Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

'It's about parental equality': Citizens' Assembly will not hear from fathers' group

The group argues the future of an embryo or a child should be a collaborative decision.

AN ORGANISATION CAMPAIGNING for fathers’ rights has said it is disappointed at its exclusion from the Citizens’ Assembly in the debate about the Eighth Amendment.

Fathers4Justice, a campaigning group best known publicity stunts that usually involve a man dressed as a superhero scaling a high-profile building, made a submission to the assembly. Founder Matt O’Connor, was this week told assembly members will not be hearing from them.

Readers may remember O’Connor’s unexpected appearance on stage at the Rose of Tralee last year, dressed as a priest. Speaking to TheJournal.ie this week, he said his organisation is not taking a stance on whether the Eighth Amendment should be repealed, rather they are calling for fathers’ voices to be heard in the debate.

“We’re asking: Should mothers and fathers have an equal say about whether they want to become parents?” he said. “There is a legitimate question there to be asked.”

In its submission to the assembly, the group points out the “biological fact that it takes a man and a woman to create a child and that men will have a vote in this referendum”.

The group argues that the future of an embryo or a child should be a “collaborative decision” and that research shows this is already the case in most situations.

“Should the Eighth Amendment be amended to include or acknowledge the rights of fathers in this process?” O’Connor asked. Should the Irish Constitution be changed to acknowledge fathers?”

It’s about parental equality and should you have a say or not.

O’Connor was reluctant to suggest new wording that would include fathers as he said he recognised this was a “complex issue”.

“We’re not saying we have the answers to this, we just want the questions to be asked.”

“Men have feelings and views on this and they care and they love their children and their partners. They can be upset depending on the circumstances and what happens and I think we just need to think about it,” he added.

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
86 Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds