Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

bottle image via Shutterstock

Judge dismisses damages claim by teen who fell on broken bottle

The 14-year-old boy’s parents claimed the grass in the common area was knee-high when he fell on the bottle.

A 14-YEAR-old schoolboy, who lacerated his leg on a broken bottle while playing football in “knee-high” grass on a common area near his home, has lost a €38,000 personal injury claim against a housing association.

Judge Jacqueline Linnane said in the Circuit Civil Court today that if the grass was as long as described to the court by the boy’s parents she wondered how children could even see a football in it.

Owen Jones, sued through his mother Simone Jones, housing agency Respond, of Airmount, Dominick Place, Waterford. Jones, of Ard Mor Court, Tallaght, Dublin, told Judge Linnane that in September 2010 her son had fallen on a broken bottle concealed in the grass.

“If the grass had been kept cut the bottle would have been visible. It was the cause of my son’s injury,” she told barrister Paul Fogarty, counsel for Respond and Zurich Insurance.

Jones said she had taken Owen to hospital where he had received several stitches in his left knee.

Owen’s father, Paul Jones, said the grass “was never really cut and was completely out of control.”

Fogarty, who appeared with Collins Crowley Solicitors, told the court there was a lot of difficulty with vandalism and cider parties were commonplace in the area.

Problematic estate

Christopher Deegan, maintenance officer with Respond, said Ard More was a very troublesome, problematic estate where there was a lot of anti-social behaviour, cider parties and illegal dumping. It was a very difficult place to work in.

He told Fogarty, who appeared with Collins Crowley Solicitors, that when he saw the amount Respond was spending on vandalism he had brought it to the attention of his financial director and a meeting had been held with the residents.

Deegan said there was a high degree of residents in arrears of rent and they had been told it was difficult, in such circumstances, to bring vandalism under control.

Cut regularly

The grass was cut regularly by a contractor who was hired by Respond to be responsible for everything regarding maintenance. The estate was swept and cleaned every week. He had never seen “knee high” grass in the estate.

Judge Linnane said the Ard Mor Estate had serious problems of vandalism, cider parties, and anti-social behaviour with a lot of residents not paying their rent.

She said the Housing Association was dependant on rental income in order to deal with matters and they had kept a maintenance system in place and dealt with the situation to the best of its ability

She found that Respond had no case to answer in liability and dismissed Owen’s claim.

Read: Chef awarded €7k after getting electric shock from panini machine>

Read: Teen wins €2,500 damages from Luas operator after driver insinuated she was a pickpocket>

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Author
Ray Managh
View 36 comments
Close
36 Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds