Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
THE NEW PRISON to be built at Thornton Hall in north county Dublin – which was originally planned to house 2,200 prisoners – will now be built to accommodate just 500 people.
The government has accepted the recommendation of an independent review group which says the new facility should only contain 300 cells, a significant downscale of the 1,400-cell facility originally planned.
The intention of the Fianna Fáil-Progressive Democrat government which bought the site in 2005 was that the new facility would allow for the eventual closure of Dublin’s main prison at Mountjoy.
The plan also suggests that a new 200-cell prison be built at Kilworth in Co Cork, with the prison on Cork’s north inner city being closed “at the earliest possible opportunity”.
Advertisement
The review group also recommends that both facilities be built with ‘step-down accommodation’, which effectively provides for an open centre with a secure perimeter.
Shatter said this proposal would “enable prison authorities to give greater operational effect to the ‘principle of progression’ in the penal system.
The proposed prison complexes will allow the prison authorities to create incentivised prison regimes to allow offenders progress through the system in a way that helps their eventual reintegration into society. ”
The minister added that he agreed with the group’s statement that building new prisons was not the sole way of tackling prison overcrowding, but that other strategies should also be used.
A decision on the timeframe for building the two new facilities will be made in the autumn when the government decides its capital spending priorities for 2012.
As of last Friday there were 5,479 people in the prison system, though 612 were on temporary release due to overcrowding alone.
The purchase of the Thornton Hall site caused great controversy at the time, when the government paid around €30m for the plot – considered significantly above the market price at the time.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Finally justice for Elaine and her family, he discarded her like an
animal and went on with his life as normal, intriguing case, great work by all who made this day happen
I’m convinced half the red thumbs that dont make sense are from people with hyper sensitive smart phones that accidentally press red thumb while scrolling — ????
From the judges direction and the evidence it seems like the conviction maybe very unstable.
It may not withstand an appeal. I am not surprised people think justice has been done but it really doesn’t seem like it. Alternative lifestyle doesn’t mean guilt
From the time he was arrested there was information drip fed by the Gardai to the media, they in turn had him convicted in the minds of the general public before the trial even began,
“knowing he’s guilty” “sure who else could it be” “sure he’s into weird kinky stuff” is a helllllllllll (or at least it should be) of a long way away from proving he done it,
Their is no proof phone was his – name never mentioned & never contacted anyone else off it. Only evidence is that it was in similar area’s to Dwyers phone
Listening to the evidence and the story in general made me sick to my stomach. Can you imagine a sicko like that walking the streets ! Glad he is behind bars and I would not describe that mans activities as an alternative lifestyle !!
If you leave a joint of meat on the table in a locked house empty but for a dog and come back to find the joint is gone and the dog is happy there is no direct evidence, but beyond reasonable doubt the dog ate it.
alright people are getting sidetracked on the phone evidence. The main point here is how can someone be convicted of murder when we can’t be sure if there even was one???
1. No cause of death
2. No witness
3. No murder weapon
“Circumstantial evidence and guilty beyond reasonable doubt are two diametrically opposed positions.”
Actually, this is not the case. Circumstantial evidence is safe to use IF there is no reasonable alternative explanation for it.
And given the address of his family being used for one phone, a name very similar to a friend of Dwyers being used for one phone, and given that Elaine O’Hara had the number on her computer with the word “Graham” beside it, not to mention the uncanny resemblance to the life of “Sir / Master” with the life of Graham Dwyer, there was no other reasonable explanation.
Graham Dwyer is not 100% guilty. He’s not 1000% guilty. He’s not 100000% guilty either. He is guilty to the point of infinity, multiplied by infinity again.
I think he will appeal, as given all the evidence he is a raging narcissist, but I think it will fail and I hope he spends the rest of his natural days behind bars.
Emotions run strong in the immediate aftermath of an event like this SOC, but they dont help.
There were a number of alternative explanations incl suicide. There was no actual evidence of murder.
Apart from texts that link to his movemonts, violent sexual material on his computer next to family photos and other compelling evidence that we didn’t see or hear that the jury did. He can appeal the ruling like anyone else convicted if he is innocent and can prove it he will be released. But its not for us to pass judgement thats for the jury and they made the decision.
@Colm Moloney”Their is no proof phone was his – name never mentioned & never contacted anyone else off it. Only evidence is that it was in similar area’s to Dwyers phone”
As the judge or somebody said in regard to the phone evidence ‘ if it wasn’t the accused then it was somebody with a remarkably similar life to that of the accused’ (not a direct quote)
Debbie you along with a lot of other people on this don’t seem to be getting my point. I am not saying I think he is innocent but my point it the way the case was handled from the start and all the info leaked throughout. Whether is is innocent or guilty is is very hard to argue that he received a fair trial as he has been vilified from day one.
And then onto the judges direction to jury that they “had to be satisfied that she was murdered by stabbing beyond reasonable doubt” – was returned with a [unuamious] guilty verdict to this despite the fact there is no physical evidence or such is highly dubious.
Personally I feel that if it goes to appeal [which it is bound to] in front of a 3 judge panel that he will walk
Colm, Suicide is not a reasonable possibility here. Do you seriously think that Elaine O Hara left her car in Shanganagh cemetery and walked 30 KM to Varty Resevoir to throw in her stuff including car keys ( and his phone) and then hiked another 30KM over the dublin mountains to Kilakee to kill herself?
A trained athlete couldn’t do it in one day, much less a depressed woman of her age. It’s a ridiculous hypotheses. Somebody drove her, and that somebody is tthe person who stabbed her before and threatened on to stab her ” in the guts” upon her release from hospital.
You really can’t see past your own predijuce.
If God is omniscient, then he created Dwyer in the full knowledge that he’d use his “free will” to do this. God, if he exists is either incompetent or a malevolent psychopath.
And unfair play to the reporters who insisted on publishing the most salacious details of these people’s, and others, sex lives. We didn’t need to know any of that.
I did jury duty once, It was for a drug offence and lasted two days and that was pretty exhausting. I can’t imagine the stress of being on the jury for this trial.
I think this is the right decision, and I would have been so upset it it wasn’t a guilty verdict. Thank God for justice, he can stop trying to fool everyone now.
Bevin… I would say that hopefully his wife will realise that her and her kids have had an extremely lucky escape. It may be very hard for them now but if he was allowed to live freely after this,who knows what might have happened.
I didn’t say being married to him was a lucky escape. I’m saying him being convicted of a murder and not being in the house with his wife and kids is. Whether his wife knew what he was like or she didn’t,either way, they’re all safer now today.
It’s the right verdict. But there’s nothing good about being found guilty of murder. Elaine O’Hara’s family have to deal with their loss and with her personal life been flashed across every new paper. And his family have to live with the knowledge their Husband/Father/Son was not who they thought. I’m sure he is effectively dead to them.
Jeni I don’t mean that she was lucky to marry him. She s lucky that she and her kids didn’t end up in a situation where they would be on the front pages of every paper someday.
Thank you to the jury and all involved. It can’t have been easy listening to what that sick ba*tard did to poor Elaine.
Maybe now her poor family, and his innocent family, can start to try and get over this awful crime.
To think that he nearly got away with it, hopefully life means life for the life that he murdered.
Must have thought he would get away with it too, all those txt messages so incriminating. Good police work too.
Glad justice has been done, he and many others preyed on this poor Lady who had severe mental issues. Hope her family find some comfort on Todays result, also thinking of the guilty parties family i do not believe they had any knowledge of their Father/husbands sick twisted mind. i believe he has done this before, i wonder is there any other bodies waiting to be found. Hope he rots in his cell. RIP Elaine.
Also would love for Gardai to consider him a suspect for the Rainaird Murray which happened near his home by his weapon of choice. Elaine’s murder was not his first, most definatly not. How many more Elaine’s are out there waiting to be found.
Severe mental illness or suffered from depression. Not quite the same thing. I don’t think Elaine was quite the innocent party you think she was. She played her role in this too.
Typical blame the victim! Regardless of her lifestyle her life was taken and her body left to rot while her family worried for her. Your comment sickens me.
@McConnell Mary. You’re right, she wasn’t innocent in the way that she consented to *certain* things. She was a grown woman and I guess she thought she knew what she was doing. However her naivety where alternative lifestyles are concerned is what got her in trouble.
But, that naivety came from a place of mental imbalance and extreme vulnerability… which made her an easy target for a predator like Dwyer. He obviously toyed with her weaknesses and coerced her into doing things that she wasn’t comfortable with. THIS is why that poor woman WAS innocent in all this.
I truly hope that all family members get some peace now, and can move on with their lives.
Laura thank you for expressing exactly what I thought of Mary McConnell’s comment. I was temporarily too angry to formulate a remark. ‘She played her role in this too’? Oh, well then, that’s alright so
Was absolutely written in stone he done it. Some of the text messages that the media released made me sick. Glad that justice can finally be found for her.
From a phone not linked to him by evidence. Very unsettling such circumstantial evidence was used at all. I don’t know the truth but a worrying use of information in court case
Not linked to him by evidence – apart from the fact that it accompanied him around the country for years, and only left his side when it was dumped along with “the awful woman’s” own phone. Lot of circumstances there. Guilty as sin, hope he rots.
Hats off to the Gardai for their incredible work in piecing it all together. They got lucky with the phones, but once they did, a huge task was still required to get this nutter convicted.
Also i believe Dwyer did this before and believe Gardai have already started to put things in motion to profile unsolved murders. Rainord Murray died a stones throw from this guys house by his favorite weapon of choice.
Yes someone told me as the crow flies its under 1 mile to his house. Be interesting to see in the short future if the Gardai do anything. Be peace of mind for the Murray family. But for me there is a big red flag here.
That jury have done a service for us all, and one none of us I think would like to have been called to do. As have the Gardai with their meticulous investigation.
But most of all they have done a service for poor Elaine O’Hara and her family. I hope they can find peace after what they have been through.
Very sad thing to even suggest. What do you want people to be like when they get out of prison? Experienced rapists with knife skills and/or angry rape victims.
I’m sorry, are you some kind of moral authority? Do you want me to apologise to you or something? I couldn’t give a toss if you find my comments “ok” or not.
Well done to the Gardai involved for gathering the evidence and putting the case together. Well done to the Jury for sitting through a harrowing case and finding him guilty.
Things like that happen a lot and may have no bearing on an appeal. I always felt that if he was to appeal it would be because his defence was lacking. I expected his team to be more aggressive given the serious nature of the case….. Graham dwyer is a game player I wouldn’t be surprised if this is the trick up his sleeve.
My heart goes out to both families.
We owe a debt to the Gardaí for the painstaking, meticulous investigation into what was a very difficult and upsetting case, while they also went home at night to their homes and families carrying the burden of such horror.
I cannot imagine the grief and anguish that Elaine’s family have been through, from her disappearance, the search for her and this awful trial, where her whole life was laid bare. And their journey is far from over. I hope at least a little of their pain is relieved by today’s verdict.
And Elaine, you’ve touched the hearts of the whole nation. You were the one on trial but ultimately not judged. You will never be forgotten. Rest in peace.
The police did really really well. The Garda in Roundwood who was in 18 inches of water pulling things out of the muck when (at that time) there was no significance to them – brilliant work. The jury made the right decision today. Based on the evidence given to the court, only a fool would believe he was not guilty.
Thank God this awful evil man has been put away .MAY Elaine rest in Peace now and lets not forget the Judge Jury Lawyers and witnsses in this trial it cannot have been easy for them Well done to all of you
That jury deserve so much praise… What an awful job to have to look at so much disturbing evidence. Having read the reports over the last few weeks I had formed the opinion that he was guilty so I agree with the outcome that said it is not an easy process being on a jury I’m sure the trial and the weight of deciding on someone else’s life takes a toll. Well done to all who investigated, prosecuted and convicted. I hope elaine’s family feel that she got the justice she deserved. This case was so tragic. Elaine was just a woman struggling with mental illness and looking for someone to show her love.
Hopefully all involved can now start on the road of healing and counselling,safer for everybody that he is removed from society,let’s hope he is not given internet access while in prison because he would only start tormenting other vulnerable women
This guy was so arrogant to think he was untouchable and committed the perfect murder. I for one am thrilled to see this sadistic, manipulative excuse of a human being has been convicted.
Unfortunately for Elaine’s family they will always have to live with what this monster did.
While justice has been served there are no “winners” in this. The victims family had to hear truely horrific things about their daughter/sisters life, Dwyers wife and children have been humiliated, all under the scrutiny of the media.
I wonder if the gardai are investigating if there were other victims?
Oh Thank God… I for one will sleep better tonight knowing that nutter is locked away!! The best result all women & children in this country could hope for.. Well done to all the jury for making the right choice & hopefully saving other lives by not letting this guy back out on our streets!! Jill Meagher’s death is one lesson too many!! RIP Elaine & Jill
Thing is, the dirty b*****d won’t rot anywhere. Will be out in no time on parole and good behavior etc etc. Send him to Utah in front of the firing squad.
What’s the media gonna do now all this is over? Good to see him found guilty in what seemed a heinous crime, but media voyeurism in this case was excessive to say the least
Very worried there could be a successful appeal and/or a retrial, given the judge’s bizarre carry-on this week. Anyone else think his instructions were overly biased towards acquittal as well?
RIP Elaine. Nobody should be treated that way ever, consensually or not.
Of course murder is a definite NO NO, and I don’t believe she would consent to being murdered. It was just the way you phrased it… “treated that way”. It kind of implies all the other stuff.
Spot on Jeni, this poor lady suffered severe mental issues and people took advantage of that and whould have talked here into doing things a person of sound mind wouldn’t. Some sick men out there if they think this type of behaviour is fine.
Murder is obviously totally and undoubtedly crossing the line in terms of consent. What I mean is that bdsm in general is a tricky area morally, but as long as what is happening is consensual, and partners are of sound mind, we really cannot dictate their lifestyle to them. Once again stating that murder is not ok in any circumstance, even extreme bdsm. It feels ridiculous even saying it, something which should go without question. Anyways, he manipulated her mental illness and her bdsm tendencies so he could kill her, and he has been rightfully found guilty. God help her family.
Gerry – read my posts properly why don’t you. Nobody consents to murder. Nobody. Why on earth that appears so difficult for you to understand I don’t know.
Ok now for the sentence, unfortunately we can’t execute him. So he could walk free in 7 years or he could die in prison and that’s up to the Judge and future Justice Ministers.
He HAS to sentence him to life in prison but he can parole after 7
The judge can extend the lack of parole for the first 30 years – he should
Then the minister can veto his release even then – he/she should (I hope it’s me just so I can stamp a big fat REJECTED on his file)
Delighted he has been convicted, just a pity he couldn’t have pleaded guilty from the beginning and not have had sordid details from Elaine’s sex life printed all over the media, tarnishing her memory!
Thank god justice is served. Although I can’t help think prison is too good for him. If he does get out early justice will be served on him on the streets and hopefully he will come up against someone to put him through the same pain and suffering he’s put others through.
It was probably the correct decision, but unfortunately, the decision will be overturned as the judge erred in law and was ultimately incompetent. He failed to allow the jury to consider a manslaughter verdict and this will be successfully appealed. In addition, for a judge to say he agreed with the verdict “110%”? displays childishness and inexperience and underlines the fact that he was only appointed to the High Court last October by Fine Gael and is clearly out of his depth.
Augustus Hoop; What grounds are you basing your assumption on? I am basing my assumptions on instances in common law such as in the McNally case where Justice Carney did not allow the jury to acquit McNally or in other orbiter cases such as in R. v. Parent, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 761, 2001 SCC 30, where the appeal court held that the jury could find the appellant guilty of the manslaughter of his wife rather than of murder as charged by the judge et alia…Thus limiting the jury’s instructions and restricting the accused’s rights under law to a fair and reasonable trial.
Paul, the fact is that there is no requirement to offer manslaughter as an alternative (check out the criminal justice act).
However the facts of an individual case may require it. I assume that in the ward case (and the others you refer to) the fact that one person caused the death of the other was undisputed – there was then an issue around intention, which opens up the possibility of manslaughter. In this case it is the act of killing that is disputed. It appears on facts that if you accept he killed her – which would have to be based on texts- it follows that there was intention – as the texts outlined an intention. Also I assume ‘orbiter’ is a typo. Anyway, he will appeal but it’s not the certainty people here are suggesting.
Guilty as sin in the role he played in Elains death but you’ve got to question her innocence in this whole depraved matter. According to the text messages she was far from innocent and more than likely not the victim the prosecution would have you believe. My deepest sympathies to her family. As for Graham, justice has been served for his part.
Elaine was not the only victim here. He has ruined the lives of her family, his own family and his wife’s family. Narcissistic sociopath. Has he even shown any remorse?
Incredibly tragic for Elaines family to endure the horrendous evidence given in this case. But at least today they have achieved justice for the terrible loss of Elaine.
In all fairness though, she was no saint herself and had her own weird part to play in the whole thing. He’s guilty as sin but how much of a victim was she. According to the text messages she knew full well what his intentions were and she went along with it.
Eh she’s a pretty big victim i’d say!! She lost her life just for his sadistic sexual gratification! Her texts to him explicitly stated that she did not want to be murdered. It was there in black and white in a message to him!
The foremans question to the judge along side Jerry beades bog standard house comments will go down as the most idiotic statement in Irish public life,thankfully this sick twisted monster can keeps his warped evil fantasies behind bars.
He never gave Elaine O’Hara a choice. He preyed on her. She had no one to protect her. She was very vulnerable and lonely. He took something that wasn’t his to take. It is not about lifestyle choice, which, I believe everyone is entitled to provided all parties are happy and above age. He crossed that line. I’m so sad when I hear about this poor girl and the desperation she must have felt. He is guilty of the most horrendous crime and anyone who doesn’t believe that is as guilty as him.
I can categorically tell you that is absolute rubbish. Circumstantial evidence is not inferior to direct evidence, when no alternative reasonable explanation can be found – just as in this case.
I am sure there will be an appeal as Graham Dwyer things everyone is against him, that he is right and they are wrong, that he is too clever to get stuck with prison, but I think it will fail and I also think that all of the evidence when taken together is far too strong to be credibly undermined.
Am I the only one who thinks she hung herself from a tree ? She had only just spoken of hanging herself and had the rope too. Forensics didnt find a single stab mark on any of her bones, seems bizarre to me.
Latest quarterly house price report shows that price inflation is at an eight-year high
1 min ago
1
0
The Morning Lead
In unprecedented move, Ireland's psychiatrists say CAMHS 'urgently' needs to be overhauled
7 mins ago
66
0
trump administration
White House confirms Defence Secretary accidentally texted journalist US plans to strike Yemen
Updated
1 hr ago
59.7k
120
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 160 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 110 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 142 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 112 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 38 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 34 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 133 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 59 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 88 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say