Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Clinton at a book signing in New York on Tuesday Van Tine Dennis/ABACA/ABACA/PA Images

Hundreds of one-star reviews of Hillary Clinton's book removed from Amazon

It’s believed many of the reviews were posted by people who hadn’t read the book, in a deliberate bid to lower its rating.

HUNDREDS OF ONE-STAR reviews of Hillary Clinton’s new book have been removed from Amazon.

Published on Tuesday, What Happened is Clinton’s retelling of her US presidential election loss to Donald Trump last year.

As of Wednesday morning, more than 1,500 reviews appeared on Amazon. Many contained little information about the book and instead offered high praise or sharp criticism of the Democratic candidate.

It’s believed many of the reviews were posted in a deliberate bid to lower the book’s rating. The publisher of What Happened questioned so many reviews being posted within a day of the book’s release.

Simon & Schuster publisher Jonathan Karp told the Associated Press: “It seems highly unlikely that approximately 1,500 people read Hillary Clinton’s book overnight and came to the stark conclusion that it is either brilliant or awful.”

Unverified purchases 

Quartz found that, of the 1,500 or so original reviews on Amazon, “only 338 were from users with verified purchases of the book”.

The website reported yesterday: “The average rating for reviews from unverified purchases was a 2.3, while the average from a real purchase of the book was 4.9.”

Tommy Noonan, the owner of ReviewMeta (which analyses millions of reviews to help consumers find the most trustworthy ones) told Quartz: “If that was happening by random chance it would be one in a trillion chance you’d see a discrepancy like that; actually much less likely than that, from a data science perspective.

“It’s obvious that people who didn’t buy the book are rating the book much lower.”

Additional reporting by Órla Ryan

Read: ‘Bad boy of pharma’ Martin Shkreli jailed over Hillary Clinton threat

Read: ‘There is so much anger and so much deep upset’: Public inquiry opens into Grenfell Tower blaze

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
124 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel

     
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds