Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Euro coins via Shutterstock

Budget 2014 had greatest impact on low-income groups

A new look at budgets from 2009 to 2014 by the ESRI shows that the lowest impact of next year’s budget was on some middle income groups.

A NEW ANALYSIS of Irish budgets from 2009 – 2014 showed that the greatest impact Budget 2014 had was on low-income groups.

The paper, from the Economic and Social Research Institute, looks at the distributional impact of tax, welfare and public service pay policies in Irish budgets from 2009 – 2014.

It analyses the available evidence on the impact of Budget 2014, and of the series of budgets from October 2008 up to and including October 2013.

Results

The results show that Budget 2014 had its greatest impact, which was a reduction of 2 per cent, on low income groups.

Meanwhile, the lowest impact was on some middle income groups (a loss of 1 to 1.25 per cent) while the top income group lost slightly less than 1.75 per cent.

It noted that the results for 2014 are quite different to those of the full period from 2009 to 2014, as over that period, all income groups experienced losses.

Income loss was in a narrow range of between 11 and 12 per cent for most income groups.

The greatest losses were for those in the highest 10 per cent of household income, as this group saw losses of about 15.5 per cent. These losses were mainly from tax increases and reductions in public service pay.

But at the other end of the income scale, policy-induced losses were somewhat higher than average (about 12.5 per cent) for those with the lowest incomes.

The ESRI said that these results “do not conform with either a progressive pattern (losses increasing with income) or regressive pattern (losses declining with income)”.

Over a substantial range the pattern is broadly proportional – similar percentage losses for each income group. But this does not extend to whole income distribution. Contrary to some perceptions of a sharper squeeze on middle income groups, the greatest policy-induced losses have been at the top of the income distribution, and the next greatest losses at the bottom.

To read the full document, click here.

Read: Concern over Budget 2014 weakened consumer sentiment last month>

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
82 Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds