Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Dan Taylor via Flickr

Catholic priests group accuses RTÉ of insincerity over Fr Reynolds apology

The Association of Catholic Priests has accused sections of the media of “anti-Catholic and anti-priest bias”.

Updated 1.35pm

THE ASSOCIATION OF Catholic Priests has issued a statement accusing sections of the media of  ”anti-Catholic and anti-priest bias” in the wake of the Fr. Kevin Reynolds case.

RTÉ was forced to apologise to the priest after he was accused in the Prime Time programme of raping a teenage girl while he worked as a missionary in Africa in the eighties, and of fathering a child with the girl.

RTÉ accepted that the allegations were baseless, without any foundation and were untrue. The broadcaster also paid undisclosed damages to Fr Reynolds.

The Association of Catholic Priests has said that the Primetime incident, along with results of a survey commissioned by the Iona Institute points towards media bias among sections of the media, “including some in the national broadcaster”.

The group has also said that it was disappointed by the way RTÉ’s statement and apology was broadcast on television and radio, citing “poor quality delivery” which “seemed to imply a lack of sincerity about the content”.

The treatment of Catholic issues in general by the media are also criticised in the statement, which details that critics of the Church are allowed free reign, while Church representatives are aggressively questioned and harassed. Church protocols in dealing with the handling of allegations about priests are also under scrutiny by the group:

If RTÉ can be criticised for not waiting a few weeks until such time as Kevin Reynolds had a chance to clear his name by taking the paternity test, as he had offered to do, surely the Church authorities should have been equally circumspect about any action that could be seen to imply guilt on his part.

Robert Dore, the solicitor who represented Fr Reynolds spoke to RTÉ today and said he was very interested to know who the “reliable independent third party source” was, who allegedly provided information about the case. He said that Fr Reynold has a right to know who it is.

Dore also said that the premise of journalistic confidentiality is flawed in this case, and also said that once RTÉ had realised that they were wrong they behaved very well, but behaved appallingly before that. He cited their decision to broadcast the material despite the offer of a paternity test and repeated denials.

RTÉ apologises over false allegations made against Fr Kevin Reynolds

RTÉ apology to priest in High Court “a wake-up call”

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Author
Emer McLysaght
View 80 comments
Close
80 Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds