Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Shutterstock/Bohbeh

Mother who says her daughter was injured during "muddled" delivery loses case

The woman claimed there was excessive traction used in the delivery.

Updated at 10:55pm

A FOUR-YEAR-OLD girl, whose mother sued the HSE in the High Court for injury to the baby during delivery at Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, Drogheda, Co Louth, lost her claim for damages today.

Mr Justice Michael White said Lisa Everard (34) claimed that excessive traction was applied to her daughter Sophie’s head when shoulder dystocia had allegedly been diagnosed, leaving her with weakness in her left elbow and shoulder. The claims of negligence had been denied by the HSE.

Judge White said in a reserved judgment that shoulder dystocia is defined as a delivery that requires additional obstetrics manoeuvres to release the shoulders after gentle downward traction has failed.

He said the HSE denied that there had been a shoulder dystocia emergency as alleged by Ms Everard but precautions had been made because Sophie’s head had been tight around her mother’s perineum.

The HSE had also denied that the traction imposed on Sophie’s head had caused her any injury to her arm and shoulder.

Ms Everard had alleged there had been a failure on part of the hospital staff to maintain a calm and collective approach to the delivery of the baby.

She had claimed that the delivery had been complete two minutes after delivery of Sophie’s head and that this implied a degree of panic and excessive traction on the baby’s head and neck.

Medical evidence had alleged that the doctor who delivered the baby had acted in a “muddled” manner and had panicked and employed an inappropriately strong force to achieve an unnecessarily rapid delivery.

Judge White, dismissing Ms Everard’s claim and adjourning the matter of legal costs to a date in October, said the doctor was a very experienced practitioner and the HSE had established without doubt that there were other possible causes to Sophie’s injury.

“In fact the more likely cause was injury to Sophie’s left arm and shoulder when it was posterior in the womb,” the judge said.

First published at 6pm

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
11 Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds