Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
AN UNANNOUNCED INSPECTION of a children’s residential centre in the south of the country found that there were issues with compliance across the service.
The inspection was carried out by the Health and Information Quality Authority (HIQA), on 28 and 29 June 2017.
According to its report, HIQA judged that the centre was mostly non compliant across the various standards, including children’s rights (moderate non-compliance), care of young people (major non-compliance), and premises and safety (major non-compliance). The centre was substantially compliant under the education standard and compliant under the monitoring standard.
The centre, based in the south, provided medium- to long-term residential care for up to four children aged between 13 and 17 on admission. Placements were provided to both males and females.
At the time of the inspection, there were three children living in the centre.
During this inspection, inspectors met with or spoke to three children, managers and staff, as well as two social workers, a social work team leader, a Guardian ad Litem, an independent advocate and the line manager for the monitoring officer.
Challenges
The centre had previously been inspected in November 2016, when managers and staff “were having difficulty in managing behaviour that challenges”, while inspectors “sought assurances that all the children were suitably placed and that the issues of concern were being adequately addressed”.
At that time, the building “remained unsuitable for the creation of a homely atmosphere for children”.
Inspectors found that “the difficulties in managing behaviour that challenges” had worsened for a period of around five months until they were mainly resolved in late April 2017.
Even though meetings were held on the problems, HIQA said:
the issues were not resolved in a timely manner with the result that children were subjected to bullying, intimidation, physical assault, property damage, and an atmosphere of fear during that time.
There was a period of approximately three months from December 2016 in which there was no centre manager as the permanent centre manager was on long-term leave.
An interim centre manager was appointed, and inspectors found improvements following this. However, there were a number of areas where improvements were required, including with the building, children’s rights, health and safety and management and staffing.
Findings
Centre records showed that there were 255 significant events during the seven months since the previous inspection.
In some serious incidents, “children engaged in a variety of risk-taking behaviours, assaults on other children and on staff, property damage, fire setting, intimidation of other children and racist remarks, namecalling, and inappropriate sexual behaviour”.
HIQA said in its report that managers and staff tried to manage this behaviour in a number of ways.
Meetings were convened to review the events, while people such as social care leaders and staff from an external agency were engaged to provide extra support to children and ensure they had extra activities outside the centre.
Individual crisis management plans were already in place but safety plans were introduced and reviewed regularly for individual children, and group risk assesments were also introduced.
However, said HIQA, these initiatives made little impact on the negative behaviours. In early February 2017, the interim service manager told other professionals that the centre could no longer offer a service to one of the children due to their unmanageable behaviour.
Centre records also showed that gardaí were called to the centre on 11 occasions to support the management of behaviour. There were two occasions when staff locked themselves in the staff office and called gardaí to deal with the children’s behaviour.
Intervention
There were four incidents of physical intervention in the care of the children since the previous inspection.
The interim centre manager told inspectors that, since the previous inspection, managers ensured that there were always a number of staff on duty that could carry out physical interventions with children and inspectors observed that this was checked by staff each day as part of their morning planning meetings.
Data provided by the centre showed that there were 58 incidents of unauthorised absences since the previous inspection. When children went missing from care, the centre followed the national policy for children missing from care. Children had absence management plans on their files but these were not always completed in full.
There were 10 child protection concerns reported to the social work department since the previous inspection. Four of these had been investigated and were deemed to be unfounded. Six were still under investigation at the time of inspection.
The building was described as “institutional in character and not suitable for the creation of a homely atmosphere for children”.
There were no shops or amenities in close proximity and the centre was at a considerable distance from the city centre.
HIQA said that while children were supported and encouraged to adopt healthy lifestyles, all three children smoked and two of the children had taken up smoking since their admission to the centre.
However, there was evidence that staff provided information and advice to children in regard to smoking cessation.
Inspectors found that protocols or procedures in place between the residential service and the social work department were not sufficiently robust to ensure that urgent concerns regarding the behaviours of children in the centre were addressed jointly, and in a timely manner, and that they were escalated to the appropriate decision-makers when urgent action was deemed necessary
Risk management systems were not effective. For example, even though there were individual risk assessments in place for children and group safety plans were also put in place, behaviour such as bullying, intimidation and absconsions from the centre continued in the centre.
An action plan was created, which set out actions to be taken regarding the non-compliance levels across the inspection report.
Tusla response
Commenting on the inspection’s findings, Donal McCormack, National Service Director, Children’s Residential Services, Tusla, said that HIQA inspections “are an important measurement and oversight tool for us”.
This report shows a service where all children had a care plan. Where children are actively encouraged to participate in activities such as cycling and canoeing, and where staff ensure special events are celebrated. For example, children feel at ease dropping into the centre manager’s office whenever they wanted to.
HIQA has also identified areas for improvement and these have been addressed in the action plan, with many already complete.
Tusla outlined some of the changes made, including:
The Green Party would probably go one better and tax people just for watching a TV ad about fossil fuels
@Chaotic State: Keep piling on the taxes. That’ll sort it all out, and, if it doesn’t then just pile on some more of them.
@Chaotic State: fossil fuels, especially oil, have raised the standard of living for different people groups and every nation in the world, particularly since the start of the twentieth century. Oil has brought millions upon millions and millions more out of poverty, and saved many more than it wil ever kill
@Kieran Mac C: Possibly in Alaska, where admirable native community leaders have insisted on profit sharing with the people of Alaska. Elsewhere in the world, nations are known for their pollution, city congestion, traffic kill rates and a vast difference between those profiting exclusively from fossil fuel prices and those in poverty with breathing difficulties.
Can you name anywhere that’s benefited equally from rail travel, other than Europe? The US used to have a great and modern network, yet has been trying to deny decent public transport to millions of their own citizens for decades.
@F Fitzgerald: Off the top of my head…agriculture, pharmaceuticals, electricity, irrigation, transport, aquaculture, ambulances, day-glo jackets worn by ‘Just Stop Oli’ protestors, air-purifying systems in sterile surgical theatres, prosthetic limbs, health monitoring systems, computers, phones, affordable clothing and footwear.
Oil has raised the standard of living for not just western socity, but all society, even those poor, put-upon citizens of North Korea, who would suffer even worse famine were it not for mechanised oil-fired systems (‘tractors’)to gather at least some of their harvest. Oh, and modern hospitals. Don’t forget the hospitals
Ireland is too small to make a difference, if you believe in the climate agenda
@Irish Axe: Forget climate, clean air is more than enough reason.
@Irish Axe: We are part of the EU, which is not ‘too small to make a difference’.
Anyway, everyone, every place, everywhere can make a difference.
When Murphy talks, I generally stop listening. Likewise this article, I haven’t read it. I’m certain it’s nonsense.
@honey badger: All good points, free transport for all, trains everywhere (I don’t know in who’s lifetime thats going to happen) but an advertising ban is like skimming a stone in the middle of the ocean. Still I’d be for it, no harm. We could use less advertising.
@honey badger: ‘lets go burn down the observatory, so this will never happen again!’
@Setanta O’Toole:
“My dear Kepler, I wish that we might laugh at the remarkable stupidity of the common herd who do not want to look at the planets, the moon, or the telescope, even though I have freely and deliberately offered them the opportunity a thousand times?.” Galileo
It isn’t parts per million of carbon dioxide that will define this era, but the manipulation of images of the Earth to suit clockwork solar system modelling.
https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap210922.html
None of you feel anything for good or otherwise, and that is the definition of a subculture based on those who are perceptively dead.
@Gerald Kelleher: zzzzzzzz.
@honey badger: It is nonsense, all Murphy says is!!
@Setanta O’Toole:
” And twofold Always. May God us keep From Single vision & Newtons sleep.” William Blake
It is good that you reacted with sleep symbols, as it is indeed a type of perceptive sleep you and many in society suffer from. That era’s clockwork solar system modelling was the basis for all scientific or mechanical modelling.
The Age of Reason is the Age of Treason, an attempt to seal humanity off from its higher faculties and goodness me, society has paid dearly for that.
@Gerald Kelleher: it was a simpsons qoute Gerald. Take a day off lad.
@Setanta O’Toole:
I live in the expansive world of Western astronomy, whereas many of you live in the cartoon world of experimental theorists created a few centuries ago through the Royal Society.
It is not that you can reason your way out of that perceptive sleep you suffer from, it is that you feel nothing for the visual narratives that would heal you and so many others.
The observatories were burned down to make way for scientific method voodoo long before any of you were born. It isn’t that you take a day off, in a cartoon world, you haven’t really lived with a connection to terrestrial and solar system surroundings.
@Gerald Kelleher: the qoute lampoons those who are anti-science and would rather live in denial, which Is what I assume you were making me out to be with your initial diatribe. If you weren’t so busy hoping to god you can fool people into thinking you are a genius with your pretentious word salads and obscure references, you might be able to identify subtext/sarcasm and the use of quotation marks before you jump the gun in your constant quest to be the smartest in the room.
How many times does it have to be said that there is no viable alternative to fossil fuels now or for the foreseeable future.
The big oil companies are not going to allow their profits to be eroded until the crude supply runs out. They will exploit every last drop.
Fuel advertising makes f all difference. We all know what petrol and diesel are, and most just look for the lowest prices.
@Ciaran: Apparently Toyota are to stop making fully electric, rowing in behind hydrogen.
@Ciaran: If we wait until the last drop to switch energy source 90% of us will die.
We have to start now and use alternatives wherever we can while we still have enough fossil fuels to keep the lights on and things moving while we build the wind and solar farms as well as the massive energy storage facilities we will need.
The big oil companies are already making their transition plans.
@Steve O’Hara-Smith: it’s already there, hydrogen and nuclear.
This guy’s voter base see him for the tool that he is, all for open borders & no solutions to where these people will be housed or the services required for them, while the people at home have been abandoned by this woke socialist. The guy is a complete waste of a vote. Heard it all from PBP when I heard Brid Smith say on RTE, that we are a wealthy country, Murphy & PBP couldn’t give a toss for working class Irish workers, more interested in those arriving in record numbers here daily. Any utterances out of him are horse manure.
If Murphy and his ilk had their way we would all be barefoot and living off potatoes
@Joseph Lenihan: I don’t know – the main parties seem bent on making everyone else live in their cars while hoping for an affordable place to rent. It’s getting to be a vicious cycle.
Does anyone ever use fossil fuels based on advertising? You’ll hear your house however it’s set up. You’ll fly in a plane whichever airline it is and likewise for driving a car whatever make. Large ticket items like wind farms, solar farms etc. will make the big difference.
Windbag
You see, PBP voters do t have to get up in the morning to drive to work.
They get their unlimited free dole wired to their accounts while they sleep in their free houses.
No tax? No vote!
Where do these government people think all their tax comes from, now also want to stop marketing revenue so people in marketing jobs get hit aswell. People look at prices and choose cheapest option not brand names. Watch out as soon as fossil fuels go you will see taxes on clean energy aswell. No escaping !!!!!!
@Paul Geraghty: AI will sort out all those marketing jobs sooner than later, there won’t be many marketing jobs left to lose.
This nonsense reminded me of “don’t talk the economy down”, we need heating oil and petrol until we have affordable alternatives.
“There is no question of anyone being prevented from buying a new or second hand car.”… VRT?
Ireland most dependent nation on cars I wonder why?
Living in reality Paul or just ignorant of the facts that most of us have no choice around public transport options?
We all have paid vast sums in taxes to be consistently wasted by this and former governments.
I have little expectation next government whoever it is will do the same and then blame everyone except themselves.
Just 100 companies produced 71 % of GHG emissions. Are you doing your bit though?
@Louis Jacob: Spineless in the face of the master.
Totally agree with this. The majority of people have no need for a huge SUV – it’s a status symbol for many. They take up so much space on the road and are so high up the drivers can’t often see if a child is right in front of them. Public transport should also be way more expensive, regular and affordable to get more cars off the road.
@Sylvia Power: expansive*
@Sylvia Power: what planet do you live on. More expensive and affordable public transport.
@Joe Kelly: Expansive, it was a typo.
@Sylvia Power: Public transport should definitely be extended in large urban areas and free car parks on the outskirts of these areas so people commuting can benefit from it. Unfortunately public transport will not be able to be provided to a lot of our population due to allowing the building of one off houses on every back road and lane in the country.
@Sylvia Power: People are entitled to spend their money whatever way they want, just like you do!! If I want to drive a gas guzzling SUV I will. I won’t be dictated to by begrudgers!!
“ecosocialist” – that term really sends a shiver up the spine. The environment is a great excuse for ” the people” (read: the state) the take over everything and make it worse
Murphy gets a bit of exposure..that’s all he wants.
This could probably have more of an impact in reducing emmisions with little to no cost to the public compared to than all the new cycle lanes and additional stealth carbon taxes the Green Party have introduced since they have came into power.
@John Dennehy: This will have exactly 0% impact. People have buy petrol and heating oil. Advertising or no Advertising won’t change anything.
@Wolfgang Bonow: @Wolfgang Bonow: Poor aul Ryanair won’t be too happy when they can’t advertise their €20 euro return winter special to liverpool, I’m pretty sure Micheal O Leary wont agree with you on your opinion on advertising.
While the rest of us have to pay extra taxes for everything due to ” Climate change ” & all he’s worried about is banning the advertising rather than trying banning fossil fuel completely, which we’ve been led to believe is such a disaster for the planet. Along with Aviation & yet in Ireland, the sales of private planes have risen since Covid with figures almost doubling! But the rest of us are told to grow lettuce!
@Colette Kearns: Is he not pointing out that fossil fuel advertising is working when most people can’t imagine life without a car? Imagine the modern, European style railways we could have if we didn’t settle for having to buy so many cars and having roads everywhere?
Pay more tax people and don’t be whinging about needing alternative transport to work get up earlier and cycle the distance. Take family showers together also and preserve our clean water, perhaps even with close friends or neighbours,we can do it if we all work together and make that difference.
Advertising of fossil fuels has no effect.
Banning sales of new fossil fueled vehicles from NOW would have an effect.
Alternatively requiring a public health warning on all new fossil fueled cars (big, ugly and unmissable printing on both sides of the car) would reduce sales of them.
The current crop of electric cars are good enough, although reps will trash the batteries with regular fast charging.
As for home heating, insulation is by far the most effective way of reducing heating fuel consumption unless it’s already close to passive house standard. So push that hard with grants and raise the standards for new builds because retrofitting insulation is hard and expensive.
@Roy Dowling: True, who’s going to deliver solar panels if we give up diesel?
Real change would be banning Paul Murphy from ever opening his gob in public again…
If this government are serious about climate change give everyone in the country a once off new heat exchange system for there homes fully payed for and invest big in hydrogen fueling Stations around the country not electric its not the future electric EVs are dead in the water .give massive discounts on family’s first hydrogen car to get them on the ladder after that they can trade in .but the first car is out of reach financially for most family’s.
Banwaggoning and this is the real Elizabeth Doyle
He should launch a campaign on Earth Day to recover that this Day is also one rotation of the Earth along with its sunrise/sunset cycle.
Scientific method modellers in the 17th-century Royal Society tried to change the reference for one rotation away from the stationary Sun to the daily change in position of the stars instead.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BYy0EQBnqHI
They didn’t know that the stars change position annually due to the orbital motion of the Earth.
https://sol24.net/data/html/SOHO/C3/96H/VIDEO/
The Sun is stationary while the Earth moves, and the satellite, free from daily rotation influences, captures what we see from the surface. There is no need to be dull on this Earth Day; that timelapse is a new demonstration that the Earth moves around the Sun.
Very quickly.
An experimental hypothesis is not the same as an astronomical hypothesis Kepler had to make using the Ptolemaic framework for a moving Earth in a Sun-centred system. The Ptolemaic framework was used for astronomical predictions as dates using the calendar system, so the contentious issue was whether the framework that accurately predicted events could also be used to affirm a moving Earth as a fact.
Raising the standard of consideration would remove scientific method modelling from climate. The paid professionals have no talent or incentive to change so that leaves people willing to collaborate to create the necessary visual narratives for free and often in a hostile environment.
The real power today is not with social politics but with academic politics.
Clowns running the asylum
Well, then we have to ban advertising everything that is made from oil and gas because oil and gas companies don’t just make money from filling up your car or home heating, things like TVs, phones, medical devices and drugs, furniture, makeup, roads, building supplies, home appliances, solar panels, wind turbines, foreign holidays by plane and ship etc etc etc. you cannot take gas and oil out of the ground take what you want from it and put the rest back. These politicians are imbeciles.
@brendan C5: I think you misunderstood the article – the proposal is specifically focused on fossil fuels. Not on medical devices, appliances or furniture – although if fuel prices keep rising, furniture may become fuel! Lumber prices shot up during COVID, so that’s making everywhere more expensive to live despite being natural. Roads are built to cater for private cars. My grandparents didn’t run a car and went everywhere by train.
Absolute HEADCASE
And all this from the man who was largely responsible for the most stupid mistake ever in our recent political history. Charge for the rubbish and give the water free. Let alone the environmental absurdity of it, 250,000 are paying for the water and their rubbish. So now we have constant littering and fly tipping and a capital starved water provision system.
I like the idea. Ban fossils ads in a small country, big countries may well follow suit.
@Roy Dowling: Fair point. Maybe advertising is making life less affordable for people by only promoting one way of transport?
Ban travel for St Patrick’s day for you know who
When one has nothing to say, but whose profile depends on publicity, it is essential that one says whatever one can, however ludicrous or damaging to those that will hear what is said.
have your say