Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Jordan Strauss via PA Images

Casey Affleck pulls out of presenting best actress award at Oscars

There has been renewed attention on historic accusations of sexual harassment against Affleck in recent months.

SCANDAL-HIT CASEY Affleck has withdrawn from presenting the best actress award at the Oscars, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences and the actor’s publicist have said.

Neither gave a reason for Affleck pulling out of the 4 March ceremony, but the announcement comes after renewed attention on historic accusations of sexual harassment against the 42-year-old star.

“We appreciate the decision to keep the focus on the show and on the great work of this year,” an academy spokesman told AFP.

In 2010, Amanda White and Magdalena Gorka, the producer and cinematographer on his poorly-received directorial debut, mockumentary “I’m Still Here”, sued Affleck for what they described as repeated sexual harassment.

Affleck, who has always vehemently denied any wrongdoing, employed the services of celebrity lawyer Marty Singer – known as “Hollywood’s guard dog” – and settled for an undisclosed amount in both cases.

The lawsuits began making headlines again around a year ago, in the run-up to Affleck winning a best actor Oscar for his restrained, devastating performance in Kenneth Lonergan’s family drama Manchester by the Sea.

Tradition dictates that best actor winners present the following year’s award for best actress, and vice-versa.

#MeToo movement

There has been widespread speculation over whether Affleck would take part, however, as the #MeToo movement against sexual misconduct gathered force following numerous allegations against Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein and others.

News of his withdrawal was broken by Mike Fleming Jr, a writer for the Deadline Hollywood website, who said he had heard the actor “did not want to become a distraction from the focus that should be on the performances of the actresses in the category”.

“He was in a no-win situation, with all the attention surrounding the #MeToo movement. The spectre of Affleck presenting would have created controversy,” Fleming added.

Affleck’s publicist Mara Buxbaum confirmed he would not be attending but did not elaborate.

The twin lawsuits painted the actor at best as a manipulative ringmaster, an image at odds with his own self-projection as a fame-shy artist toiling away on the edges of an industry that had long overlooked his talent.

Among the most egregious of the allegations – all of which Affleck rejects – White says the star got an assistant cameraman to expose himself, despite her protestations, during a flight.

Gorka left the project after treatment described in her lawsuit as “the most traumatising of her career”, accusing Affleck and other crew members of openly talking about engaging in sexual acts with her.

Read: Saoirse Ronan has been nominated for an Oscar for leading actress

More: Oscars introducing strict new envelope rules to prevent another major mix-up

Author
View 32 comments
Close
32 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Honey Badger
    Favourite Honey Badger
    Report
    Jun 11th 2019, 9:19 AM

    Terrible Terrible news. RIP

    32
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Adolf Galland
    Favourite Adolf Galland
    Report
    Jun 11th 2019, 9:21 PM

    @Honey Badger: Thought you were a racist?

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Fabian Lee
    Favourite Fabian Lee
    Report
    Jun 11th 2019, 9:43 AM

    Were the passengers provided with or wearing life jackets?
    They might have had some chance if they had.

    7
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Dan
    Favourite Dan
    Report
    Jun 11th 2019, 9:47 AM

    @Fabian Lee: they were inside due to it raining. It flipped so fast they had no chance. Very sad..RIP

    26
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Johannes Baader
    Favourite Johannes Baader
    Report
    Jun 12th 2019, 1:54 AM

    @Fabian Lee: You didn’t follow the news at all …. but thank you for this enlightening comment. Nearly as idiot as Trumps comment to get planes in to extinguish the fire at Notre Dame in Paris

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute William Kelly
    Favourite William Kelly
    Report
    Jun 12th 2019, 6:44 AM

    I thought the bigger cruiser had the right of way, & that the smaller vessel seemed to be crossing the main shipping lane.
    Also looks as if life jackets were left unused on the vessel that sank.

    1
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

Leave a commentcancel

 
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds