Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

A woman carries her two babies at a railway station in Dongguan, in south China's Guangdong province. Greg Baker/AP/PA

China to relax one-child policy, abolish labour camps

A raft of reforms announced today also included reductions on the application of the death penalty.

CHINA’S COMMUNIST RULERS announced an easing of the controversial one-child policy amid a raft of sweeping pledges unveiled today including the abolition of “re-education” labour camps and loosening economic controls.

The moves also included reductions on the application of the death penalty, reforms to a widely abused “petition” system and changes in a residency registration scheme.

They were contained in a 22,000-word document on “major issues concerning comprehensively deepening reforms” released by the official Xinhua news agency, three days after a key meeting of the Communist leadership in Beijing.

The gathering, known as the Third Plenum, has historically been the venue for major reform announcements, and comes one year after new leaders took charge of the ruling party.

One-child policy

Couples will be allowed to have two children if one of the parents is an only child – widening the exceptions to a rule introduced in the late 1970s to control China’s population, the world’s largest.

The policy has at times been brutally enforced, with authorities relying on permits, fines and in some cases forced sterilisations and late-term abortions that have triggered public outrage.

Critics also argue that it has contributed to the gender imbalance of about six boys born for every five girls, with sex-specific abortions remaining common.

Beijing’s statisticians warned this year that China’s working-age population had begun to shrink for the first time in recent decades, falling by 3.45 million to 937 million in 2012.

“The birth policy will be adjusted and improved step by step to promote ‘long-term balanced development of the population in China’,” Xinhua said.

The law currently restricts most parents to one child, with exceptions including some rural families whose first child is a girl, ethnic minorities, and couples who are both only children.

Joan Kaufman, director of the Columbia Global Centers in Beijing and an public health expert, called the relaxation a “long overdue” move that will ease concerns about care for China’s elderly population.

“There’s no concern about overpopulation in China anymore. Couples are having fewer kids. They’re not replacing themselves,” she said, noting that the fertility rate is well below the “replacement” rate of 2.1.

Labour camps

China will also abolish its controversial “re-education through labour” system, under which police panels can sentence offenders to up to four years in camps without a trial, the document said.

Xinhua said the move was “part of efforts to improve human rights and judicial practices”, which also included reducing the number of crimes subject to the death penalty.

The deeply unpopular labour camp system is largely used for petty offenders but also blamed for rights abuses by officials seeking to punish “petitioners” who try to complain about them to higher authorities.

Under the scheme, introduced in 1957, people can be sent for up to four years by a police panel without a court appearance.

A 2009 United Nations report estimated that such facilities held 190,000 Chinese.

Pressure to change the system has been building for years.

In a high-profile case last year, Tang Hui, a mother from Hunan province, was sentenced for petitioning repeatedly after her 11-year-old daughter was kidnapped and forced to work as a prostitute.

Maya Wang, a researcher for overseas-based campaign group Human Rights Watch, welcomed the move but cautioned that the replacement was not yet known.

Other forms of extralegal detention remained in place, she said, and “the suppression of dissent continues”.

An earlier Third Plenum in 1978 introduced fundamental economic reforms that ushered in decades of breakneck growth and transformed China.

Growth

The economic changes announced today signalled authorities would loosen their grip on the world’s second-largest economy, which experts say needs restructuring to ensure long-term growth.

The plans include requiring state firms to pay the government larger dividends and allowing private companies a bigger role in the economy, the document said.

“This will have an effect on facilitating a better competitive environment,” ANZ Banking Group economist Liu Ligang said.

China will also “accelerate the reform” of its household registration or “hukou” system, which bars rural residents from equal access to benefits such as healthcare and education when they move to cities.

The move could bolster authorities’ drive to increase urbanisation as a way to lift living standards.

But critics fear lifting the restrictions could cause overcrowding in major conurbations such as Beijing, and Xinhua said changes would be introduced in small cities first.

China also pledged to reform a petition system, where citizens seeking to lodge complaints against authorities often end up in unofficial “black jails”.

“Authorities must respond to and terminate cases within the legal framework,” Xinhua said, without elaborating.

Users of China’s Twitter-like service Sina Weibo cheered the reforms – although some sounded bittersweet.

“Thanks to the active participation of the public and media and the advocacy of legal activists. This proves the truth that rights can only be obtained through a fight,” wrote one poster.

Another user said of former labour camp prisoners: “Those who paid a heavy price will be emotional tonight.”

- © AFP 2013.

Read: Kenny pressed on human rights issues ahead of China trip>

Read: Newborn baby survives after being ‘flushed down toilet’>

Author
View 36 comments
Close
36 Comments
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Sean Beag
    Favourite Sean Beag
    Report
    Nov 26th 2012, 8:43 AM

    Party based voting is a perversion of the democratic process. It should be illegal to force a TD to vote a certain way. They are supposed to represent their constituents views.

    83
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Jim Walsh
    Favourite Jim Walsh
    Report
    Nov 26th 2012, 5:57 PM

    They are elected on a party platform as opposed to their own views. Therefore its reasonable to assume that most people voting for them are also voting on the party platform. It would then be wrong for them to suddenly decide that they don’t want to represent that platform. If that’s what they want they should go as an independent before the electorate.

    5
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Brian O'Sullivan
    Favourite Brian O'Sullivan
    Report
    Apr 18th 2013, 10:25 AM

    There’s nothing wrong with party based voting, per se. It’s party based speaking time in the Dáil that’s the problem. The smaller your party, the less time you have to speak. If you’re an independent, you’re screwed unless you put together a technical group.

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Derek Byrne
    Favourite Derek Byrne
    Report
    Nov 26th 2012, 9:03 AM

    Is the catholic church or the government running this country ?

    50
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Dave Harris
    Favourite Dave Harris
    Report
    Nov 26th 2012, 9:31 AM

    Or in other words ‘Is the catholic church or the government RUINING this country?

    46
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Mjhint
    Favourite Mjhint
    Report
    Nov 26th 2012, 11:54 AM

    We have no idea how much the catholic church runs the government. Any politician that is catholic could face excommunication on these matters. Thats the gun being held to their head.Do we really want to live in a state run by an organisation without credibilty. This is a fight to the death for the catholic church. They see their power slipping away.

    24
    See 1 more reply ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute feck'n voters
    Favourite feck'n voters
    Report
    Nov 26th 2012, 4:02 PM

    Since all the Sunday collections have nearly stopped the Fs (FG/FF) have directed larger amounts of tax payers money into church controlled charities (Ruhama, Immigrants Council of Ireland…).

    Those charities in turn use their citizen paid PR departments to push church policy from an ‘independent’ advocacy position. The local TD gets to cut the ribbon at the next charity event, they get elected for ‘doing good for the community’ (non-church groups don’t have a chance) with the aid of the few votes the church can muster.

    The whip ensures that there is no free vote and the church/government policy/finance/vote loop is closed.

    5
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Chris Galligan
    Favourite Chris Galligan
    Report
    Nov 26th 2012, 9:26 AM

    There should be no obfuscation or waffling on this matter. We need to legislate with safeguards for all. Its a disgrace that we have, after all this time, exported our problems abroad as if it never happens. Typically Irish solution to an Irish problem, stick our heads in the sand and hope it goes away. We need “Savita” legislation now.

    45
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Garry Fitzgerald
    Favourite Garry Fitzgerald
    Report
    Nov 26th 2012, 12:05 PM

    We need to legislate with safeguards for all…………………what in all that’s holy could this mean?

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute âš¡Wynnnerâš¡
    Favourite âš¡Wynnnerâš¡
    Report
    Nov 26th 2012, 10:10 AM

    Meanwhile over 4,000 women still travel to the UK, it’s really time we face the reality instead of continuing to stick our heads in a sandbox

    42
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute werejammin
    Favourite werejammin
    Report
    Nov 26th 2012, 9:02 AM

    Another insult to our intelligence by the masters, Fine Gael. They haven’t the nerve to vote as a party on the matter after Savitas death,so are hoping to weasel around it with a free vote.

    Don’t believe me? Where was Shatter calling for a free vote back in April on the same matter?

    33
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Garry Fitzgerald
    Favourite Garry Fitzgerald
    Report
    Nov 26th 2012, 10:50 AM

    “an insult to our intelligence”…….mmmmmmm?

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paddy Rooney
    Favourite Paddy Rooney
    Report
    Nov 26th 2012, 10:13 AM

    Has the Dáil ever had a free vote recently, it must be one of the world’s most whipped parliaments.

    21
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Colm OConnor
    Favourite Colm OConnor
    Report
    Nov 26th 2012, 6:09 PM

    Any TD who votes no is blocking the democratic will of the people. No TD should even countenance voting no.

    In terms of abortion in general, I don’t think parties should have policies other than a commitment to hold referenda or not. That said, every candidate should state the way they would vote on such matters before the election.

    5
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Barry McSweeney
    Favourite Barry McSweeney
    Report
    Nov 26th 2012, 5:48 PM
    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Dermot O'Reilly
    Favourite Dermot O'Reilly
    Report
    Dec 19th 2012, 9:40 PM

    A free vote for all TDs is essential. Otherwise we will have a dictatorship headed by Dictator Enda!

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Dermot O'Reilly
    Favourite Dermot O'Reilly
    Report
    Dec 19th 2012, 9:35 PM

    Some say that the Supreme Court decision on the X case is probably incorrect and unconstitutional. If true why has the Expert Committee of Advisers not recommended a review of the X case before recommending legislation.FG gave a or election commitment that it would NOT legislate for abortion.It is now doing so. FG has adopted the policies of the Labour Party on abortion. If the government do not reassess its position FG will be wiped out at the next election. Remember the VAT on children’s shoes! Sad!

    1
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.