Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL has been working to bring voids – or empty houses and flats belonging to the council – back into use, with some especially for homeless people.
But all of the funding for these voids still hasn’t been given to the council by the Department of Environment.
The Department of Environment told TheJournal.ie that it “hopes to make the allocations to all LAs [local authorities] in respect of voids shortly”.
It should be noted that not all voids are set aside for homeless persons. Minister Kelly has issued directions to the four Dublin local authorities that 50 of all housing allocations be set aside for homeless and vulnerable families.
Local authorities can draw down funding as they complete the works.
Sinn Féin Councillor Daithí Doolan asked DCC Chief Executive Owen Keegan how much funding has been released by the Department of Environment for bringing vacant properties back into productive use.
Keegan supplied him with the following figures:
He also asked how many voids out of the total 1046 have been brought back into productive use since December 2014.
The Chief Executive said in reply:
To date 316 units have been brought back to productive use and there are currently 196 viable voids which will be returned to production over the next two quarters.
Asked how many homeless households have been housed since December 2014, Keegan said:
The total number of homeless households that have been housed in the first quarter of 2015 (January – March) are 236. The significant rate of move on is to social housing via local authority allocations (193), with only 43 households moving onto private rented. This in conjunction with Q4 2014 (43) is a record low number of households moving onto private rented in the Dublin region.
The council said that no notification has been received yet from the department of its Section 10 Homeless Funding Allocation for 2015.
Cllr Doolan told TheJournal.ie he put the question to the council as he “couldn’t figure out where this money is going”.
“The city council is now forced into a situation of spending money it doesn’t have in getting voids ready,” he said.
He added that councillors are trying to seek a meeting with the Minister on the issue.
“I’m not only annoyed, I’m shocked that the money still hasn’t been released,” he said.
Vacant properties
The Department said that in 2014, Dublin City Council returned 467 vacant properties to productive use with funding support from the Department at a cost of €6,163,464.
It added that funding made available under Budget 2015 will see 1,000 vacant units nationally being returned to productive use this year.
These will be allocated on an “equitable and evidence-based system, based on the priorities submitted by local authorities, the degree of local housing need, the current numbers of vacant units, the length of time properties have been vacant and the cost effectiveness of the proposal”.
Proposals for works under this initiative received from local authorities are currently under consideration, and details of allocations will be issued shortly, added the department.
Minister Kelly and Junior Minister Paudie Coffey announced the Government’s 20-point action plan on tackling homelessness last December. It committed to €20m-plus in expenditure overall.
The plan said:
all housing authorities throughout the country will return all their general void properties to productive use as a matter of urgency and such properties should comply with basic standards of accommodation including space standards in accordance with the Department of the Environment, Community and Local Government’s guidelines.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
I can tell you from personal experience that he’s lying.
Proof?
I had 2 friends whom worked with them at different times and said they were the worst place ever to work for. They had a button on their PCs that they had to hit if they wanted to use the loo and hit again on return, at the end of month their total loo time was reviewed. Said that there was large staff turnabout every month and some people didn’t even stick a full week at times.
Some people are just scared of hard work.
Lindsay the new resident troll. At least you’re consistent.
I just asked for proof. How is it trolling to learn more about something?
Get back to work… *whip sound effects*
get a job there and relay us your experience after a month.
Amazon pays it’s employees well and no one forces them to work there.
“Lindsay Price” and “Katie Byrne” are one in the same trolls, this appears to be in place of there full time jobs.. if he/she/it has one!
Don’t feed her guys
stinking troll
@Vincent f
Any call centre that takes incoming calls has an unavailable to take call button. Many out going have similar if using an auto dialler. You use it when you go to the toilet or deal with paper work then press it when you can take calls. They are reviewed to judge performance. It isn’t individual toilet break logging.
You made it sound so sinister but you are getting the information 2nd hand. You can see somebody not pulling their weight very quickly but it isn’t hard work but repetitive and doesn’t suit everyone . Call centres have a high turnover but generally people that last 6 months can handle it and stay. Not
Vincent, That loo button really hit the fan. I know someone who knows someone…
At this very moment I work for Amazon and for the past about 40min I was away from my desk, no one knew where. (Went to top up my phone and have some late lunch)
There are 2 guys that took their laptop with them and play 8 ball in the atrium, other 2 play ping-pong. Recreation areas are available and you can work from there. IE monitoring or babysitting processes that take long time to complete.
My work day is exactly 8h and it includes lunchbreak and even commuting time later so I miss the traffic. (I start my work in the morning at home) You can work from anywhere and some people take advantage of this and work from other countries a few days a week while going in longer breaks.
So, please… Don’t be jealous!
I am saying exactly what I said. Did not say NYTimes is lying, but I am 100% they can’t know better than me, working there for over almost 2 years.
However I believe there might be something going on in logistics part of Amazon. I’ve seen too a CH4? 1h insight in Amazon UK Logistics. I imagine there’s like pizza delivery. People have low education and some managers may have become too full of themselves. So I can’t say anything about that department. However I believe they prefer to leave than reach higher.
On the other hand Amazon is huge! They have also the largest fleet of servers, bigger than Google. Those servers account for more than 10% of total traffic on the internet.
I wish everyone had a manager like I do! Both of them actually (my manager’s manager too). I have been talking to managers my line more than half way up to Bezos and found them very open. (Amazon is a pretty flat company)
I even know that Facilities manager asked the cleaners contracted company to have the eastern-european girl promoted as supervisor because she was doing all the work (and well) pushed around by the two Irish bags who did nothing but hide and smoke or block us from using the kitchen at lunchtime. Now kitchen is available and that girl is having a lunch break (late like I do (because I like it this way)) too which is good. I think this is an example that whenever is brought to attention, the Amazon environment is very fair.
We are not a soulless company he says as we look directly through his hollow eye sockets.
Worked in a very similar environment. In an office of 3 staff a dozen employees had passed through the doors in approximately 5 years. I lasted 3 months. Was told I was good to last that long. One lad only lasted one week. Workers on the ground had no respect for office staff as they knew they’d be gone in a few months. Boss gave enough work for 2 employees. Your set up to fail. Life is to short to work in a place you hate.
Very easy to say that’s not the Amazon he recognises when everybody is falling over themselves to lick his arse.
Isn’t that the problem. It’s very hard to complain about what’s wrong and how things can be improved to your boss. They are usually surrounded in yes men and told what they want to hear. Unfortunately in my experience if you have a big ego and are willing to tramp on anyone who gets in your way you’ll go far. Sad but true in most cases.
Except in Amazon there is no boss just managers. Everyone has one to one meetings every fortnight with their manager and a bit more rarely with the next manager in line where you can say your piece. If two is not enough you can talk to HR at any time. You can walk in any office at anytime. You give reviews to your manager towards higher managers 2 times a year. I never had any feeling of reluctance that I can’t say anything I want.
However, I don’t know what is happening everywhere, but I doubt is any different since the what I described above here seems to be the general policy.
I honestly am sorry that Amazon gets targeted by such articles.
Same stuff goes on with other Multinationals here the one I worked for used to have a review process where co-workers had to review each other and find fault or areas of improvement for you. Basically if you didn’t like a co-worker you could hammer them! They also had the tendency to promote people into management positions who had zero people management skills and the stress and abuse these guys dished out was terrible.
I wonder would he be willing to go on the us TV show “undercover boss” and prove his point
‘Paid Volunteers’ what a load of crap. His thought’s are d
In my opinion any employer who refuses to engage collectively with their workers, through their trade unions has no right to offer an opinion upon the type of workplace it is.
I’m sure he does think it’s a great place to work. I wonder how many multiples of his employees average salary he earns.
Yes you are, Mister. Stop lieing and mend your ways you horrible git.
I love my Kindle fire……
Obviously not, it’s Amazon, not the Hunger Games.
Wow it’s amazing that people are just commenting on this now. Practices like those highlighted in the article have been in force throughout the companys history. For more information please read “The Everything Store: Jeff Bezos and the age of Amazon”, business book of the year 2013.
It probably depends on the position and office. But on average, Amazon looks to me as a more demanding work environment. I have some colleagues there and it looks like they do work under bigger pressure and more hours then then the rest of us in other IT companies.
have your say