We need your help now
Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
By continuing, you are indicating that you accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
BRIDES AND GROOMS are continuing to marry at an older age according to new stats released by the Central Statistics Office.
Figures for 2016 show that the average age of a groom in an opposite-sex marriage is now 35.7 years compared to 35.3 years in 2015. That translates to grooms being an average of about five months older.
Brides in an opposite-sex couple now marry at an average age of 33.8 years compared to 33.2 years last year. That’s about seven months older.
In same-sex marriages the partners are generally older when they marry. Men in same-sex marriages are 40.5 years on average while women are 41.
The trend in the increasing average age for brides and grooms has been rising year-on-year with 2016 the oldest in both cases.
“In the past 50 years, the average age of grooms decreased from 29 years in 1966 to a low of 26.2 years in 1977 and increased to a high of 35.7 years in 2016,” the CSO stated today.
A similar trend is evident for brides with the average age decreasing from 25.7 in 1966 to 24.0 in 1977 and increasing to a high of 33.8 in 2016.
Grooms were older than brides in 62.3% of opposite-sex marriages.
Marriage equality
In the first full year in which same-sex couples could marry, there were 1,056 such unions in 2016, making up 4.7% of all marriages in the State.
In the case of same-sex marriages, the majority (56.6%) of those who married were previously single while 39.8% had previously been in a civil partnership.
Seven civil partnership ceremonies were performed last year.
In the case of opposite sex couples, 87.8% of marriages were the first marriage for both the bride and groom.
There were 2,444 marriages involving at least one divorced person in 2016, including 552 marriages where both parties were divorced.
Take me to church
In 2016, religious ceremonies accounted for 64.8% of all marriages with Catholic ceremonies the largest of that group at 53.7%.
The majority of non-religious ceremonies were civil marriages at 28.5% of all marriages.
Same-sex couples were far less likely to have a religious ceremony with 80.5% of such marriages being civil ceremonies. The next most popular way for same-sex couples to marry was in Humanists ceremonies at 9.2% of ceremonies.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Yeeaahhhhh, what happened all the Inspectorate recommendations?
Review will be carried out..government witless specimen wheels out ‘we remained committed to implementing these findings blah blah blah’..report goes on a shelf and nothing changes.
A fig leaf for the Independence to hide behind, on the vote of no confidence tonight…..
@Harry Price: varadkar calls for Mc Cabes questions to be answered just pulled from the journal after 3 views Hmmm before the vote in the dail? run with it journal..
Definitely a question to add to the list for when the next round of elections send people to the door to beg.
@Tony Canning: 19;18 and still the story is missing, Varadakar calls for McCabes questions to be answered now. was the headline, don’t understand it, its a story so why redact it before tonights vote?
So what international expert is going to carry out a review of the useless bunch we have in the Dáil…???
Knowing the journal it’s probably being corrected. In the meantime: http://www.irishexaminer.com/breakingnews/ireland/leo-varadkar-maurice-mccabe-deserves-a-full-and-unequivocal-apology-from-govt-777318.html
@ Harry. It was a despicable thing to accuse you of and the garda harassment was/is totally unwarranted and hopefully those that accused and indeed allowed the accusations to be printed should be sued. I happen to know you quite well and I can with my hand on my heart say that you are not an abuser of any kind and in fact you are a gentleman. These accusers that hide behind pseudonym’s will be found out and hopefully charged & sued.
Spot on Peadar. The bogus Independents have now stood in support of family home evictions, Apple’s tax dodging and continued corruption at the most senior levels of the Gardai. Any other betrayals that I’ve missed?
We have seen this before. He/she will write a report and government will put it on the report shelf and ignore the contents.
@Stephen Brady: its a game with the shams
http://www.irishexaminer.com/ireland/paul-murphy-td-commissioners-husband-had-role-442944.html
lack of lawer intervention like in dob’s case’s leads to only one conclusion, guilt
This is a joke fg has to go they are incompetent politicians children are suffering in this country because of ff fg policy call an election.
They’ll probably get the same lad in that done the review of the FAI..
@Dusty Mooney: The Independent Alliance members= BULL shitters who can we trust now? Watch the pension – cover thine own arse as long as possible
@ciaran: seeing that the Journal ie removed my fact printed herein just now …….is what i expect from a dictatorship ..can i ask why did you the journal allow the mob attack my character during the gardai dispute by way of insightment
Didn’t the Morris tribunal recommend this and pointed to systemic changes necessary within an Garda, after what came to light in Donegal years ago. Wasn’t that on FFs watch???
@Harry Price: will you the journal now put back the article that you removed in the interest of truth
@Brian Mulligan: this disturbing interview tells the story of how deep the corruption and collusion of the guards and Tusla has actually gone.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfJ9xdfq7Fs
reviews and tribunals are a complete waste of time its convictions and punishment we need, any garda will tell you that
In this case gardai wont tell you we need convictions or in mc cabe case because its gardai who will be convicted of any crimes
@Ciaran What do you do when the truth is not told Lies are been told in the Dail lies will be told in front of a Judge as happened before Lock up at least four of the main players . Job done.
It’s an empty political gesture which keeps the Independent Alliance happy.
@Tony Daly: F/G announced they will engage with Chief Chauncey “Clancy” Wiggum from Springfield to head up the overview of Garda Síochána,,,,DOHHHHHHH
My advice to this expert.
Cover your a** at every turn.
@Emmet O’Keeffe: Yes, but did you see how quickly it was announced – this independent review – now that FG heads are on the line? Days.
And Varadkar is going to make a speech tonight and it will be his play for the leadership. He’s going to capitalise on this and make himself out as Mr nice guy. He makes my skin crawl now.
Kenny is on the way out, Varadkar and Coveney today told TDs to be ready for an early election. Kenny has a few weeks left if he’s lucky. They’ll send him off to the US for Paddy’s day as they can;t send that dope Varadkar as he has stated Trump should;t be invited to Ireland. That was silly popularism on his behalf and it will come back to bite him in him in the ass. My money is on Coveney to win it, and for the nub of political power to move to Cork for the next few years as Martin will be Taoiseach and FG will prop them up under Coveney.
@Mr Snuffleupagus:
I hope you’re right. Varadkar is a neo liberalist Thatcherite with no real concept of a republic with any socialist dimension.
“We considered it” Yeah and then realised what the electorate would do to you at the polling station so decided to kep your noses firmly in the trough. Sickening to think they’ll all survive this relatively unscathed.
Why have the Independent Alliance and Fianna Fáil not pulled the plug??? Bloody disgrace. Edna caught in a bare faced lie and we are supposed to trust this shower of nincompoops in Brexit negotiations. And Noonan meeting Cerebus a day before the sale of project Eagle. Sick of the whole lot of them. Basturds
It would be a dangerous job for anyone with children.
enough reviews and apologies too little too late.
So, a toothless, powerless paper tiger ‘review’ whose findings can and will most likely be ignored.
We need a criminal investigation headed by a team brought in from outside this rotten little state.
Just like when O’Sullivan replaced Callinan, the government gives a nod and wink to senior Gardai and exclaims ‘As you were lads’…..
Sorry shinnerbot, don’t think one of your beloved paramilitary Kangaroo Courts would appropriate in the circumstances…
Crawl back under your rock monkey man.Fine Gael and Fianna Fail are 2cheeks of the same corrupted arse.
@Diarmuid: Jebus what a small minded snipe of a statement
Current head of the Garda inspectorate is an ex Chicago chief of police, surely this would cover the international investigation rather than creating another investigative body? I’m open to correction, but couldn’t the current inspectorate bring criminal charges of anything is found to be out of order? Does this mean the IA don’t have faith in the current inspectorate and how can the commissioner remain in place if this investigation goes ahead??
I would say it means bringing in an independent investigator. I wouldn’t say a currently employed member qualifies. I’d say they could and it hasn’t been done. Therefore…
So, an international “Policing Expert” will carry out a “review”? Great. To go along with the Inspectorate Report. Will the Policing Expert then have a role to implement his/her recommendations? To go along with the Garda Inspectorate, Garda Siochana Ombudsman Commission and the Independent Policing Authority? And will the government, Garda Commissioner and her Garda management team ever take a single bit of notice of anything they say? And what happens when the Tribunal is over in 2025, after we give several million € in the form of €3,000 a day to every Senior Counsel that can grab their own ass with both hands? We can all settle down now so and get busy forgetting out the stitch up job they did on MMcC
Former Boston Police Chief did that in 2007. The Garda staff stonewalled her every move. Read her findings. Why repeat the exercise? Of course they ignored her recommendations. I.E. we still have a couple thousand Gardai doing office chores. A meager attempt is being made to hire a couple hundred civilians. Oh and btw, our government needs a root/branch relaunch!!!
FF actually support FG and has been trying to direct it out of this mess.
Independent Alliance has received a face saving gesture.
All politicians are happy.
Tony Daly. Endapendant Alliance would be more like it.
Isn’t that why Kathleen O’Toole was brought in from BPD?
How did that work out?
Same old, same old, same old.
AGS assert that it did nothing wrong and that this is a matter for HSE and TUSLA.
Senior Garda Management needs expert training on how properly and effectively to fit up whistleblowers.
They’ll plant some kiddie porn on him
Independent Alliance can funk right off. They have “been very supportive of Maurice McCabe and his family.” but where disturbed to hear of the allegations?…Enjoy your pensions, gents.
Hopefully next will be the Judiciary and then the whole Legal profession
Where is Ms O’Toole? Hibernation??
This is no good
These parasites will only change when people on the streets protest.Their not going to hang each other because of a few Comments here and there,Rte have been casual at best interviewing Fine Gael,a clear out there is needed too.Fine gaels corrupt ways may yet see people marching if Kenny stays after being caught lying again.
Hope they start at the top……..
Didn’t we get this already with Kathleen O Toole from Boston??? http://www.justice.ie/en/JELR/Pages/PR07000914
Please please please can we get an actual expert who knows policing and will have the time and authority to do a complete down and dirty review? Instead of the Inspectorate which is ignored when it doesnt suit and can only access and speak with rank and file Gardai while the Super / Management are standing in the room doing cut throat motions?
If an election is called, there is unfortunately too great a chance for certain ministers not turning up at any investigation that is going to happen, trust me they will have excuses, but those involved should step aside from their duties in the meantime. An election I presume will then happen.
Imagine, we can’t trust our own police, judiciary or legal profession to find and report the truth, there really is no hope
There is no independent investigator appointed and there will not be. This outfit will make recommendations like many before them and those recommendations will be ignored. This has happened several times before, there was the gang of 3 many years ago, there was the Morris report which made recommendations. We know from all this there will be no change.
What a stunt. The national leader tells pure lie after lie, along with our the second in command, in official statements and then to the media and the House . After a week of lies, the politicians seems to be excluded from every form of reform or investigation.
Every house journalist and every house member has known about this file for at least 12 months, listen to any podcasts on it over past two weeks, it existed originally in the HSE referred to Tusla and Garda, but now somehow it’s the Garda that are responsible for all knowledge of it to everyone and the accountability for the report is initially with the HSE. Tusla and HSE it would seem do not need REFORM in being ultimately responsible for accusing an innocent man of child abuse. A Greater respect to the left everyday they at least acknowledge political reform is what this country needs the rest will follow.
Soundbites
What a load of nonsense.
Why bother! He’ll make loads of recommendations that will fall on deaf ears. One of the worst equipped police forces in the world!
I am watching the Dail Depate on TV. Fine Gael’s answer to their torment of Gardai is to harrang Sinn Fein for killing Gardai. In other words, because Sinn Fein IRA killed Guards, its all right for Fine Gael to tell lies about their Gardai.
I said before, don’t vote in the next election, I now say, don’t vote, but I except, Roisin Shorthall, Mike Wallace and Michael Fitzmaurice. They are the exception
This disturbing interview tells the story of how deep the corruption and collusion of the guards and Tusla has actually gone.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfJ9xdfq7Fs
We have had enough endless reports tribunals commissions and toothless (so called) oversight of the guards for years and nothing has changed except it now come to this crisis, which is now attracting international attention.
We have a corrupt police force and a commissioner and top brass who cannot be sacked because they are entitled to due process.
How these people think they can have any respect and confidence with the rank and file ,and the ordinary citizen is beyond my comprehension.
If you were running a sweet shop and couldn`t do your job, you would be removed.
If you are in charge of the security and safety of the citizens and the country itself ,you cannot be asked to step aside, even if if you and your colleagues are the subject of tribunal . Welcome to Ireland 2017.(Not Russia, Zimbabwe or any so called south American banana republic)
@Patrick James Walsh: Boomtown Rats Banana Republic is apt for a new anthem or the sketch of Father Ted with the car and the song ghost town comes to mind.
I thought in this post Brexit post trump post truth world we were to ‘ignore the experts’ and listen to the fringe?
Seriously just fire O’sullivan and bring in a commissioner from the outside. She is not the only one at fault but she should not have been given the job day one.
Another one…
Root and Branch report will sit on the other expert external reports gathering dust in the bottom of some civil servant office. The only people happy will be the so called experts from the UK the the west brit Fine Gaelers will bring in to put manners on the whistle blowers showing up their private security firm e.g. the Garda. The legal profession to make a financial killing. Root and Branch report will be handed over the Special Branch sitting in the trees turning the report into paper aeroplanes.
Even the Garda who call for informers all the time hate it when one of their own blows the whistle
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say