Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
JAMES REILLY HAS said that while frontline services will be hit by health service budget cuts, the effects will be “mitigated”.
The Health Minister was speaking following the announcement of the Health Service Executive’s (HSE) National Service Plan yesterday. With €750 million cut from the health budget there will be as many as 555 nursing home beds closed and 3,200 people leaving the health service in Ireland.
Reilly admitted that frontline services would be impacted upon but insisted that in rejecting the first proposed National Service Plan before Christmas, he had “been able to mitigate that in a major way”.
“I’ve said all along that frontline services are going to be affected but we’re going to mitigate that as much as possible,” he told RTÉ’s Morning Ireland.
I mean I was accused in the past of shouting wolf and what I managed to do is knock a few teeth out of that wolf’s mouth but he’s still going to bite and it’s going to be sore.
Reilly insisted that despite budget cuts, screening for colon cancer has been delayed by only a few months whereas originally it would have been delayed by a year under the initial plan. “I insisted upon that,” he said of the change.
The Health Minister said he envisioned use of intermediate care facilities and that as a result more elderly people would be looked after at home. The Service Plan included a cut of 555 public nursing home beds.
Of the plans to shed 3,200 people from the health by the end of February he said there was “enough flexibility in the moratorium to move people” to ensure there was no shortage in one particular sector of the health service.
He admitted there would be an impact from the budget cuts but said the government and his department had no choice: “There is going to be an impact, this country is bankrupt.
Were in terrible trouble, health is second biggest spending department and we have to take a certain amount of responsibility in relation addressing that deficit.
Reilly also addressed the issue of the government having to inform the European Commission that it was not in a position to comply with rules requiring junior doctors to work no more than an average of 48 hours per week.
RTÉ reported that the government had told the EC it was not in position to comply with regulations for three more years. Junior doctors can in some instances work as many as 60 hours a week in the current circumstances.
“This is historical, there’s no question. You know that last year we had tremendous difficulty recruiting staff,” Reilly said. But he said that the government was facing “a myriad of problems” in the health service and this was “but one of them” that he was “very conscious of”.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Plastic cards!!! About time, only in Ireland does a student ID look more official then the drivers licence
@ Alan, very true! My friend was in the States and said they don’t accept our drivers license as ID. A joke!
i think they should just ban driving under the influence of alcohol completely, get it over and done with
Good idea but not possible as even using mouthwash or having some sherry trifle would potentially mean you fail a zero level breath test.
Finally. It’s nice to see some initiative & solid action.
Newly qualified “R” drivers will have completed 12 mandatory driving lessons and passed the driving test like everyone before them, I don’t understand the need for restrictions.
The entire driving licence-driving education system in this country is a farce. I obtained my full driving licence after only 3 months on a provisional licence. My driving test was done in the daytime in near-perfect weather conditions. I passed with flying colours. Yet nowhere in my training did I learn how to drive in driving snow conditions, in torrential rain, in icy conditions, in thick fog, at night, or indeed in any combination. Too often I see drivers at night with either no lights on or full headlights coming straight at me. We need to have a proper training system put in place that teaches people how to drive in all weather conditions similar to what is done in Finland (where they have driving centres with roads that have simulated ice conditions, gravel tracks, etc.). “R” licences are a good idea too and certainly lower drink-driving limits, but not just applied to young people – they should be applied to everyone.
how can you have different punishments for the same crime?
A lot of the ideas and initiatives are extensions or modifications to plans that were already in place; I do agree blood alcohol levels should be zero no exceptions and match that with a VRT & Tax exemption on vehicles for pubs who provide local transport. More fundamentally we need to start teaching people to drive in schools as a formal subject with the objective that everyone leaves secondary school with their full license on an ‘R’ plate.
As part of the educational process young drivers need to learn about all aspects of driving from vehicle care & maintenance to driving in difficult conditions. Many young drivers dangerously modify vehicles which can affect the handling, stopping distance and safety features of a car and don’t understand the physics behind the changes or dangerous consequences as a result of poorly modified components.
Maybe then we will see a radical change in driver behaviour and reduced road deaths amongst the most vulnerable demographic in our community. The last element we need is high visibility enforcement; we don’t have it and it needs to be introduced; round the clock checkpoints, mandatory breath testing, and car seizures for non-compliance with road traffic legislation. If we are serious we can reduce road injury & death, lower insurance premiums and be less nervous as our kids head towards driving age.
If a tester believes a person has passed the exam and is capable of driving in an educated, safe and responsible manner there should be no need for extra punishments. I agree with the extra penalty points for learner drivers as I think far too many people get their learners permit and head onto the roads with no training and in many cases no full licence driver.
The thing is people generally don’t do their driving test drunk or pick up their mobile in the middle of it. It’s these kind of behaviours that need to be eradicated from the driving mindset, doing a great U point turn during your test doesn’t mean you wont run someone over while using your phone while driving.
So someone who has their licence for less than 2 years should be punished more severely for drink driving than someone who has theirs for ten?
Don’t see why they couldn’t just set the blood alcohol limit at 0mg/100ml, it’d be a lot simpler than creating three different classes of drivers and different laws for each. The clarity would have benefits in itself.
Because it would mean potentially failing a breath test after you used mouthwash in the morning!
In Finland you have to be tested on a skid pan. And you don’t get to drive on public roads until you have your full licence. The licence test itself takes about 1 year that’s if you pass all the tests, if you fail one you have to start again from the beginning.
Probably a little away from the topic but why not just make it a zero tolerance drink driving policy….it amazes me that all countries don’t have this?
The Road Safety Authority will be put in charge of the driving licence system and the testing of commercial vehicles for roadworthiness.
So what will the staff who currently issue licences do?
And we are still left with 2 vehicle testing organisations.
What a waste of money!
have your say