people who carry out these state endorsed murders are barbarians. isn’t america the only country in the developed world to still do this? i could be wrong…..surely these prisoners who commit unspeakable crimes would have a life time behind bars to think about what they have done……that to me is a worthy punishment….knowing that you will never ever be free again….on another post on this site there are people talking about prehistoric thinking in Stormont rejecting the same sex marriage bill AGAIN…..the states is on a per with those same people…….twisted, religious nutters.
I am against the death penalty for the simple reason that you cannot reverse it!
What happened to the man though is that he got away rather lightly….30 minutes of agony vs 40-50 years in solitary confinement! I hope he rots in hell going through this agony until eternity over and over again!
For the other guy I personally think that whoever rapes and murders a baby lost all his human rights and deserves EVERYTHING he gets! I don’t want him to be executed but rather prefer him being beaten up severely by fellow inmates, every day for the next 50 years!
thats it, prison time itself is not punishment today, its too good for them. many are trying to get back in to meet old friends, get free education, free food, plot and learn more dirty tricks. put them to work, digging tunnels. there is no deterrent anymore in our own system.
Considering less crime occurs in Ireland then the US, and there is only one of the forty nations that still carry out executions where you are less likely to be murdered then then Ireland we must be doing something right.
No sympathy at all for him, sk.mbag deserved worse. I feel sorry for the victims family with this making worldwide news no doubt making them relive their agony
Cheaper to put him in front of a firing squad and let the squad take pot shots , not to kill him yet to make him feel how shooting someone feels like . Then after a cup of tea put a double tap to the head and bury in limestone . No trace of ever being on this earth remains .
How is it a botched execution? He died, did you see how his victim died ? If there is a God perhaps the hand of divine retribution played a part in his prolonged and hopefully painful demise.
How can some people say that people who commit theses crimes don’t deserve the death penalty ? If it was your family memeber that were the victim would u feel the same? Can’t rehabilitate every rapist and murderer, they have to pay for the crimes !
Is the reason the state are so desperate to keep the source of the drugs secret due to the fact the last company that supplied the drugs thought they where being used for medical treatments and refused to continue supplying the DOC after they found out that the drugs where being used to kill people, leading to the shortage of the drugs that required the change in the drugs cocktail in the first place?
Close to 20,000 people pay their respects to Pope Francis ahead of funeral on Saturday
Updated
2 hrs ago
3.8k
15
Wealth
Dun Laoghaire-Rathdown has wealthiest households with €85,000 average income
38 mins ago
2.6k
7
Courts
Trial underway for Dublin man charged with murder of girlfriend while on holiday in Spain
5 hrs ago
31.8k
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 175 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 117 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 155 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 121 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 87 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 88 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 42 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 38 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 143 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 67 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 83 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 90 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 38 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 52 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 28 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 107 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 76 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 57 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 96 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 77 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say