Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
‘Political death’: The EU Parliament fake jobs scam that has cost Le Pen her 2027 presidency bid
Vote of confidence in Ceann Comhairle Verona Murphy to take place tomorrow
Mother and son face losing home after change to tenants scheme
China
China confirms forced abortion case after uproar
The Chinese authorities have confirmed that a woman was forced to abort seven months into her pregnancy because she failed to pay a hefty fine for exceeding the country’s strict “one-child” population control policy.
CHINESE AUTHORITIES CONFIRMED today that a woman was forced to abort seven months into her pregnancy, several days after her plight came to light when images of her baby’s corpse were posted online.
Rights groups have blamed authorities in north China’s Shaanxi province for forcing Feng Jianmei to abort her pregnancy because she failed to pay a hefty fine for exceeding China’s strict “one-child” population control policy.
The Shaanxi provincial government said in a statement that a preliminary probe had confirmed the case was “basically true”, and the investigators have recommended action be taken against the perpetrators.
“This is a serious violation of the National Population and Family Planning Commission’s policies, jeopardises the population control work and has caused uneasiness in society,” the provincial government said on its website.
The government did not pinpoint exactly who the perpetrators were, but vowed to avoid a repeat of such a case, which it said was against regulations in effect since 2001 banning late-term abortions.
Chinese web users have reacted in anger to the abortion, with one comparing it to acts perpetrated by “Japanese devils and Nazis”, after photos online showed Feng lying on a hospital bed next to the blood-smeared body of her baby.
A relative told AFP on Wednesday that Feng and her husband had opposed the termination.
Advertisement
An official at the national family planning commission who declined to be named said earlier that the commission viewed the matter as “serious and important” and that the probe was being handled at the “top level”.
China has implemented its draconian family planning policy since the late 1970s in an effort to control a population that has grown to 1.3 billion people, the world’s largest.
Under the policy, urban families are generally allowed to have one child, while rural families can give birth to two children if the first is a girl. They have to pay a fine if they contravene the rules.
Rights groups say that as a result of the policy, thousands of women have been forced by authorities to terminate their pregnancies.
Blind activist Chen Guangcheng, who recently left China for the United States after fleeing house arrest, was once jailed after angering local officials for bringing to light hundreds of forced abortions.
Official statistics show that since the start of the policy, the number of abortions peaked in 1983, with a total of 14.37 million terminations that year.
The US said Monday it has expressed opposition to China’s one-child policy after activists reported that a five-month-pregnant woman faces an imminent forced abortion in a separate case.
“We make no secret that the United States strongly oppose all aspects of China’s coercive birth limitation policies, including forced abortion and sterilisation, and we always raise these issues with the Chinese government,” State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Thanks to The Journal, All Girls Allowed, Women’s Rights Without Frontiers and others for giving these cases media attention.
We need to keep the international pressure up — e-mail the Chinese embassy in Dublin chinaemb_ie@mfa.gov.cn or call them on 01 269 1707. All it takes is two minutes.
Let them know in no uncertain terms that forced abortion is completely abhorrent practice and must end!!
1. You didn’t mention the mother. You used her trauma to draw attention to your own “plight” and score political points. She obviously feels that her baby was a baby. You don’t. But you didn’t let this crucial divergence of opinion stop you from using her. How selfish can you get?
2. You didn’t mention the baby. Maybe I’m insane, but isn’t the person who got killed kinda a victim?
3. You didn’t mention the father who has been bereaved just like his wife. Isn’t that a zany thought? Having sympathy for a man? Lol!! Can you imagine!?? We all know fathers are as disposable as 7 month old foetuses, and must never be considered.
@Chuck its spelt fetus. that poor woman is the victim. my heart breaks for her and I hope she receives some compensation and a chance to emigrate – IF she wants to
I have every sympathy for the man. Even if he didn’t have to go through a physical trauma, their whole family (including the first child) has been through a lot. I guess the difference is unlike you, I (and most Journal readers apparently) feel horrible for every woman whose body is co-opted against her will.
Well done Teresa, you’re the first person to read this and think; “Compo!”
Nick, if you’re so full of sympathy then why are you co-opting the horrible thing that was done to her? You have no sympathy for her at all, you directed it all at yourself. As I outlined, your oversights betray you
Yawn. Nope, pro choice but think there’s a decent argument for it being a person. But hey, argue with your strawman, it’s a hell of a lot more accommodating.
A great bunch of lads. And people have no problem ‘doing business’ with that place. It’s sickening how their many human rights abuses are seemingly overlooked by the Western world.. The only difference between China and North Korea is that North Korea aren’t likely to invest vast amounts of money in our interests any time soon. Cognitive dissonance is a funny old thing.
The sheer disregard for human life, for basic human rights in China is truly stunning. It’s basically a corporatist fascist state. What always gets me, is when people on the left defend it, and say America is worse. I have never seen the sheer materialism and robber baron capitalism that defines Chinese society.
China is hell for the poor, hell for the rural peasant. Hell for workers, who have absolutely no rights, who are horrifically abused and used.
America may have massive problems but it is a 100 times better to be poor in America than in China.
Who on the left defends China? No one. But that doesn’t suit your argument because people like to imply that Communist China (note the capital C) is a socialist/communist state when it in fact is nothing of the sort. Socialism is about equality and democracy, nothing like that exists in China or ever has.
Oh my god couldn’t read that story, abort at 7 months? why not wait till the child was born and slit its throat not much difference. Lots of babies are delivered at 7 months and go on to lead lives as full as the rest of us. How can this be allowed to happen? Why isnt every government in the world shouting about this. Going on about that scruff mick wallaces tax, they cant/wont fire him from the dail. This is something that they could actually do to make a difference but hey they cant be bothered cause China are our friends. Its all about the money
Wow, the issue is people not being able to control their own bodies, not late term abortions! Children are being used as human shields, physically and sexually abused and tortured in Syria, get some perspective about what governments should be shouting about. Late term abortions, anywhere, are a secondary worry.
I do not agree with abortion as a birth control method and certainly not forced abortion, so what I want to mention is not that relevant to this story. I find it strange that world population growth isn’t discussed (and tackled) more. In my 44yrs on this planet the world population has doubled to over 7billion. The world does not have inexhaustable resources and at some stage human population growth will have to be slowed or contained.
It would be much more preferable to tackle this major issue in a controled and logical way, than to allow it to spiral out of control. I don’t have the answer but it doesn’t seem as if anyone is looking for it.
Everyone knows world population as it continuous to grow is not sustainable but yet its ignored and nobody is willing to discuss it and come up with solution,
OK the subject its somewhat off-topic for this story but it needs to be addressed sooner rather then later.
While I don’t agree with many of the actions China takes they atleast are trying to deal with the issue of massive population growth and it has reduced their population making sure that they can actually feed and house people in the country without the country going bankrupt and people starving to death.
While it’s true that every time the population doubles, the time it has taken to double is roughly halved, you also have to look at where it’s happening. In the West we had our population explosions around times of industrial and agricultural development and urbanisation, after which it flattens out. No reason to believe the same won’t happen after the developing world goes through a similar process.
New laws introduced in some US states now insist upon doctors showing women who want abortions pictures of their baby’s fetus. They’re not too far off.
Well, it’s not as extreme in America, but it’s just as much guilty of violating people’s human rights over there. There’s the “state sanctioned rape” (women who want abortions have to submit to vaginal probing – it’s pretty horrible) in Virginia right now – and all the other crazy ways they’re trying too restrict abortion access.
Then there’s what Martin’s talking about – a little less terrifying and awful but still pretty disgraceful.
And I dunno, but personally I’m not in favour of doing business with a country in which some states have the death penalty…
Ah, come on, how is that “nearly as bad”? Objectionable, maybe. Insenstive and probably futile. But as bad as this poor woman had to go through and will continue to go through for the rest of her life?
That is a sad story. However a simpler one child law could be world wide in 100 of years time. Population is increasing at a fast rate and there only so much food we can produce. So its going to be interesting for our yet to be born grandchildren how they will sort it out .
Population is pretty much only increasing in countries which have either large emigrant populations (like America, whose population would be falling otherwise) or countries which have poor educational standards or fewer rights for women as well as very little access to contraceptives or access to healthcare in general. So I’d imagine first world countries would bring in stricter immigration laws before bringing in a one child policy. Hopefully the countries with population problems will find a way to implement the reasonably obvious solution at some point and we can get our population under control.
What a bunch of animals! I’d be pro choice but at 7 months that unborn child was essentially a nearly formed person, premature babies are born and survive at that age. Is that business hub in Athlone still going ahead? …I’m not sure we really want it.
A woman should have the right to control all of her reproductive choices, and that includes the choice to continue a pregnancy a term if she wishes – without coercion to do otherwise.
How many continued pregnancies in the west are “forced” whether pressure from the family, father or worse? Remember the Irish Times article mentioned that a lot of women who wish to have terminations for medical reasons encounter a lot of family pressure not to. It doesn’t make it right simply because you agree with it.
Far less than the number of forced pregnancies due to pressure from family, male partners, and restrictive legal situations.
Eitherway, it’s still an abuse of women’s bodies. And while I take your point that being against forced abortion is something that pro and anti choice people can agree on, it doesn’t take away from the fact that anti-choice people are quite happy to allow the abuse of women’s bodies through the continuation of a ban on or restriction of abortion rights.
Actually it’s not..
The vast majority of abortions (we’re talking up between 80-90%) are induced chemically within the first 9-12 weeks. At which point the body could just as easily spontaneously abort or miscarry. It is induced miscarriage.
Later on its a surgical procedure in some cases, but you chose to pick on one tiny spotlight fallacy and tout it as though it applies in all cases. You chose the absolute worst case scenario and bandied it about as the norm. This is complete and utter logical fallacy.
1. Misleading vividness – dramatising to lend weight to an otherwise weak argument.
2. Fallacy of composition – the mistaken assumption that what may be true of some parts, is also true of the whole.
3. Spotlight fallacy, the mistaken notion that a certain aspect of a group or action that gets the most press is indicative of the whole group or process.
It would be the pro life campaign that would have shone this spotlight to begin with, it’s akin to tabloid journalism.. In fairness, logical fallacies are an excellent manipulation tool when used against those with no grounding in logic..
If you don’t believe me, check out the definitions of the 3 logical fallacies I have explained to you above and then come back and tell me your comment was warranted..
IT IS COMPLETELY A SHAME TO HEAR THIS STORY AS A CHINESE. I am the fifth child of my family and was born just after the child control policy was carried out. In order to keep me my mother almost quit her job and hide in a complete rural area until i was born there with a neighbor’s help. So to some extent i am very lucky. But when my mom took me back to the city i lived in the government took all the expensive stuff from my family like the only Color TV in the whole community in 1984.Besides my father was fired by the school he worked in b4 so he had to run his own small business afterwards :( So my mom always teasing me saying like im a very expensive child…:( really a hard time at the beginning.
Im not gonna say whether its good or bad for the birth control policy cos at least it stopped famine there that time and make lots of family lead relatively a decent life. but i think it should be the right time to allow the Chinese family for the second child cos the population almost stops growing lately. And for those millions of families who lost their only child in a late age like 50s, their family almost become a totally misery.
As for the fine it varies a lot that depends on your income and profession. if you work for the government , breaking this policy means losing your job. if you are running your own business they will fine you a large portion of you whole family wealth. From thousands of euros for the peasants to hundreds of thousands of euros for the rich.
Hi Wang. Really good to hear things from your personal perspective/experience. Appalling report. I read somewhere that the one child policy had been relaxed somewhat, but that if a family did have a second child or more, the family were totally alone regarding the health care, education etc of that child. There would be absolutely no state support available for that child. Was this information incorrect? I’m just curious. Your story and the plight of Chinese families, puts the Irish sorry mess more in perspective.
How much money was the fine? I think it could have been raised so these patents could keep their baby. All the money that’s wasted on shit in this world. Surely this fine is a drop in the ocean.
This inhumane treatment is from the Chinese who with the Russians back Assads reign of terror in Syria, and some clown here wants to promote a chinese commercial hub here in ireland , wake up people , these people have no value on human life they make george orwells book look like a disney movie,never to be trusted and avoid at all costs
This is an awful story, but the generalisation that a whole continent of people is somehow evil is totally hypocritcal. I wonder do the chinese read our stories on symphysiotomy, magdelene laundries and institutional child abuse. We are not so rosy ourselves over here.
Where did Nick say that? I don’t see anything suggesting that..
Mind you, you seem to be taking to speak on other posters behalves here..
Perhaps we should turn the tables..
“How dare Ciara and Nick have their own minds and wish for autonomy over their own bodies, don’t these girls know their place!?”
Now, unless that is actually how you feel, which I am not actually suggesting as I do not know you outside of your contributions here, I would expect you to be a bit offended by the insinuation that you wish to oppress women.
That’s the thing about making straw man arguments and trying to put words in other peoples mouths.. The person who comes out looking worse is actually you.
Shanti,best not responding to chuck. He seems to be in a world of his own,taking your words and twisting them then telling you you said something which you didn’t. Classic example is nicks so called opinion above. Ignore and move on
Well if Chuck expects to be taken seriously then he’ll need to work on his debating skills.. At least now he has no excuse. He has been shown the flaws in his argument, let’s see how he chooses to integrate that.. His response will either make him look like he was perhaps simply ignorant to these aspects of logic or that he’s a completely closed mind incapable of learning from mistakes..
Or he might just shut the f@#$ up :)
Now that’s sick to be honest if the want a one only child agenda then have females sterilized don’t abort a baby at 7 months unless there was a valid medical reason to do so!!!!!
This is such a disgrace, made all the worse by the fact that the international community is not rising up in opposition to the One Child Policy. We need to support the women and families targeted by this terrible practice and make it clear to China that the international community will not tolerate such abuses of human rights.
The one child family is there for good reason and you should easily see that. Not going to say anything about the 7 month abortion because I’m trying my best not to think of it.
I’m afraid I don’t “easily” see why the One Child Policy was ever deemed a good idea. It has resulted in a society where neighbours are encouraged to spy on each other, report alleged “breaches” of the policy to the government, and engendered a climate of fear and terror throughout China. This case is just one of the many that take place on a regular basis in China. I’m only surprised that the Chinese government has actually admitted it.
As for the fact that you would prefer not think about the 7 month forced abortion, well, I don’t blame you. I’d rather not think about it myself but seeing as it is taking place all the time in China – and in many cases at 9 months – I think we all have a responsibility to support the campaign against the One Child Policy.
I disagree absolutely that it is there “for good reason”. It exists to control and subdue the Chinese people, especially it’s women, and for no other reason.
Cora and I disagree on a lot, but actually lamp, all evidence shows that the best way to reduce population is to give women education and make birth control widely available. A more educated workforce delays childbearing and has fewer children. Thus why Western Europe has barely replacement level population. The same aims could be achieved with FAR less violation of human rights.
I think the One Child Policy, and its inherent abuses against human rights throughout China, is something that can unite people regardless of whether they consider themselves to be “prolife” or “prochoice” on the substantive issue of abortion. No-one should be forced to have an abortion. It is inhumane in the extreme.
I would encourage everyone who was interested enough to read or comment on this story to visit Reggie Littlejohn’s website at http://www.womensrightswithoutfrontiers.org where you can sign a petition to have this Policy ended.
Reggie has done fantastic work in highlighting the tragedies of the One Child Policy to the rest of the world. She has also been a staunch supporter of Chen Guangcheng, the blind Chinese activist who was imprisoned by the Chinese government for opposing the Policy, and recently escaped to the USA where he now writes a column for the New York Times.
Who knows how many other stories like this one have gone unheard of, covered up by China’s media blackout?
It is up to those of us who are lucky enough to are not personally affected by these horror stories, to campaign on behalf of those Chinese families who cannot defend themselves.
This State sponsored murder must be condemned by all States at a General Session of the United Nations. There is no difference whatever between Nazi murder of minorities within the concentration camps and this barbaric and disgusting practice. Great Chinese philosophers would shudder at suc barbaric behaviour. All participants are guilty of infanticide under order or not.
What a sad story, and we (the international community) expect the Chinese to join a sanction on Syria ? Why would a country that is willing to “legally” kill over 14 million of its own innocent children be even remotely interested in protecting a few hundred/thousand in Syria ? In doing so they would also have to sanction themselves!! It scares me to think that these are the people who help dictate international law – the system is hypocritical !
Where was my reply…gosh
To Sascha,
yea that will happen if they didnt pay for their second child because they cudnt get their child registered..which means no public resources for this kid , so the parents have to pay for a lot more money for their kid schooling, health care, etc. So most of the parents choose to pay for their second kid there.
And yes it has been relaxed a bit. For instance if both of the couple are the only child from each family and then they can have two children in total if they want. For minority ethics in China, they can have as many children as they can in the countryside or two children in the city all the time , not fair tho.
Actually, forced abortion is also banned in China , so in big cities this case rarely happens.But in the countryside, still lots of the force abortion going on there because the leaders there are idiots like.It’s totally a criminal!!!
This is murder of an innocent baby, just the same as abortion is in any other part of the world forced or not. Strange how few comments there are condemning this! Pro choice silent on this.
‘Political death’: The EU Parliament fake jobs scam that has cost Le Pen her 2027 presidency bid
3 hrs ago
14.4k
85
Dáil Éireann
Vote of confidence in Ceann Comhairle Verona Murphy to take place tomorrow
18 mins ago
833
4
Dublin
Mother and son face losing home after change to tenants scheme
21 hrs ago
69.0k
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 161 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 110 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 143 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 113 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 39 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 35 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 134 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 61 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 88 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say