Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
A JUNIOR MINISTER has admitted that some Labour TDs, including himself, may miss today’s Dáil vote on Clare Daly’s fatal foetal abnormality bill.
Kevin Humphreys, the junior social protection minister, told Morning Ireland that it may not be because of the particular vote but because “a Dáil deputy’s schedule is a very busy schedule”.
His comments come as party colleague, Anne Ferris, prepares to oppose her party and vote for Daly’s bill. The vote is due to take place in the Dáil at 5pm. The government is opposing the bill on the advice of the Attorney General that it is unconstitutional.
“First of all it’s a Tuesday, many people have the different things to do, and different commitments. I myself may not be in the chamber because I’m taking legislation through the Seanad today,” Humphreys explained.
“So there may be people missing. It may not be because they’re particularly missing to avoid the vote.”
He added: “I would say the maximum number of Labour TDs that are there, are present, will be in the house and will vote with the party.
Minister Kevin Humphreys says he's surprised by Anne Ferris's decision to support Clare Daly's bill. "I'm disappointed." #morningireland
Humphreys said that he was surprised by party colleague Ferris’s decision to defy the party whip and support the bill but said the advice was that it was unconstitutional.
However, he added: ”In principle, what Clare Daly has said, I agree with it.
“It’s not really the right thing to do to put a woman on a place to go over and have an abortion when the foetus isn’t viable, is not going to survive and make her go through that nine months. A woman in that position should have a choice.”
The Dublin South-East TD also appeared to agree that the Attorney General’s advice to government on this issue should be published and said that the wider issue was the need to repeal the 8th Amendment.
Speaking on his way into cabinet this morning, Public Expenditure Minister Brendan Howlin said Labour had a long record of campaigning on issues surrounding abortion law, but that the bill being proposed would be “cruel”.
“We want to give real redress to these people, real solutions to these people, not enact legislation that constitutionally is infirm and therefore will have no effect for them. That, I believe, would be cruel.”
Sam Boal / Photocall Ireland
Sam Boal / Photocall Ireland / Photocall Ireland
Elsewhere, while Sinn Féin plans to abstain on tonight’s vote, Fianna Fáil will allow free vote.
The party’s health spokesperson Billy Kelleher plans to vote for Daly’s bill while its children’s spokesperson Robert Troy said he remained undecided.
“I believe the idea of a free vote would allow this parliament to mature and have a very open debate on this issue, that it wouldn’t come down hard and fast on party lines,” Kelleher said.
Speaking outside Leinster House today, Kelleher called on the government parties to allow a free vote among their TDs, arguing the constitutionality of the bill can only be tested by the Supreme Court.
The Cork North-Central TD added: “I don’t see why the parliament is always obliged to take the Attorney General’s advice. The government is, but the Dáil certainly isn’t.”
Last night, Anne Ferris confirmed her intentions in an interview on RTÉ’s Claire Byrne Live last night, saying: ”It is a matter of principle for me.”
The Wicklow TD will automatically forfeit the Labour whip with her vote against the government, the party’s chief whip Emmet Stagg confirmed to TheJournal.ie last night.
Speaking to RTÉ, Ferris said she was willing to accept the consequences of her decision if it results in her being expelled from the Labour Party.
The bill is above politics.
Advertisement
Ferris said that she has been campaigning for this all her adult life.
“I am pro-choice and I make no apologies for it.”
She clarified that the vote today will not enact legislation, but is merely allowing it to go on to Committee Stage, where the bill will be gone through line-by-line by legal experts.
Ferris said that Tánaiste Joan Burton had not been in contact with her about her decision or the impending vote.
Labour TD Anne Ferris confirms she will vote against her party on Clare Daly’s bill tomorrow, says legislation is “above politics”.
There is growing unease among backbenchers at the prospect of the government again opposing a bill from the United Left TD that was debated in the Dáil last Friday.
Labour will hold a special briefing on the legal advice from the Attorney General in a bid to convince uneasy TDs of the reasons why it must be opposed.
This is set to take place at 3.30pm today before a Dáil vote sometime after 5pm.
The bill would provide for two suitably qualified medical professionals (an obstetrician and a perinatologist) to jointly certify in good faith that the foetus in question is suffering from a fatal foetal abnormality.
Proponents of it have argued it does not confer any new rights in relation to abortion, merely clarifies existing rights and, they argue, it is constitutional.
However, speaking for the government last Friday, Health Minister Leo Varadkar said the bill was flawed legislation and would require a referendum which the government has no mandate to do.
Labour’s official party policy is to seek the repeal of the 8th Amendment which provides the mother and unborn child with an equal right to life. But the party argues it currently has no mandate for a referendum and would seek one after the next election.
Just one Labour TD, Joanna Tuffy, spoke on the bill last Friday, saying she believed it was unconstitutional.
Other TDssaid to be particularly uneasy about opposing Daly’s legislation are Ciara Conway and Michael McNamara. Several Labour TDs contacted by TheJournal.ie yesterday did not return comment.
It’s thought that several could fail to show up for today’s vote as happened last December when 13 Labour deputies failed to show for a vote on a bill that would have provided for a referendum to repeal the 8th Amendment.
Dublin Mid-West deputy Robert Dowds said the issue could not be tackled until the 8th Amendment is repealed, and added: ”That won’t be until after the next general election.”
Free vote calls
There have been calls on the Labour leadership to allow its TDs a free vote on the legislation.
However, this could prove problematic as a whip was applied to Fine Gael TDs during the debate on the Protection of Life during Pregnancy Bill in 2013 and several members of the senior coalition partner were expelled for opposing the government.
Speaking to LMFM yesterday morning Meath East TD Dominic Hannigan said that he didn’t know why the AG’s advice was that the bill is unconstitutional.
“I want to hear what the legal expert says before I make up my mind,” he said.
He said that many within the party would “love to support Clare’s bill” and added that the “time has come for legislation on this”.
- additional reporting Christina Finn and Daragh Brophy
First published 10.22am on Monday, 09 February 2015
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
@Jack McGready: The government should now move to apply the 12.5% rate on everything that flows through Ireland, not just Irish sales. To eliminate this talk once and for all.
The multinationals would still prefer it to paying 30% in France but we would be Norway rich!
Why crib? Corporations & multinationals dont have the vote.
Just vote to give citizens living overseas the vote and then we’ll sort out the individuals’ tax woes.
We need a reversal of VAT/Corporate Tax, ie: 22% corporate tax & 12.5% VAT.
How about a new Political Party:
-The Tax Justice Party
-cloud funded
-Tax Policy: Corporate Tax, Individual Tax & VAT set annually at the average rates of the EZ
-That all Irish Citizens are permitted to vote (Stop selling Citizenship to all not born in the island of Ireland & phase out existing citizenship for those
living abroad who were not born in the island of Ireland (Bord Failte using
easy citizenship to Americans who have an Irish ancestor is absurd and
devalues genuine citizenship with full citizen rights including the right to vote)
-Budget health , education & welfare at the EZ average
Let’s face it , if we are genuine about being wanting to be Europeans then what’s wrong with a political/economic policy which aims at the EZ average.?
Perhaps we dont have the self confidence to compete with our EZ peers on a level playing field. It would seem that we prefer to be smartassed as opposed to being smart?
@Sean Conway: It isn’t wealthy individuals that are not paying tax. If you work for Apple here and earn, say, €100,000 the state will quite happily take as much of that as it can get, far more in fact than the UK or most European nations. It’s corporate profits that are the issue in this.
Wow, if Paschal Donohoe and the Dept of Finance say that Ireland isn’t a tax haven, then it must be true. Because as we all know, they are great at explaining anything away with their mumbo jumbo management speak. What a douche.
@Ron O’Keefe:
I’m becoming more and more convinced that Pascal is a programmed humanoid.
Either that or he just loves taking the pith out of the public.
Setting a minimum tax liability for the multinationals of a paltry 6%, less than HALF of the normal rate, would bring in billions extra and would solve our housing national emergency in the medium term.
@The Risen: Its not that simple. The rate is irrelevant. What’s relevant is what are you applying that rate to. Most multinationals, don’t have a defined revenue stream in Ireland. They bill other entities of the same company in other EU countries for their products or services. Basically they set the price and hence define the revenue and profit for the selling entity. It’s known as transfer pricing. This allows a multinational to increase profits in low tax countries like Ireland. The internal pricing is agreed with the Irish Revenue. And it tends to be a percentage of cost. so they more you pump into the Irish economy the less tax you pay. Its very clever from an Irish point of view.
The corporates don’t pay the taxes, their employees do however. We’ve one of lowest entry point to the higher tax band in europe at 33,800. The UK is £46k sterling before 40% kicks in.
@Joshua Walsh: Not to mention that many things which are free at point of use in the UK (GPs, hospitals, university admission and books, the list is endless) are charged for here so that what you are left with doesn’t go as far. Then there is the higher VAT rates, VRT on cars, higher insurance costs…
Its the dept of finance job to protect its hidden tax haven status, GDP growing by 26% in 2015 thanks to apple. Wasting taxpayer funds fighting the European commission to protect one multinational knowing that Ireland can’t win only delaying and giving apple cover.
Our labour market is distorted thanks to our tax haven status creating manufacturing jobs in china while we pay more to Europe because our GDP on paper is higher.
Irish people can’t afford homes because that’s another market that completely distorted even the mafia cleans its money on our shores. we allow multinationals to steal other European countries taxes and profit little ourselves.
We have the best paid politicians on this planet who rule without ever worrying about a conflict of interest because they are all at it. Just like the guards and penalty points, no politician will every face justice because we would need to jail they lot.
@leartius: But leartius, don’t you realise some people on here know someone who know someone who works for Intel or Google or Ebay or PayPal or Apple? Their jobs are far more important than the law, justice, morality, fairness, or any of that oul nonsense!
Just from a pragmatic perspective, if Ireland is the base of global operations and they move all non-US profits to Ireland, then to the US via the Caribbean, as long as they are paying EU tax compliant corporation tax rates on those profits, then we are not a tax haven. If we don’t apply those rates through either independent deals to hide or evade those, it is corruption, not systemic tax evasion. We are facilitating lapses in the home countries tax systems, especially the US, but not a tax haven.
@Gulliver Foyle: but if the profits are booked in Ireland and never repatriated to US or anywhere else for that matter and these global corporations are paying negligible amounts of tax then clearly that makes Ireland a tax haven, regardless of the dictionary definition of that term.
The state of this comment section… Zero understanding of global taxation and no interest in trying to understand it. They just wanna sound off and say something populist. Thejournal.ie have linked the research paper at the top. I encourage folks to read it and reflect on why Ireland topped the global list, the nature of the balance sheet items on Irish entities relative to employee numbers and how as a services economy connecting the US to the EU, the results become inevitable. Especially considering the size of the companies relative to the domestic population… Sorry, I meant, that Pascal fella, some fool eh…
@Ciarán Ó Fallúin: You cant expect the anti everything crowd to spend their time actually informing themselves of the facts about taxation, what would they complain about in the comments section if they couldn’t ignorantly talk about apples 13 billion?
@Ciarán Ó Fallúin: so what your saying is people have it all wrong and that we should encourage the little or no paying of tax by multinationals because we don’t understand the great global taxation plan……ok maybe explain that to the Irish businesses who employ people and who don’t get those sweet heart deals, seems to me if we gonna give it to one why not all companies. Imagine the help this would give struggling Irish businesses who are paying and playing by the rules…..funny that
@Ian McNally: must be great to think you know more than the rest…..and despite what you may have gotten about people’s understanding of this taxation issue, people can see that yes it’s helping employee people and that brings in taxes another way, but also makes a mockery of the likes of the government and IDA etc telling us these companies are here for the great workforce and the rest when it’s only a small percentage of the reason and as I pointed out since we feel so generous giving these deals to multinationals, why not just give it to Irish companies who won’t upsticks and leave when something better comes along……just a thought of a simple lad you think doesn’t understand the global taxation plans
@Ciarán Ó Fallúin: it’s good for Ireland in that we get to keep a very small fraction of the forgone tax (200bn annually in the EU) and that helps our economy but we are a global pariah for doing so. Let me put it to you this way. If somebody showed up and said let me sell hot dogs from your front garden and I’ll give you 2% of my takings. Steady income rolling in for us but obvious downsides for all the neighbours. Now do you get it Ciaran with all the fadas? Simple when someone explains it to you really. For tonight’s homework I want you to do the 2 times tables and read page 4 from Ann and Barry.
@Thomas Michael Newell: and yet you still refuse to accept that we arent by any definitionof the term a tax haven, the double irish issue which is what you are refferring is also now no longer possible and will be completely gone by 2021, the narative that we are the worst culprit of this is also incorrect the netherlands dutch sandwich example is far worse, also France who constantly like to hit us as they have a published rate double ours but in reality it is about the same as ours once all their loopholes come into effect, so yes i do believe you dont know anything about this subject. And finally if all the above is true, which it is, then your reasoning that they are primarily here for the tax is completely incorrect.
It’s a disgusting practice the department of revenue do the VRT tax it’s an illegal tax they do what they went and allow company’s pay little tax
It’s a bloody joke the sooner the better they sit in front of the EEC and face vast fines for what they are doing
@laurence o neill: VRT is a disgrace, but it’s not unique to Eire. Netherlands, Luxembourg too AFAIK also have the equivalent. The state attitude is only rich ( that is people who work) people run cars, so they can afford it. Can’t be having (little) people not paying tax now, sure we’d be a tax haven then!
@Jack Goff: We would be back in Ireland post 1990 or probably a lot worse with our debt levels…..basically broke and every Tom Dick and Harry looking for work in other countries, but these countries are fast pulling up the draw bridges to new migrants, so it would be very interested to see what would happen to our unemployed masses if they did pull out…..
@Jack Goff: and the complete over reliance on them means at the drop of a hat they can leave and we are screwed……maybe give these deals to some Irish companies who actually are here cos they want to be not cos we are effectively bribe and begging them
@Jack Goff: Same argument many companies have made to explain why they didn’t pay their employer’s PRSI contributions, if I did I’d have had to close down. Apple et al employ precisely the minimum number they need here, many of whom by the way are US citizens who have moved over, arguably taking a job from an Irish person. Tax fraud is tax fraud, if we ignore morality then ‘but the slaves are keeping the economy going’. If employment is based on robbing our EU partners and the USA of their rightful taxes we should stop doing that and accept the job losses. It’s called not being a banana republic.
Paul Krugman was right this is Lepreachaun economics accounts for 26% growth rate in 2016, meanwhile the EU federalists are biding their time until post brexit , and they come after our 12% corporation rate. They are keeping their powder dry for the moment , because they are using us as a stick to beat the nasty Brits with for the time being, when that is done all bets are off, if it walks like a duck and if it quacks like a duck it`s usually a duck I find
@Patrick James Walsh: Just a matter of time and it won’t be just the EU, President Trump’s USA and Canada and the rest of the OECD want their due. I hope they get it as well. Time to stop the theft.
I don’t particularly care if we’re a tax haven or not. We need jobs, skilled and well paid ones. And we should use every weapon in our arsenal to beat our EU partners into submission at every given opportunity.
@mike scott: Ah the true voice of I’m all right jack. Mixed with the usual Irish nationalist delusion that a tiny state can beat a massive entity like the EU. Cop yourself on.
Ireland has full tax autonomy, given by the EU if Lisbon mk 2 was passed. The government can set any tax rate they like if it means attracting multi-national companies to set up in Ireland. Whether you think that is right or wrong just remember it has the EU’s blessing.
@John Hagin Meade: If you had followed any of this you would know that the EU is not complaining about the 12.5% rate. It is complaining that Apple et al are not even paying 1%.
“We’re phasing out” – not “We’ve completely phased out”
“We’ve made many of the changes requied” – not “We’ve made all the changes required”
Do we believe the finance minister or real economists at the University of California @ Berkley along with the Danes ?
Off topic, post Brexit is our EU contribution based on GDP or GNI ? – hope it’s the latter.
It is a tax haven. Study after study says it is. Of course our own central bank and politicians are going to reject this every time. Its not in our interest to be seen as such, but the fact is we are and we are seen as this.
If companies are setting up based on your tax model, then you’re a tax haven.
I will say that Ireland does offer more than just being a tax haven, like say, our neighbours Isle of Man, the difference is we do have other benefits, well educated workforce, robust company laws, ease to set up, etc… but these cannot still take away the fact that we are a tax haven. The US is also a tax haven, if you look at certain states like Delaware
Small and medium companies here pay 12.5%. Apple, Google, EBay and the rest don’t even pay 1%, FG need to rethink their attitude to this and own up. It’s at odds with their law and order policy, with fairness and with being a good EU member.
Ah,so that’s why we are doing business with China,,the beef deal and big Bio Pharma company proposed for Dundalk, once you mix with China,its bye bye small fry
Overweight and sweaty, Mr. Parsons swallows the Party lines whole. In addition to having to endure him as a neighbor, Winston has to work with the man. His unblinking acceptance of the Doctrine makes Winston think Parsons will never be vaporized. But he is surprised in the end to find him at the Ministry of Love, no poorer for having been denounced by his horrible children.
'Ireland was very smart': Trump namechecks Ireland as he pledges tariffs on pharma imports
Keith Kelly
9 hrs ago
47.8k
113
votail
Opposition to consider 'all options' to counter official Dáil record due to conflicting claims
39 mins ago
1.6k
16
As it happened
Verona Murphy 'fully intends' to continue as Ceann Comhairle as opposition parties draft no confidence motion
13 hrs ago
54.1k
101
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 160 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 110 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 142 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 112 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 38 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 34 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 133 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 59 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 88 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say