Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
YESTERDAY, THE DAILY Edge told you how to get the ultimate revenge on your friends, enemies and frenemies — send them glitter.
Today, we found the guy behind the evil and wicked deed. But Mathew Carpenter was too busy to take a call from TheJournal.ie. In fact, he said:
“I’m drowning in glitter – send help. Happy to answer any questions you have via email.”
So, we came up with 10 of our most pressing questions he could answer in writing. First, in case you haven’t heard about what he does, here’s an overview.
That’s pretty much it. ShipYourEnemiesGlitter.com is an Australian website that will send an envelope full of glitter to the people you hate (or the people you want to prank), for $9.99AUD. They explain:
Pay us money, provide an address anywhere in the world and we’ll send them so much glitter in an envelope that they’ll be finding that sh*t everywhere for weeks.
Since launching yesterday, there have been hundreds of articles written about the scheme, making this the busiest day of Carpenter’s young life. Does he have regrets? Read on…
1. Where the f*** did this genius idea come from?
I’ve received Christmas and birthday cards over the years from family and friends who put glitter in the cards. I hated it and wanted the rest of the world to feel my pain so that’s how the website was born.
2. Are you actually, really, truly sending glitter to people?
Yep!
3. How many orders have you taken this week?
The site has been live for just over 24 hours and thousands of people have purchased.
4 Why can’t I buy anything on your site right now, then?
Packing and shipping glitter takes a long time when we receive thousands of orders – I’ve had to temporarily halt orders.
5. Do you have a “real” job? What is it?
I’m the internet marketing industry. [Editor: We think he meant he's "in" the internet marketing industry but, heh, he might just be that confident.]
6. Is this your first glitter-venture?
My first – and my last hopefully.
7. Tell me more about yourself. (Not in a dating app way. Just your age, education, where do you live etc. Actually, that is kind of in a dating app way.)
I’m a 22-year-old Aussie dude that has too much free time apparently because now my plans for the next few weeks will consist of sending stupid fucking glitter to terrible people.
8. Are there other people involved in this operation?
Nope.
9. Can I get a photo of you? (Again, not in a dating app way, there are just a lot of Mathew/Mat Carpenters on Facebook.)
You can use my Twitter profile picture if you want - no professional headshots around here!
10. Will you send me some glitter?
Please don’t make me.
Mathew has had enough glitter for one man, so he’s trying to sell his idea now. Interested?
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
If they didn’t hide the outcomes to save their own mistakes than it should not have been a problem. Dishonesty from the HSE is the problem.
@Hans Vos: no the problem, as with cervical screening is that NO test is 100% accurate and you will always have false negatives. It’s nobody’s ‘fault’.
@Ciaran Bolger: I agree that no test is 100% accurate. But hiding the results so woman didn’t know their test was suspicious and ultimately ended up in full blown cancers was.
@Ciaran Bolger: false negatives might be nobody’s fault but covering up certainly was somebody’s fault.
@Hans Vos: In a blame culture like ours, informing a patient of a false negative will likely result in a legal action and collapse of the service- thats what they were afraid of , and that is what is going to happen.
The breast screening program was hit with 15 solicitors letters- best course of action would be to stop “look back” audits -to protect the programs.
@paul kelly: So you saying that women who are in the past willingly misleaded can’t have their rights executed?
@Hans Vos:
Of course you can , it just will cost millions.
@paul kelly: Don’t you think that being honest from the beginning could have avoided all the hassle. That’s the problem with the HSE . There are people, and don’t get me wrong not everybody, who think that they are more important than the truth. When it’s going wrong than they blame : 1 Somebody else.
2 Politics
.3 The system.
4 The cost.
And I can get on and on but they never blame them self.
@Hans Vos: No, being honest with a look back audit showing the screen to be a false negative will lead to a substantial payout.
Solicitors are looking at a definite new income stream.
@paul kelly: contrary to you I like to be honest.
@Hans Vos: Oh I believe honesty is the ideal , but it will cost hundreds of millions, the collapse of screning and the deaths of far more women.
@paul kelly:
Make that 16 from Monday next. There will be no collapse of the service that’s scaremongering. I never knew there was a look back service nobody ever mentioned it OR A REVIEW
I really hope that this is not:
A) Another case of our healthcare system failing women
B) People jumping on the bandwagon hoping to make a few euro!
@Jenny Kelleher: I have to disagree with your statement about looking for a few quid… in most cases including the cervical cancer cases the hse deny everything and in fact try to cover up what has happened…. nobody goes to jail, nobody is held responsible… the only retribution these people receive is a pay out… and let me tell you that it’s not an easy decision to make about bringing a case because it is a long and very difficult process.. and is even more so difficult when all you can think is,what if people think I’m doing this just for money !!
@Tommy Byrne: There was no cover up. There were false negative results discovered retrospectively (an inevitable feature of any screening programme), some women were told of this others weren’t due to failure of HSE procedures. There is no suggestion that the women’s outcomes were adversely affected as the prior false negatives were only discovered on review after a diagnosis of cancer had been made. The lawsuits pertain to the false negatives themselves. If a situation emerges where there are payouts for every false negative result then the screening programmes will be driven to bankruptcy as false negatives are an inherent statistical feature of large scale screening programmes.
@Damon16: in the cervical cancer cases it most definitely was a cover up … and who is to say there isn’t something similar happening here ? We don’t know the facts of any of the future cases that may come of this. All we are hearing is one side of the story so far… so to judge people as only in it for a few quid is very wrong
@Tommy Byrne:
Indeed ..very wrong
The medical profession and the Gov need to do a better job explaining to the public the difference between a screening test and a diagnostic test. A screening test such as breast check will invariably have some false negatives results. The Gov need to introduce legislation capping or limiting claims in the context of screening programmes. If they don’t the HSE is the HSE are going to stop running screening tests and or not bring in new screening tests due to legal exposure. This will cost many lives.
Alternatively, push for a national Irish healthcare system that looks after patients to internationally recognised, excellent standards. Adopt a class action suit with one aim; justice and improved medical standards. Don’t force individuals to take individual cases and slog through alone. Too many people end up going abroad – men who need hip replacements badly, and have been waiting in pain on long lists, for example. Don’t inflict symphysiotomy on women while the rest of the world is not crippling their own citizens with decades-old clumsy practices. Don’t sweep the outcomes under the carpet until a few suffering families have to spend all their resources to highlight real and ongoing issues and appeal to higher courts separately until they die and the files are closed.
There are lots of pros and cons to screening. Some medics (and not crackpots) would argue against most kinds of screening and a lot of unnecessary screening takes places privately (ie a money spinner). Total transparency and full disclosures are needed in public and private health care.
Do they not have ambulances to chase?
It’s no good in trying to shift the blame for problem onto women who had smear checks carried out on systemic failure on the HSE full stop.
The circus continues with the legal profession rubbing their hands with glee ,the government have to take responsibility ,this has been kept back from the media to prevent the effects it may have on the referendum .again no accountability ,put your trust in LEO and simon everything will just be fine
My god,these people think the public are fools.
@@mdmak33: Clearly some are.
Where were the tests carried out?
Were they the cheapest option?
@The Irish Bull: tested in Ireland and results read in Ireland. Totally different process to cervical screening.
have your say