Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
IRELAND’S CURRENT and former TDs, Senators and MEPs have declared donations of €378,920 for the 2011 calendar year in documents published this evening by the public donations watchdog.
The Standards in Public Office Commission said almost half of the donations were disclosed by current Senators who were either unsuccessful candidates for last year’s Dáil election, or by former Oireachtas members candidates at the 2011 Presidential election – both of which had been disclosed in previous documents.
Just under €200,000 was donated to candidates, with Labour TDs and Senators disclosing the highest donations by far: its 27 current TDs and Senators disclosed donations totalling €83,517. President Michael D Higgins had already disclosed €121,421.53 in respect of the presidential election.
Fine Gael members disclosed donations worth a total of €56,262, while Fianna Fáil’s members disclosed donations worth a total of €32,860. Sinn Féin members disclosed €8,800 in donations between them.
The recipient of the largest number of donations was independent NUI senator Rónán Mullen, who declared donations of €18,277.96 last year, ahead of Senator David Norris whose donations outside of the presidential election tallied €17,929.98.
Independent TD for Wicklow Stephen Donnelly took in €11,652, the highest of any TD, while fellow independent Shane Ross accepted €10,274 of donations in Dublin South.
Senator Michael D’Arcy, an outgoing Fine Gael TD who lost his seat in February’s general election, topped Fine Gael’s list of individual TDs and Senators disclosing donations, declaring €9,400 in donations – largely received from companies in his native Gorey.
Alex White, a Labour TD for Dublin South, was the highest individual recipient of donors from his party, with €7,250 in donations.
None of Ireland’s 12 MEPs declared any donations above the €634.87 threshold, including Gay Mitchell, who also did not disclose any donations for his presidential election campaign.
Similarly, SIPO did not receive any statements from individuals who donated an aggregate of more than €5,078.95 to members from the same political party.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Also a integral part of the Cologne story were the illegal immigrants who abused the German women.
@Kevin Dillon: Not according to police in Cologne who described it as an ordinary New year’s celebration. The accusations only came to light in late January after being published by media following posts on Facebook and other social media platforms.
@Kevin Dillon: They seem to have no compassion for these vulnerable women that were victimised. That’s the reason the Cologne incident epitomised the issues many people have with the far left. It showed them up to be the hypocrites they are. And this report walked headfirst into this. In the era when ISIS were at the top of their power, we were letting millions of unvetted migrants into Europe whilst serious crime and terrorist attacks were being carried out by migrants and children of migrants. You’d be insane not to question this. But apparently such common sense makes you racist. It doesn’t matter that you recognise that it’s not all migrants.
After criticising Australias border stance yesterday, I get your viewpoint, but labeling all criticism about the crisis as far right is just as labeling as those that supposedly call all migrants terrorists. There is a problem, but not all came from warzones for asylum, and chanced their arm without taking the legal route. They can move if they have the paperwork done.
@neilo: Correct me if I’m wrong but I had thought one of the attacks came through the Mediterranean route. The others were first generation. But the fact that they were first generation goes to show that integration may not be working (these guys grew up in a cultural enclave in Brussels) which is a serious concern as we could have more attacks in 20/30 years from european citizens as a result of todays policy.
@neilo: yeah I agree. But the issue is how do we stop this form of terrorism and will it only get worse as a result of todays policy?
The IRA had a clear objective and peace was reached because compromise was found. With these radicals there’s no compromise, they’re ideologically against everything the west stands for. I agree destabilising the middle east gives strength to these radicals but they don’t have an express view we can meet them halfway on.
@neilo: Merkel did!! She said all the Syrians were welcome, that’s a fact! And of the 1:6 million of them who did get to Germany, only 2:9% of them are employed! That’s a fact as well.
A recent report from Greece said they had a sizable amount of Caribbean”refugees”. They got on a plane to fly to Turkey then paid smugglers to get to Greece. Get informed. Europe is full!!
@neilo: it’s not an open border policy but a policy of mass immigration (as opposed to safe zones and support in home countries/neighbouring countries). Also the policy of ferrying people who are a few miles off the coast of Libya to Europe only encourages people to make the journey, supports traffickers, and results in more tragedies occurring at sea.
@neilo: sorry I should probably be clearer. When I say policy I don’t mean an express government policy (I don’t really know what express policies are in place). I’m going off how they are operating. From what I see there is a complacency in settling millions of people without sufficient background checks from areas which are war torn and not war torn. The Dublin convention also appears to be being ignored.
To be honest I’m surprised the % of refugees from. Third world countries is not higher. But being from a third world country is not sufficient to get asylum and is totally unsustainable.
Regaridng the boats I agree it’s complicated, but the best system may be one similar to Australia as they successfully managed to stop the boats and deaths at sea.
@neilo: The thing is, if you don’t have an express ‘closed borders’ policy, it will be interpreted as ‘open borders’.
@neilo: yeah hopefully they can get some form of process set up in North Africa.
I don’t know if it’s true that the majority of applicants in Ireland or the EU are rejected and the people deported. As far as I know most applicants who are rejected stay for in excess of 10 years (in ireland anyway) while they go through appeal after appeal. Also I just had a look at http://www.asylumineurope.org and on 2017 there were 2,910 applications and 90 were rejected. However I know many of these are still pending.
I don’t even think it’s a problem in Ireland. I’m more talking about the EU as a whole and countries such as Germany and Sweden.
@neilo: thanks Neilo. Maybe it is getting better and things will be done better for all involved in the coming years.
@neilo: “and the applicants deported,as in the case in most EU countries” You must know very well that that is totally untrue.
Can we not have a sensible discussion on immigration. Not labeling those with legitimate concerns as far right and not labelling those that want us to show compassion as lefties. It is possible to want both.
@Philip Morgan: no you can’t. We’re all intolerant & racist for even wanting to have a rational discussion on such a topic. I feel a good dose of cultural enrichment is just what Dr Varadkar ordered.
@Philip Morgan: Yes let’s have that. I’m open to sensible suggestions.
What do you have in mind?
@Lou Sypher: Speak for yourself anonymous one.
I want a chat with him.
As a result of the obvious bias in favor of uncontrolled immigration. I have become extremely sceptical of stories in the media reporting on it. I suppose that makes me “far right”, so be it.
Far right AKA citizens concerned about unvetted mass immigration
Hardly ground-breaking, cutting-edge nor original research!
Thats a no brainer , If something is topical in the news it’s obvious it will become topical on twitter an example the journal during the casey debates , stories supporting casey and polls here were getting exaggerated support to what he actually got at the polls.
Plenty of alt right bots right here in the journal comments section, mostly English, attempting to give a skewed view regarding immigration to Ireland.
@European Bob: too early for leftys
anyway yeserday was dole day
poor lads and laseys need a ly in
after the beer day
@Flippermac: Why do you write your comments like they’re a poem? It’s like I’m reading Seamus Heaney if he had just suffered massive brain trauma.
@WilliamMorris: well that’s one good thing I did to day
would you like a pain killer
poor thing
@European Bob: Dont be silly ” alt right bots”. I would like to take this opportunity to congratulate the VOX party on its historic election in Spain. Democracy only works if everyones voice is heard.
@Graham Light: rubbish
Between this and their “report” on “hate speech” DCU are on a role. I don’t see science here only judgment based on their far left leanings, and that’s coming from someone on the left. If you don’t fully agree with them and have nuanced opinions on complicated topics you’re “far-right”. You just get lumped in with some lad that said “rapefugee” on Twitter. How could DCU be wrong. Their views are backed up by a report! Do you have a report?
Etat nye pravda!
Wouldn’t the far right be better off joining a union if they want to be financially better off and job security.
Ah, ‘framing’, the crime that is not a crime when we do it.
have your say