Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Carolyn Kaster/AP/Press Association Images

US Supreme Court says law banning benefits for gay couples is unconstitutional

In a landmark ruling for same-sex marriage couples, the court has said the Defence of Marriage Act – enacted 17 years ago during the Bill Clinton administration – is unconstitutional.

THE UNITED STATES Supreme Court has struck down a law which defines marriage as between a man and a woman and restricts the payment of federal benefits to couples of opposite sex, denying same-sex couples those same benefits.

In a landmark ruling for same-sex marriage couples, the court has said the Defence of Marriage Act (DOMA) – enacted 17 years ago during the Bill Clinton administration – is unconstitutional.

“DOMA is unconstitutional as a deprivation of the equal liberty of persons that is protected by the Fifth Amendment,” the justices said in a 5 to 4 ruling issued today.

Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote the majority opinion which strikes down DOMA, a law that has prevented married gay couples from receiving a range of tax, health and retirement benefits.

Same-sex marriage has been adopted by 12 states and the District of Columbia. Another 18,000 couples were married in California during a brief period when same-sex unions were legal there.

“Under DOMA, same-sex married couples have their lives burdened, by reason of government decree, in visible and public ways,” Kennedy said. “DOMA’s principal effect is to identify a subset of state-sanctioned marriages and make them unequal.”

Proposition 8

He was joined by the court’s four liberal justices. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Samuel Alito, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas dissented.

Scalia read his dissent aloud. Scalia said the court should not have decided the case. But, given that it did, he said, “we have no power under the Constitution to invalidate this democratically adopted legislation.”

The law was passed in 1996 by broad majorities in the House of Representatives and the Senate, and signed into law by Democratic President Bill Clinton. Since then, many lawmakers who voted for the law and Clinton have renounced their support.

In another ruling issued today, the highest court in the US ruled that the state of California’s ban on same-sex marriage in that state, so-called Proposition 8, is not a case it is willing to take up.

This means that a US Court of Appeals decision to rescind Proposition 8 – enacted in 2008 – stands and therefore gay marriage is legal in California. The decision was a 5-4 ruling by the court.

In not taking up the case, the court has indicated that there is no scope currently to issue a federal ruling on the legality of same-sex marriage which is explicitly banned in a number of states.

- additional reporting from Associated Press

Britain: Cameron faces dissent in the ranks over gay marriage bill

France: ‘Marriage for all’ in France as Hollande signs a bill and makes it law

Brazil: Brazil gives ‘green light’ to same-sex marriage

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Author
Hugh O'Connell
View 37 comments
Close
37 Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds