Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

California governor Jerry Brown said he hoped the legislation would banish therapy for gay minors "to the dustbin of quackery". Reed Saxon/AP

California bans therapy to 'reverse' homosexuality in minors

The state’s governor says the legislation should relegate such treatments “to the dustbin of quackery”.

CALIFORNIA HAS BECOME the first state in the United States to outlaw therapy which claims to be able reverse – or “overcome” – homosexuality in minors.

The legislation prohibits any therapy on under-18s which hopes to surpress their sexuality or to be ‘cured’ of sexual feelings towards those of their own gender.

The New York Times says the law, which takes effect from January, forbids mental health providers from offering any cousnelling or therapy aimed at changing their sexual orientation.

This includes any attempt to “change behaviours or gender expressions, or to eliminate or reduce sexual or romantic attractions or feelings toward individuals of the same sex”.

On Twitter, state governor Jerry Brown said the bill’s effects would be to ban “nonscientific ‘therapies’ that have driven young people to depression and suicide”, adding:

These practices have no basis in science or medicine, and they will now be relegated to the dustbin of quackery.

Democratic state senator Ted Lieu, who proposed the bill, commended Brown’s signature of the bill and for “ending this type of quackery”.

“No one should stand idly by while children are being psychological abused,” he said on his website, “and anyone who forces a child to try to change their sexual orientation must understand this is unacceptable.”

The move had been favoured by LGBT support groups, who said such treatment had “drastically negative effects” on the well-being of young people – but AP said it was opposed by some in conservative quarters.

They argued that the ban conflicts with the rights of parents ‘to provide psychological care for children experiencing gender confusion’, and said the ban had been motivated by political favour and not scientific merit.

Read: Joan Burton commits to examining gender recognition

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
35 Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds