Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Tom McFeely leaving the Four Courts in Dublin today after winning his Supreme Court appeal. Laura Hutton/Photocall Ireland

Dublin City Council says it is focused on finding Priory Hall solution

The council has been criticised by residents at Priory Hall for mishandling the case against the developer Tom McFeely who won his Supreme Court appeal today.

DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL has said that it is focused on finding a solution to the issues concerning Priory Hall following today’s Supreme Court ruling.

The court ruled in favour of the developer of Priory Hall, Thomas McFeely, who had appealed a contempt of court ruling, a three month prison sentence and a €1 million fine for failing to carry out repair works at the apartment complex in North Dublin.

Priory Hall was evacuated last October, leaving 256 residents in temporary accommodation.

Today, the Supreme Court found that McFeely could not be in breach of the court order to carry out repairs because he had been ordered to vacate the site.

Dublin City Council had requested that McFeely be removed from the site which led to accusations by former residents of the empty apartment complex that the Council had mishandled the process.

DCC defended their actions in a statement saying that their focus now as it always has been is to “find a solution” to the issues surrounding Priory Hall.

In a statement, DCC said: “In the course of her judgement the Chief Justice acknowledged that the approach of the City Council seeking the appointment of a substitute contractor to complete outstanding fire safety works at Priory Hall and seeking Mr McFeely to pay for same, was adopted bona fide and in the best interests of the tenants.

“The Chief Justice however, goes on to find that by virtue of the orders made it was not possible for Mr McFeely to comply with the orders of the High Court and on this basis the appeal was allowed.

“The focus of the Council is the same now as it was at the beginning of the process and that is to find a solution to the issues concerning Priory Hall.

“In this regard we are working within the resolution process to try and bring forward proposals which could form a resolution of the situation in the long term.”

Read: Developer Thomas McFeely wins Supreme Court appeal over Priory Hall

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
21 Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds