Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

File Yves Logghe/AP/Press Association Images

Euthanasia for terminally ill children legalised in Belgium

In total, there were 86 votes in favour and 44 against from the country’s lower House of Representatives.

TWELVE YEARS AFTER legalising euthanasia for adults, Belgium’s parliament extended the right to die to terminally ill children of any age Thursday, despite opposition from the Church and some pediatricians.

After months of heated debate, the lower House of Representatives adopted legislation making the largely Catholic country the second after the Netherlands to allow mercy-killing for children, and the first to lift all age restrictions.

Euthanasia

The ground-breaking legislation was adopted by 86 votes in favour, 44 against and with 12 abstentions. Belgium is one of three countries in Europe to allow euthanasia for adults.

“It is not a question of imposing euthanasia on anyone … but of allowing a child not to agonise in pain,” said Socialist MP Karine Lalieux ahead of the vote.

Unlike the Dutch across the border, where euthanasia is allowed for children over 12, the law states that any incurably sick child may request to end their suffering if “conscious”, and if equipped with “a capacity of discernment”.

“The right to consider the question of life and death cannot be restricted to adults,” said liberal MP Daniel Bacquelaine.

Addressing controversy over the decision not to set an age restriction for “discernment”, he said a child’s “legal age isn’t the same as mental age.”

But opponents, largely members of centrist Christian-leaning parties, attacked the legislation for failing to set a minimum age for youngsters to be able to request euthanasia.

‘The world is watching us in amazement’

Saying “the world is watching us in amazement”, Christian Democrat Sonja Becq said a child’s “capacity of discernment” was a “vague” concept, “a grey area”.

“How will a doctor determine whether a child has a capacity of discernment?” she asked.

Socialist senator Philippe Mahoux, author of Belgium’s historic 2002 “right to die” legislation and himself a doctor, had called for the law to be widened to minors so as to provide a legal framework for medics who help children in pain die as a question of mercy, but outside the law.

Euthanasia is “the ultimate gesture of humanity” and “not a scandal”, he said. “The scandal is illness and the death of children from disease.”

The law offers the possibility of euthanasia to children “in a hopeless medical situation of constant and unbearable suffering that cannot be eased and which will cause death in the short-term”.

Counselling by doctors and a psychiatrist or psychologist is required, as is parental approval.

Before its adoption by a huge majority in the Senate in December, the upper house consulted dozens of medical specialists, lawyers and interest groups.

But during public debate, religious leaders of all faiths argued that extending euthanasia to the young risked “trivialising” death.

‘A step too far’

In recent days, the Catholic Church staged “a day of fasting and prayer” in protest and this week some 160 pediatricians petitioned lawmakers to postpone the vote on the grounds it was both ill-prepared and unnecessary.

Today’s vote went “a step too far”, Belgian bishops said in a joint statement.

They said they feared the legislation would “open the way to handicapped people, people with dementia, the mentally ill or those who are tired of living” to seek mercy-killing.

“Pain can be eased nowadays, there’s been huge progress in palliative care,” said cancer specialist and signatory Nadine Francotte.

In a stormy exchange in parliament on the eve of the vote, opponents argued that modern palliative medication could relieve pain in very sick youngsters, therefore allowing illness to run a natural course to death.

Thursday’s vote saw Socialists, Liberals and Greens members largely line up in favour, with centrist Christian-leaning parties opposed.

But party whips said it was up to individuals to decide how to vote on this life and death issue.

Ill minors are often more mature

Critics said the legislation failed to address problems and potential loopholes such as possible discord between the two parents over a child’s request to be euthanised.

And they asked how adults could be sure that a child had the “discernment” necessary to decide to give up life or even really understand the notion?

“Experience shows us that in cases of serious illness and imminent death, minors develop very quickly a great maturity, to the point where they are often better able to reflect and express themselves on life than healthy people,” a group of pediatricians in favour of the legislation said in December.

Polls showed a majority of Belgians backing the proposal but there was a surge of concern last year when a 44-year-old in distress after a failed sex change was euthanised on psychological grounds in a highly publicised case.

Belgium registered 1,432 cases of euthanasia in 2012, up 25 percent. They represented two percent of all deaths.

Neighbouring Netherlands has seen only five euthanasia requests from youngsters in the last decade.

Read: Belgium set to extend euthanasia law to cover children>

Author
AFP
View 167 comments
Close
167 Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds