Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
FactCheck
FactCheck: The truth and the lies from last night's Leaders' Debate
TheJournal.ie’s GE16 FactCheck went into overdrive last night, testing the level of truth and lies in last night’s battle.
6.50am, 12 Feb 2016
44.8k
144
AS PART OF our GE16 FactCheck series, we’re testing the truth of claims made by candidates and parties on the campaign trail.
If you hear something that doesn’t sound quite right, or see a claim that looks great, but you want to confirm it, email factcheck@thejournal.ie.
Last night was the first time we had all four leaders of the main parties in the same room, and predictably, there was a raft of claims, counter-claims and accusations.
We’ve rated an extensive selection of them, and separated out the truth, lies, and damn lies.
RollingNews.ie
RollingNews.ie
ECONOMY & MIGRATION
CLAIM: Unemployment is down to 8.6% – Joan Burton Verdict: TRUE. The CSO’s seasonally adjusted monthly unemployment rate was 8.6% in January 2016. This is the lowest it has been since December 2008.
CLAIM: Enda Kenny said he wants Ireland’s personal tax rates to be the same as the United States – Micheál Martin. Verdict: Half-true, but relies on one interpretation of a statement.
What was said:
MM: Enda, what did you say before Christmas? You said you wanted Ireland’s personal tax rates to be the same as the United States.” EK: Where did I say that?
Martin then read the following quote, which Kenny offered to reporters on 20 December:
One of the things we have to reach out to is to make personal tax rates competitive with Britain, and with Australia, and with Canada, and with the US.
It might be fair to assume this would entail bringing our rates closer to those of the four countries, but Martin’s interpretation of it as meaning Kenny wants to make our personal tax rates the same as just one of those countries, is merely one possible interpretation.
CLAIM: Youth emigration was 250,000 under Fianna Fáil – Enda Kenny Verdict: Partly TRUE, but it depends on which Fianna Fáil term he meant, and leaves out the fact that Fianna Fáil oversaw significant net inward migration.
What was said:
Referring to Micheál Martin, Kenny stated: “This man’s party drove 250,000 young people out of the country.”
The facts:
CSO.ie
CSO.ie
According to the CSO, from 1997-2010 (Fianna Fáil’s two terms), 276,800 people aged 15-24 emigrated. Kenny’s claim is TRUE if it refers to this period of time.
From 2007-2010 (their last term), the figure was 90,600. Kenny’s claim is FALSE if it refers to this period of time.
However, between 1997 and 2010, 75,800 more young people came to Ireland than left. The same figure for 2007-2010 was 75,300. So while it’s true Fianna Fáil oversaw significant youth emigration, there was significant net inward migration.
By contrast, 169,000 people aged 15-24 left Ireland between 2011 and 2015. Some 72,700 arrived, meaning the Fine Gael/Labour government has overseen net outward migration to the tune of 96,300.
HEALTH
Róisín Shortall RollingNews.ie
RollingNews.ie
Claim: Labour broke pledges to get rid of the HSE, bring in Universal Health Insurance, free prescriptions, protect child benefit and disability allowance – Gerry Adams Verdict: 4.5/5 TRUE
HSE: False. Labour explicitly said they would not get rid of the HSE, but rather restructure it. From their 2011 manifesto:
Labour’s plan does not abolish the HSE outright. Instead, Labour’s plan transforms what we have already, so that the functions of the HSE are split between purchasing hospital care on the one hand, and a continuation of its management of mental health, community care and social care on the other.
Universal Health Insurance: TRUE. In an October 2010 commitment, the party did indeed promise universal health insurance. They repeated the pledge in their 2011 manifesto:
Labour in government will introduce Universal Health Insurance.
Prescription charges: TRUE. Labour promised to reverse Fianna Fáil’s introduction of prescription charges for those on medical cards. That did not come to pass.
Medical card holders qualified for free drugs until this Government introduced a 50 cent per item prescription charge in 2010. Labour in Government will remove this charge.
Child benefit: TRUE. In 2011, Labour promised to protect child benefit rates. However, in that year’s budget, payment rates were standardised, and in the 2013 Budget, child benefit was cut by €10.
Joan Burton retorted tonight that child benefit had been increased in the last two Budgets. That is also true.
Disability Allowance: Half-true. This was cut in the government’s first Budget in 2011, but famously reversed after a huge public outcry.
RollingNews.ie
RollingNews.ie
CLAIM: The HSE Director said 2016 will be the worst year in a decade for the health service – Micheál Martin Verdict: TRUE
What was said:
Martin stated during tonight’s debate:
The HSE Director has said that 2016 will be the worst year in a decade for the health service, and that you under-provided it by €150 million.
Enda Kenny interjected to say “Not so,” and Joan Burton claimed “That is not true.”
It is, however, true.
The facts
According to documents released under FOI to the Irish Examiner, and reported on 6 February, HSE Director Tony O’Brien wrote to the Secretary General of the Department of Health James Breslin on 17 November 2015, saying that rising public expectations…
…will make 2016 the most difficult year the health service has faced over the last 10 years.
This was in light of what O’Brien regarded as a €150 million shortfall in the HSE’s allocation in Budget 2016.
CLAIM: Micheál Martin removed free GP care for the over-70s – Colette Fitzpatrick Verdict: FALSE. The only mistake of the night from either chair of the debate.
What was said:
CF: You weren’t there recently when Fianna Fáil unveiled its own health policy. Were you afraid of facing tricky questions about your own record in the Department of Health? MM: I beg your pardon…Go back on my performance in health… CF: You took away free GP care for the over-70s. MM: I didn’t, actually. I was the minister who brought in free medical cards for the over-70s. I brought in that move… CF: And you took it away.
Martin has this one right. He was Minister for Health in 2002, when the government introduced an automatic entitlement to free GP care for anyone over the age of 70.
The scheme was ended in 2008, by which time Mary Harney had taken over as minister.
CLAIM: Labour sacked Róisín Shortall – Micheál Martin Verdict: FALSE – no evidence to support this claim.
What was said:
After Joan Burton mentioned primary care centres, the Fianna Fáil leader interjected:
You guys sacked Róisín Shortall because of her commitment to primary care centres in disadvantaged areas. You left her hang out to dry.
Burton responded: “Róisín Shortall left the Labour party.”
We’re open to correction on this one, if Martin or Fianna Fáil can offer proof, but there is no evidence available to support the claim that Shortall was fired from her position as Junior Minister for primary health care.
She resigned on 26 September 2012, after a long-running conflict with then Health Minister James Reilly over the provision and location of primary care centres around the country. She resigned the Labour whip the same day.
CLAIM: There are more GPs with HSE contracts than ever before – Enda Kenny Verdict: Almost entirely TRUE.
What was said:
We have more GPs with contracts with the HSE than ever before, and more GPs in the country.
According to the HSE’s yearly statistical analysis of the Primary Care Reimbursement Scheme, there were 2,870 GPs with contracts in 2014, the most recent year for which data is available.
While this is not the highest number ever (2,888 in 2013), there has been a steady increase in numbers since 2005, when 2,257 were signed up.
There’s no official register of GPs in Ireland, beyond those contracted with the PCRS, so we can only presume Kenny’s claim of “more GPs in the country” was just a reiteration of the first part of his claim.
CRIME & GARDA RESOURCES
Niall Carson / PA
Niall Carson / PA / PA
CLAIM: More than 1,100 Gardaí have been recruited since Templemore reopened in 2014 – Joan Burton Verdict: FALSE, but she may have misspoken.
What was said:
So far, since we reopened [Templemore] towards the end of 2014, we now have over 1,100 new Gardaí and currently we have 500 additional Gardaí in training…
The facts
In answer to a parliamentary question earlier this month, Justice Minister Frances Fitzgerald stated that, since the re-opening of Templemore Garda training college in 2014, 550 new Garda trainees had been recruited
She added that 296 of those 550 recruits were now stationed throughout the country.
Last year’s budget provided for the additional recruitment of 600 trainees by the end of 2016, but that recruitment has not actually taken place.
Advertisement
So the Labour leader’s claim that “we now have over 1,100 new Gardaí” really ought to be “We now have 296 new Gardaí, 254 recruits in training, and an additional 600 expected to enter training by the beginning of 2017.”
The second part of the claim – “we have 500 additional Gardaí in training” – is therefore also false.
CLAIM: The last two governments got rid of 3,500 Garda positions – Gerry Adams Verdict: Half-true – most departures were retirements, and ignores parallel recruitment of new Gardaí.
What was said: “This government and the previous one got rid of 3,500 Garda positions.”
The facts:
Oireachtas.ie
Oireachtas.ie
The governments didn’t “get rid” of the positions, but from 2007-2015, there were a total of 3,577 departures from An Garda Síochána, most of which came from voluntary retirement.
So Adams is correct in stating the combined number of Gardaí who left the force during the tenures of the last Fianna Fáil-led government, and the outgoing Fine Gael/Labour one.
However, this obviously doesn’t take into account recruitment.
During Fianna Fáil’s time in government from 1997 to 2011, there was a net gain of 2,926 in Garda strength. During the tenure of Fine Gael and Labour since 2011, there has been a net loss of 1,078.
CLAIM: The government has closed 140 Garda stations – Gerry Adams Verdict: Almost entirely TRUE. The actual number is 139.
What was said: “They closed 140 Garda stations.”
The facts:
39 Garda stations were closed in 2012, and 100 closed in 2013. For a list of 37 of the 39 closed in 2012, click here. For a list of the 100 stations closed in 2013, click here.
RollingNews.ie
RollingNews.ie
CLAIM: Gerry Adams said juries could go into witness protection – Joan Burton Verdict: FALSE, but Adams wasn’t entirely clear on what he was proposing.
What was said:
While discussing the Special Criminal Court last night, the Tánaiste stated:
I don’t know what planet Gerry is living in on this. He suggested that juries could actually go into a witness protection programme.
Adams rejected the claim, saying “This is fairytales by Joan Burton.”
The facts:
A disclaimer: We weren’t present at Sunday’s press conference, where Adams made the disputed statements, and haven’t heard a full, unedited recording of it.
However, an excerpted Irish Independent transcript does not show Adams ever explicitly calling for witness protection for juries, and does show him demurring when that specific proposition was put to him.
Here’s a selection from the exchange last Sunday.
Q: How exactly would you protect witnesses and juries? GA: In Britain, across Europe and in the US they have witness protection programmes and they deal with criminality and they bring those that are accused and they are subject to due process. Q: So would you put juries into a sort of witness protection programme? GA: There are measures which can be used to deal with all of that … Q: You said you’d send jurors into witness protection? GA: I said other administrations deal with this issue and deal with criminality of this kind without resource to Special Criminal Courts.
HOUSING & HOMELESSNESS
RollingNews.ie
RollingNews.ie
CLAIM: Only 28 local authority houses were built last year, and there are 100,000 people on the housing waiting list – Gerry Adams. Verdict: Mostly TRUE
What was said:
There were 28 local authority houses built last year. 100,000 people on the housing list…
The facts:
28 is the number built in the first nine months of the year. We don’t yet have the final figure for 2015.
On the 100,000 figure: It’s not clear what point in time Adams was referring to, but the most recent comprehensive tally, by RTE Prime Time, showed a total of 139,359 people on housing waiting lists, at the end of January.
CLAIM: The government made 2,500 vacant houses available for social housing last year – Joan Burton Verdict: TRUE, but actually slightly understates the figure.
What was said:
…People often see, in cities in towns and Ireland, boarded-up local authority properties and apartments and houses. In 2015, we opened up 2,500 of those, and they’re now occupied by families and individuals.
The facts:
The actual number of vacant properties provided for social housing last year was 2,696.
However, the Tánaiste’s claim that all those houses are now occupied does not have a verifiable factual basis. For more details, check out this article.
CLAIM: The government is investing €3.8 billion in social housing – Joan Burton Verdict: TRUE
What was said:
This government and the Labour party have put together the largest housing investment package that this country has ever seen – €3.8 billion.
The facts:
As part of its Social Housing Strategy, published in November 2014, the government set out to build, acquire, or lease 35,573 social housing units between 2015 and 2020.
The estimated cost would be €3.8 billion, the equivalent of €633 million per year.
RollingNews.ie
RollingNews.ie
CLAIM: Fianna Fáil ended the tradition of local authority social housing – Joan Burton Verdict: Very, very FALSE.
What was said:
The biggest housing crisis has its roots in the decision by Fianna Fáil, by accident or design, I’m not sure which, to actually end the tradition of local authorities building houses. And basically that died, and now we have to recreate that.
Martin called the claim “completely untrue” and “incredible.”
MM: Between 2007 and 2010, the Fianna Fáil-led government built 14,000 social houses – actual social houses. In the last five years, Fine Gael and Labour built just over 1,000. It’s incredible for you to tell an untruth there, that said we ended social housing. JB: You did end social housing. MM: We didn’t. We built 14,000.
The facts:
Dept of Environment
Dept of Environment
Martin actually understates the number of social housing units built by both governments, by restricting his statement to only local authority housing, but the thrust of what he said is right.
From 2007-2010, 14,035 local authority and 6,345 voluntary and co-operative houses were built. A total of 20,380.
From 2011 until September 2015, 1,328 local authority and 2,184 voluntary + co-operative houses were built. A total of 3,512.
Social housing construction was slowing by the end of the last Fianna Fáil-led government, but still exceeded the current government’s construction rate, by a multiple of almost six.
The number of local authority houses built in their last year in power, 2010, was 1,328.
By coincidence, that’s the exact same number of local authority houses built during Fine Gael and Labour’s entire term in office, from 2011-2015.
So the Labour leader’s claim that social housing construction died under Fianna Fáil, and that the current government were “recreating it” is massively wide of the mark.
Send your FactCheck requests to factcheck@thejournal.ie
Sign Up
FactCheck
The Journal's monthly FactCheck newsletter keeps you in the loop about what misinformation trends Ireland is experiencing - and how we're fighting back. Sign up here
@Ollie Fitzpatrick: The vast number of us don’t end up in prison so why does it need to change for the 1%(or so) that do end up there?…..It’s always someone or something else’s fault in this country.
@John Terry: I know what you are saying, John, but personally, I feel that the education system does nothing for students who have skills in other walks of life. What good is in teaching a child Shakespeare, or languages, or metal work, etc, if he or she will never use them again.
If a student excels at a particular subject or activity, let them concentrate on that subject. It will make school more exciting for them and help them on their chosen path in life at an earlier stage!
@Ollie Fitzpatrick: I understand your point but I think the system is quite broad as to give everyone a ‘standard’ of education and to give everyone an opportunity to see all subjects and then determine what they want to do.I knew from an early stage that I wanted to work with my hands ….. but lots don’t have their minds made up at 17/18.
@Ollie Fitzpatrick: that’s nonsense in fairness, Ollie. The education system here is excellent, streets ahead of most countries. You’ll find that people who are in and out of prison usually left education early like their parents and siblings and peer group. There is little to no social incentive for them to stay in formal education. There is access to apprenticeships for students who might not be academically inclined but good with their hands etc. But the vast majority of these people have no interest in that either. I’m not saying I have the answer, I don’t, but people need to stop blaming the world for their bad choices.
@John Terry: I do agree with you John that everyone needs a standard of education to get through life , but my vision would to have say the first year as an assessment year and after that have a divergent system where pupils show an adeptness in a particular subject that their education would revolve around that subject. Say for instance a child is a skillfully football then their
@Ollie Fitzpatrick: sent before finished sorry…..
If a child is skilled at football then their education would revolve around that with less emphasis on core subjects. This would take time to implement but I think it would be a win win situation for both pupil and society in general!
@Ollie Fitzpatrick: I get where you’re coming from but it’s so multi layered. Poverty, social background, family and peer pressure-or lack of it-come into play too. I get as angry as anyone when it comes to some of the anti-social behaviour and while I get that individual choice still exists, most of us are irrevocably moulded by our surroundings and social background. I think there’s logic in getting kids to focus earlier on the things they are passionate about or will find useful but we also need to aim for a well rounded educated population as much as possible. Deciphering the current media and propaganda environment on its own is so important. The comments around here tell us this every day. Critical thinking is becoming an existential issue now with so many dire threats to deal with.
@Gearoid MacEachaidh: I don’t feel that it’s a nonsense Gearoid otherwise I wouldn’t have said it! I know many who have come from respectable good living families and ended up in trouble. Yes sometimes it’s hereditary but it can be weeded out if got in time. Access to apprenticeships are not as available as you may say. The old system whereby apprenticeships started when you were at inter cert age was good. Children are there to be led. Let’s lead them on the right path!!
@Ollie Fitzpatrick: apologies, calling it nonsense was a bit strong. But all kids have access to the same education service and only a tiny minority end up in prison. There are some people in prison from good families with a good upbringing and decent but from my experience they are in a very small minority. They tend to be in prison for one off offences, sometimes more serious offences in fairness but they don’t tend to be in and out of prison. It’s usually a once off unless drugs are involved. Whereas the vast majority of people in the system here are repeat offenders on short sentences. They tend to have a few things in common. Not finishing education is the big one. I don’t really know what the education system could do differently to prevent this. I think it’s more a sociatal problem
@Gearoid MacEachaidh: is the problem not that they don’t finish their education but that our society is structured to allo people to lie in bed in the mornings, to chose not to work? If everybody who gets a state benefit had to get up five mornings a week and do something to earn that payment, it might cut down on the problem.
@John Mulligan: I think that issue is a bit more grey too. There are a section of society that are completely unemployable. You know who they are, the yokes looting shops in November spring to mind. If I owned a business I wouldn’t hire them. So society has a choice. Stop all welfare assistance, which would affect any kids they have and lead to increased crime so they can make ends meet. Or pay them 232 per week. There are very few 1st world countries that don’t do it this way. People who don’t work can be “activated” after 12 months and have their welfare reduced if they don’t make an effort to find work. But there is a percentage who will never be in paye employment.
@No Label: non payment of TV licence usually means a visit to Mountjoy or Cloverhill for people in the greater Dublin area. You get processed into the system and in the vast majority of cases released that evening. It’s rare for them to be kept more than 1 night.
@No Label: Simon Coveney favours criminalizing ordinary citizens who conscionably object paying their hard earned money to an organization that has lied & covered up fraudulent governance, Coveney wants them all to be given criminal convictions, but a different rule of law to apply to those at the top in RTE, including his brother.
@James Carolan: I know you are being facetious but it should be encouraged ++ in prison. Look at all the research, it shows without education in prison nothing changes and many turn into a revolving door situation, in and out all their lives. They have a window in a young lads life to turn that around, it should be taken with both hands.
The Kerry poet Brendan Kennelly visited Mountjoy Prison to give informal classes in literary appreciation and poetry writing. Funds were found to publish a selection of poems by young prisoners. I once met the late Mr. Kennelly in a Dublin pub in Suffolk Street in the late 1970s and he spent fifteen minutes telling me about his efforts. Maybe classes/workshops of this kind should be encouraged by the Department of Justice?
To all the people claiming that prison is too soft, a holiday camp, a 4star hotel, I’d love to see you spend a few days in an actual prison amongst the general population. I really would. See you crying and wetting yourselves!
@Soundy Sound: been there done it (in cells in the CCJ) never made it to the Dóchas because I was innocent obviously of my domestic abusive step dad… the girls/ women if you want to call them that who I had the ‘privilege’ to meet in the cells had their hair extensions, tan, nails done etc. Give me a break.
US says deal reached to 'eliminate use of force' by Russia and Ukraine in the Black Sea
Updated
1 hr ago
3.2k
dail chaos
Confidence question looms over Ceann Comhairle but government says Murphy faced down intimidation
Christina Finn
51 mins ago
3.1k
40
trump administration
White House confirms Defence Secretary accidentally texted journalist US plans to strike Yemen
Updated
21 hrs ago
80.3k
151
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 160 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 110 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 142 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 112 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 38 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 34 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 133 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 59 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 88 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say