Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
THE FIRST MAJOR stop on the road to the White House takes place for Democratic hopefuls tonight – and Hillary Clinton will be hoping she can withstand a barrage of criticism.
The clear front-runner in the race to succeed Barack Obama, Clinton (who is polling 42% of support among Democrats) must first secure her party’s nomination for next November’s election.
That race kicks off in earnest tonight in The Wynn Hotel in Las Vegas, as CNN hosts the first debate of the Democratic primary season.
While the Republican debates have become big ratings grabbers for networks, the Democratic debate is expected to be more substantive, if much less exciting.
The debate will feature five candidates, barring a late entry from Vice President Joe Biden, with four hoping to break into the American mainstream consciousness while on a stage next to a Clinton.
They are:
Bernie Sanders – Senator, Vermont
AP / Press Association Images
AP / Press Association Images / Press Association Images
He’s polling at 25% nationally and had a stellar summer, breaking his way into the race after being seen as too far to the left previously. But does he have the staying power?
The democratic socialist is fundraising well among small donors, but lacks the resources of a Clinton or Biden and that will hurt him over the Christmas and January periods.
However, a good performance tonight will see him continue dragging the Democrats to the left. He has avoided criticising Clinton, preferring to stick to the issues.
He will be loathe to get personal with the former First Lady, but will definitely outline where he and Clinton are different.
Will that be enough for American voters?
Martin O’Malley – former Governor of Maryland
AP / Press Association Images
AP / Press Association Images / Press Association Images
O’Malley has never hidden his ambition to climb the ladder of US politics, but that doesn’t mean he’s an empty shirt.
Advertisement
He is staunchly liberal on gay rights, guns and inequality, but will appeal to moderates because of his zero-tolerance stance on policing while mayor of Baltimore.
He will emphasise his life-long party membership, a contrast to Sanders, and try to slot himself to Clinton’s left.
Expect him to come out all guns blazing – at just 1% in national polls, he needs a big performance to still be in with a chance when the first votes are cast in February.
Lincoln Chafee – former Governor of Rhode Island
AP / Press Association Images
AP / Press Association Images / Press Association Images
Chafee, like O’Malley, has lost a lot of attention to Sanders.
Initially expected to be a disruptor in the race, he has fallen into a no-man’s land over the summer.
A ferocious debater, Chafee will attack Clinton on foreign policy and could be a wild card.
Polling below 1%, a poor performance could end his race.
Jim Webb – former Senator, Virginia
Charlie Riedel
Charlie Riedel
A decorated soldier and former Secretary of the Navy and assistant Defence Secretary, Webb will go after everyone in the debate on foreign and military policy.
Webb has been lost in the shuffle in a very small field, which doesn’t bode well.
Both he and Chafee will take hope from the example of Carly Fiorina in the Republican debates, who proved that a couple of good nights can lift a campaign.
Clinton
For Hillary Clinton, the challenge tonight is appearing presidential, but not evasive, engaged, but not condescending. It will be a tough rope to walk.
While many see the deficiencies in both parties making this a procession to a coronation, Clinton will know from 2008 how quickly a campaign can go south.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
You’ll have nothing but under six year olds running around in the waiting rooms, while the real sick suffer at home. Give it to the ones that have a real medical problem. Go back to the drawing board on this one.
The problem is how does one define a real medical problem: it would create bigger bureaucracy. Ireland needs to adopt the European model of universal healthcare for all.
Ray why should children be discriminated, if my child gets sick today , I have to have €60 on me for midoc.. But I don’t have it so my child’s welfare is at risk , he’s being punished cos I don’t earn enough & doctors are selfish & greedy
Give it to NOBODY. Let everyone who goes to the doctor pay €20 for the service. As an ordinary PAYE worker I went to the doctor recently and I watched – nobody who left while I was there paid for the doctor except myself. Then I went to get my prescription for another 40 euro. 100 quid down and via taxation paid for a bunch of scroungers sitting in the waiting room also. Absolutely sick of it, excuse the pun.
So is it fair that when I bring my three year old to the doctor it ends up costing over €100 after buying medication. We queue behind those who have it free despite the fact that we pay our taxes. So why not allow our children to get it free. Those who don’t work get everything for free whereas those who work get nothing for free !!
That’s fair enough captain.. if you can’t afford to €60 for a doc for your child then… Yes maybe you need the free cover but why give it to the healthy rich ones & have “the mummy’s bring there little love ones in ten times a month with a runny nose… That doesn’t make sense… No so there no discrimination on your case, certainly wasn’t the aim.
Ray.. why give it to welfare lifers who never pay tax? Doctors are forced to supplement medical card patients with private ones. As said above a single 20e payment from everyone would solve it
Maybe Ray a standard €10 charge , I wouldn’t complain about that , & it would stamp out abuse of the system, but a €10 charge for all including medical card holders
Everyone should have to pay a basic fee for a doctors visit. Maybe €10. Every one can afford that. Anyone that claims they can’t should priorities their fiances
I don’t mind paying for when myself and the kids need to go to the GP..It does boil my blood to see people who contribute nothing to society get everything handed to them.. However you get nothing for nothing in this Country.. So if the Government are paying a GP €50 for your child to see them, no doubt thay will take multiples of that out of your wages in tax…
David, you’re mistaken with regard to the payments for medical cards and this proposed fee for under 6′s. GPs only get around €10-13, if I’m not mistaken, for each patient on medical card and the same for the proposed free under 6′s. Private patients would pay €50-60 however.
David this scheme is for under 6 , not the medical card . Now we shouldn’t put under 6 in different social classes & treat them that way but that’s exactly what the GPs are doing . If a child got hit by a car & an Irish doctor was walking by , I’d say you would have to throw him 50 euro before he moves to help , they’re as bad as bankers !!
In all fairness ITS Student… Although he didn’t specify, I think David was referring to people who choose not to work, rather than the disabled. You’re putting words in his mouth. David is spot on with his comment on people getting everything handed to them. There are people out there working cash in hand and receiving social welfare, I’ve met them. There are also people who refuse to work, refuse to contribute, and get a house and cash handed to them! I’m a sole trader, if I’m out of work, I’m done, I get nothing. And plenty of disabled people work to anyway! Get off the stage ITS!
Doctors are always doing unpaid work off duty. There is no way any doctor would walk past an injured person and not help. I’ve seen and experienced doctors offering free medical treatment in emergency situations first hand. So I’d say you’re wrong there. It’s unfair to demonise a profession like that.
4% of the 400,000 unemployed have not worked (includes those with health issues, etc). So let’s be honest, that’s exactly who David and yourself are referring to.
People lie. People lie to the social welfare and they lie again in market research. Best not to take the figures as gospel. No one ever questions the research agencies who compile this stuff. You see, not everyone who says they are disabled, are actually disabled. For instance, people who make bogus insurance claims are often unable to work… plus, there’s are cases of other welfare payments being exploited such as rent allowance and single mother allowances, grant money… and as I said previously, people working cash in hand… not contributing…
I know Rory, those little under 6 are always lying.. Little feckers!! They should pay their own way in this country & fork up 50 . Ya know it’s not St Vincent de Paul the GPs are running here .
Ha! Good one Captain! You’re right, they do lie too! In all seriousness though, I think free medical care for all would be great. I have no issue with the proposed under 6′s scheme, if it’s done correctly, and doesn’t result in medical practices closing down. That would result with entire areas having no medical care provider. To do this properly the Gov needs to have big money. Right now all they are doing is playing politics with people’s health. Unfeasible promises…
It was in response to Captains comment that an Irish doctor would walk past an injured child without helping unless someone threw him a €50. I was merely pointing out instances where I had seen doctors contradict his statement.
The idea there is this magical wasteful spending that can be saved is not true. The minister has to sign off on checks being paid every day on her desk. Given the level of accounting controls in place, there is no magical money left to make savings from. You can only go so far with that argument.
However, the level of checks on the self-employed appear quite small by European standards. Perhaps this could be looked at…
The level of checks should be increased on everyone ITS Student. Including the self-employed, which includes me. Absolutely!
To say that there is no way of making savings within the current government would be something I would disagree with.
And with regard to the level of accounting controls, I’m afraid they are poor. TDs and Councillors still have unvouched expenses. You should try and get your hands on a list of declared Gov expenses. Once you read it, you’ll see that savings can be made. I’m not saying it’s enough to fix the health system. But savings can be made.
Rory , to clarify. GPs are NOT payed per visit for medical card holders. Paid an annual fee not matter how many times that child chooses to visit. If govt give ‘ free’ GP care to all in the morning at current pay rates no GP in the country would be solvent.
Thanks for clarifying that Helen. Found a figure from 2009 on Irishpatients.ie. It said it cost an average of €302 per medical card per year. Not sure how accurate it is though.
There used to be free clinics for preschoolers and school nurses who did vaccinations and annual health checks on all kids, and could call in doctors for kids in primary and secondary education. What happened to that more sensible scheme?
McConville should remember that the taxpayers are funding this initiative not the medicos. If the medicos wish to give up Practice then so be it. Others medicos may want to make a living. If he believes that Practices are going to leave the City areas in any event , whats his gripe?
By the way , he should realise , being from Cavan , that there is life outside of Dublin and that this is a good scheme for a great number of his customers who find it hard to meet very high GP fees.
Exactly Richard it’s wrong , they’re is no private care in this country for children and rightly so , there shouldn’t be any charge for kids either .. Some parents can’t afford it so the child’s welfare is at risk . Doctors are just plain greedy looking for their 50 euros
I would assume because you love your children, but besides that just because someone else is getting something for nothing it doesn’t mean it’s good for them or they don’t need it.
I always had to pay here and no I didn’t like it as with the NHS nobody paid to go to the doctor, but the warning is the waiting rooms were full of time wasters, people with colds or thought they had some horrable disease and just wanted anti-biotics even though they had no idea what they do.
The thought that these people would have easy access and would drag their kids though the mill for the attention and because it was free actually scares me.
On the other hand, loads of kids would benefit greatly from access to a service they couldn’t otherwise avail from due to lack of money in the family.
Medical cards are great for sure for children but you still need to get to the doctor in the first case for the initial diagnosis which in some cases would be too late as the illness could have become fatal.
Personally I would be happy to pay (and have) if I thought my children needed it and wouldn’t think for a moment that someone who couldn’t afforded it shouldn’t get it for free.
After all, it is about the children and they’ve enough dept coming their way as it is
Thanks but I’m well versed in the concept of both… And Wikipedia is not a source, I could edit that page to make it about anything I wished. I could define socialism as an animal husbandry practice if I so wanted…
People’s health is being used as a political football in this feud.
I think the HSE is not fit for purpose and at this stage is a top heavy asset consuming beast.
Somebody needs to say “stop” and cut the losses.
The HSE as a model and structure needs to be scrapped and a new model designed from the bottom up and including GP’s .
Consultation needs to start at a grassroots level to provide a working model .
The only income.under sixes have is social welfare’s child benefit.
Not all parents even middle income wage can afford a trip to the doctors for their children. It’s hard to imagine being a parent with a sick child and not been able to go to the doctors. Sad so sad.
Dare I suggest that it’s supply and demand at play and that south Dublin had more GPs because the residents of South Dublin place their health higher on their list of priorities.
If you want to open up a debate on equality how many north Dublin residents have their health care provided for them via medical cards vs. South Dublin residents who pay for their own?
Supply and demand, or market forces are all about profit. Surely people’s health should be placed above such things.
Also the reason north side dubliners get medical cards is generally because they can’t afford the health care. How is that inequality? As you are alluding to.
The EU average for a GP visit is €35 , why is it €50 to €60 here in Ireland?? Also the real suffering in all of this is the working class who are not entitled to a medical card . I knew FG would never push this thru , it seemed to good to be true !!
Because the 50-60 euro in Ireland is used to subsidise the insufficient income from the medical card patients.
If there was the possibility of making more money in Ireland than in Europe – Ireland would be full of European doctors. I’m not aware of tens, let alone hundreds of doctors from Germany, the Netherlands or the UK (all countries with excellent English) coming here to work.
Meanwhile, Irish GPs travel to the UK or Australia, like their working conditions, and like the fact that they don’t get called greedy money grabbers for asking to get paid to do a complex job, with major responsibilities.
Children with cancer have their medical cards taken off them but Enda Kenny and Co still give Children’s Allowance to their rich CEO’s friends and their friends earning hundreds of thousands of euro per year.
Now Fine Gael and Labour want to reward their millionaire rich friends even more by giving them free medical care for their rich children while ordinary sick people lie on hospital trollies !!!
The NAGP really sunk to a new low with this .. Using the trolleys as an excuse.. Truth is they are happy to take 50 euro from struggling parents hands … If I get sick , I never go to doctors cos I can’t afford it .. I usually let the immune system kill it off but when your child gets sick , he needs a doc , sometimes we can’t afford it for them .
By your logic, children have no immune systems. Incorrect. 86% of children’s doctors visits are resolved by better educated parents knowing the difference between a cold and the abuse of a medical card.
Pani , so if my child’s temperature rockets , & neurofen doesn’t work .. I just let him ride the storm ?? Be nice explaining that to a judge you thick !!
In January alone I had both kids at the doctor at €50 a pop plus medication. January, the worst month of the year for most financially, but my kids come first and I had to squeeze the cash from somewhere. I work and pay my taxes. The mother down the road can bring all four of her kids to the doctor for free whenever she bloody well likes because she hasn’t bothered to work since her eldest was born.
Please, tell me people can see the injustice here. I wouldn’t mind paying a nominal fee of €20 per child, if everyone, including SW recipients, had to pay it. But Jesus, €50 to confirm a throat infection plus prescribe antibiotics, a total of 5 minutes of a doctor’s time, is absolutely scandalous!
In this govts first budget in 2011 (yes 2011) they introduced free gp care for those with long term illnesses. Not a promise but an actual budget measure. It never came to pass. Can’t wait til the media pick up on that. Good luck with the under 6 thing, given that was a budget measure from only a year ago.
It is good to know that the Leo Varaker has some extra money to extend
medical cards to extra people. But to give that extra to people who can afford their own health care rather than to parents of children with chronic or even terminally health problems is not the way to spend that money. Since its inception, the Irish College of GPs has had as its policy free GP. Care for all. Since the recession rural GPs in Ireland have seen their resources cut by 43% under FEMPI. People may have seen a couple with a a small boy at the gates of Leinster House this week begging for a medical card for their son. Spend that money for the needy, not the vociferous.
How dare us expect under sixes to get a health care, not for free as it would be paid for at a cheaper price by the tax payer. Great way of getting children looked after in the early stages, yet the same people who pledged to look after sick people want a pound of flesh instead. Shame on the profession who agree to this and congrats to those who do right and reject it.
Just on the question of GP fees, a small point for your attention. The average GP fee is about 50 euros. The average patient attends their GP four times a year, therefore two hundred per year. The “free” GP care for all scheme as proposed by Dr James Reilly has been costed at sixteen hundred euros per person per annum. Be very careful what you wish for.
We can argue all day about who should get what etc but the simple point is children under 6 regardless of class background should be treated equally hence they should get free cover .. But GPs real agenda here is to keep charging parents €50 per child , they are using this story to justify their actions.. Plain & simple!!
Its not about the money. It’s about starting up something without planning it properly, back up etc. You might as well say free electricity to everyone and free Gas to everyone. GP surgeries just like every other business should be properly equipped to deal with certain amount of patients/clients otherwise it is just gambling and I for one wouldn’t want someone to gamble with my health.
It’s a sickening feeling (no pun intended) to have a sick child at home and you have to decide between food and bringing them to the doctors. I’m sure some parents will abuse it but the majority won’t. See that cough in your 2 yr old turning into a nasty chest infection, or that temperature reaching dangerous levels with an empty bank account and tell me you don’t agree with free doctors for under 6′s
That if the GPs which this organization represents are so concerned with an inequality and availability of GP care in north vs. South Dublin. They should set up some more clinics in North Dublin and lower their prices.
Another bit of divide and conquer from our government. Just look at the comments to see the truth. Fix the trolly and medical card problems first, instead of tinkering at the edges.
CIE run a scheme for their staff in which they pay 5€ a week direct from their wages and then receive free doctor visits with an assigned doctor in their area. Something along these lines would be very beneficial. Obviously this would end up being subsidised but I still think it could be a workable system
Enoch Burke's family forcibly removed from St Patrick's Day event in Washington DC
Jane Matthews
Reports from Washington DC
2 hrs ago
2.7k
The Morning Lead
Trump's US-Ireland trade deficit obsession is part of a wider battle, but how hurt could Ireland get?
Paul O'Donoghue
4 hrs ago
2.2k
25
Last Orders
Donald Trump threatens 200% tariffs on alcohol from EU countries
Updated
11 hrs ago
38.9k
148
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 156 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 106 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 137 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 106 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 79 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 78 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 38 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 34 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 127 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 60 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 75 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 82 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 39 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 45 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 89 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 96 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 71 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 52 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 86 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 66 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say