Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
After 15 years of the Tribunal of Inquiry Into Certain Planning Matters and Payments - and various other public inquiries into different walks of Irish political life – the Irish public cannot be blamed for having Tribunal Fatigue.
So, when over the past three weeks, they started creeping back onto our newspapers’ front pages, there may not have been the attention given to it as before.
If you’re suffering from hazy memories and need to catch up, here’s everything that’s been happening.
Ah, hold on now, which Tribunal are we even talking about again?
The Mahon Tribunal. But you’re right to be a little confused. It was also known as the Flood Tribunal as it was initially headed by Judge Feargus Flood.
It was an inquiry into “certain planning matters and payments”. It was set up 1997 to investigate allegations of corrupt payments to politicians in relation to planning and re-zoning decisions.
It had a large focus on the Dublin County Council area in the 1990s.
Sitting for almost 15 years (that’s more than 900 days total), it was the longest running public inquiry in the State’s history.
We wrote a handy timeline of how it came about here. But the short version: there were countless numbers of allegations made against public representatives about how they did their business. Hundreds of witnesses were called – some that were less than reliable – and eventually a final report which ran to 3,270 pages was published.
Who did it make findings against?
Tribunal findings are never straightforward. People can’t be put into neat ‘good’ and ‘bold’ columns. It is part of the intrigue, and also part of the frustration.
So, we’ll try and give you the pertinent ones here.
The final report from the Tribunal, issued in March 2012, said that corruption affected “every level of Irish political life”, noting that it was allowed to continue unabated.
It concluded that Bertie Ahern did not ‘truthfully’ account for lodgements of over £165,000. However, it did not brand the former Taoiseach corrupt.
Mahon ruled that former TD Liam Lawlor “abused his role as an elected public representative”, and that he effectively “conducted a personal business” where he “corruptly sold his expertise, influence and experience” for his own personal gain.
Another finding against a Fianna Fáil man said former minister Padraig Flynn “wrongly and corruptly” took a payment of IRL£50,000 from developer Tom Gilmartin in 1989 and used the money for his personal benefit.
Former Fianna Fáil TD GV Wright also received a IR£5,000 “corrupt” payment from Christopher Jones, according to the final report.
It also made findings of corruption against 11 councillors.
And, what happened them then?
Bertie Ahern had to resign from Fianna Fáil. Although he wasn’t found to be corrupt, the ‘truthful’ remark was enough to be the final nail in the coffin. Other colleagues also joined him in the (forced) resignations. They included Pádraig Flynn, GV Wright, Don Lydon, Finbarr Hanrahan and John Hannon.
Ray Burke was sentenced to six months in jail in 2004 for failing to make a proper tax return.
Liam Lawlor served three different spells in prison for failing to co-operate with the processes of the Tribunal.
The Revenue Commissioners chased down about €34 million of the money it was owed by various parties to the Tribunal.
So, why is it back in the news?
It is good news for some of those who had bad days in over the past 15 years because of Flood, Mahon and Co.
Last summer, during a case taken by Joseph Murphy Structural Engineers against the Tribunal, the judges took issue with how it handled the evidence given by star witness James Gogarty.
Once the Supreme Court had made its ruling on what it described as withholding evidence wrongly, it was clear there would be problems for at least some of the findings of the 14-year-old inquiry.
Advertisement
And just a few months later, in came George Redmond.
The ex-planning official won his legal battle last month to have all conclusions and adverse findings against him removed. This came as a direct result of the Supreme Court ruling on Gogarty’s evidence.
In the High Court, the Tribunal said it would remove the findings and pay his legal costs.
That move also meant the findings of corruption against businessmen Michael Bailey and Joseph Murphy Jnr were also quashed for the same reasons. Findings that they hindered and obstructed the trial have also been rescinded.
What have we heard about Ray Burke then?
He’s the man in the main picture of this article and was a former minister (he looked after numerous portfolios, including justice) in the 1980s and 1990s.
Following Redmond’s successful High Court action, and the Joseph Murphy Structural Engineers case the tribunal has written to a number of affected parties, including the former minister Burke, as well as businessmen Oliver Barry andJames Stafford.
They have been told that the findings of hindering and obstructing the work of the Tribunal will be withdrawn. They will now be able to retrieve his legal costs, which run into millions of euro.
The Tribunal also apologised to Burke for the finding. There have been inconsistent reports on whether all others who were accused of the same charge in the second and third interim reports received the same written apology.
Why were these findings removed?
In short: James Gogarty.
The Supreme Court found that important material relevant to his credibility was wrongly withheld. One judge described the evidence as “potentially explosive”.
According to an Irish Times’ front page story on Thursday, that evidence included allegations by Gogarty against a politician and a law officer. Those allegations were deemed not credible and were redacted from the evidence before it was handed over to the legal teams of other witnesses.
The Tribunal put its hands up, accepting the Supreme Court judges take on this.
Who is James Gogarty again?
One of Ireland’s most famous whistleblowers, the former Garda and engineer is widely accepted as the man who uncovered the entire issue of corrupt planning. He responded to the initial public offer of a IR£10,000 reward for information leading to convictions in planning corruption by the former chairman of An Taisce Michael Smith and the barrister Colm Mac Eochaidh.
Appearing at the then Flood Tribunal, Gogarty gave perhaps the most crucial piece of evidence in saying that he had witnessed a bribe of IR£30,000 being paid to then Minister Ray Burke which he claimed was for the purpose of seeking Burke’s influence to rezone over 700 acres of land at several locations in north Dublin.
Gogarty’s criticism of his employers, whom he was in dispute with, several politicians and the planning process as a whole earned him widespread praise for his courage in exposing corruption in the planning process. He died in 2005.
What about Bertie?
An RTÉ PrimeTime programme on Thursday indicated that the finding that Bertie was not ‘truthful’ will not be impacted by these judgements.
However, lawyers for the Tribunal are now looking at all findings based on the Gogarty evidence.
Well, how much will all this end up costing the taxpayer?
It is not yet clear how much will need to be added to that to cover the new legal costs that have now arisen. Burke’s legal fees alone could reach up to €10 million.
However, in a statement earlier this month, Judge Mahon himself said that the €159 million estimate is still correct because Third Party costs will not increase from the €48.5 million budgeted for in May 2014.
“This estimate was based on the assumption that all third parties (including Mr. Redmond) received their full costs, following (where appropriate) an adjudication of those costs by the Taxing Master of the High Court.
“The recent Redmond case decision does not alter this estimate of € 48.5 million nor the estimate of € 159 million in relation to the total cost of the Tribunal since its inception.”
Judge Mahon also added: “The Tribunal’s estimates are based on actual costs paid, or likely to be paid, and not amounts claimed for costs.
It has been the experience of the Tribunal that in very many cases, third party claims for costs have been grossly exaggerated and bear little relevance to the costs actually paid or likely to be paid following negotiation and /or the Taxation process.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Washington street is one of the main thoroughfares through the city and its a bit run down in places. It’d be great to see an injection of life into it
I agree with Hurley on many of those points but in fairness she’s OTT too. I mean its only a portion of the entire street not a whole section of the city no matter what the history and admits the planners were admirable in their plans anyway. Its seems hard to get anything done these days when its badly needed. The ongoing saga of the old Beamish brewery is a complete farce at this stage too.
Generally student ghettos tend to be the worst kind of housing ghettos when it comes to antisocial behaviour, noise, late night partying, abandoning cars everywhere, putting furniture on the streets, not taking care of rubbish, et cetera. And that’s before we even think about so-called RAG week. Until we educate our youth about community living and values, who could blame anyone not wanting them anywhere near them? Parents really need to take more responsibility.
@Dr Richard DeWitt: what college are you hanging out near?! Went to college in Cork ten years ago, still live near UCC and I’ve never seen anything like that. There’s parties occasionally but they’re all gone out around 11. Rag week is a little messy but there’s no badness in it. You sound like a grumpy old fart. Maybe you should partake in rag week and enjoy yourself
Several women arrested at Mothers Against Genocide vigil for Gaza outside Leinster House
Updated
2 hrs ago
22.4k
26
vanished
Defence Forces called in to help with search for missing Kerry farmer Michael Gaine
3 mins ago
61
Dublin
Mother and son face losing home after change to tenants scheme
19 hrs ago
66.1k
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 161 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 110 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 143 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 113 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 39 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 35 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 134 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 61 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 88 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say