Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Mark Stedman/Photocall Ireland

Unhappy Labour backbenchers to stand by Reilly, call FF motion a 'deflection'

The Fianna Fáil/Sinn Féin-tabled motion of confidence is “politics at its most unattractive”, according to Waterford TD Ciara Conway.

ALTHOUGH LABOUR BACKBENCHERS have made their feelings on proposed Health Service Executive cuts known, many say they will vote for Minister James Reilly in any motion of confidence.

Labour Party chairman Colm Keaveney told Morning Ireland he has confidence that the Health Minister will review the €130 million in cuts “with a view of protecting the most vulnerable people in society”. The Galway East TD believes it is premature to suggest that the proposals are a “fait accompli”.

“I’m an optimist in that I am fully confident that we can resolve these matters to ensure the proposals as presented to not proceed.”

He added that he will not be supporting any Fianna Fáil motion in respect of confidence “because Minister Reilly has been elected to address the institutionalised defective system that he has inherited from the proposers of the motion”.

“I think Fianna Fáil continue to do a disservice to politics by proposing such a motion that deflects from the core issue here”.

The two main opposition parties have confirmed their intentions to table such a motion when the Dáil returns from its summer recess in two weeks’ time.

Waterford backbencher Ciara Conway echoed her party chairman’s opinions on the move by Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin.

“I think that it is a deflection of the issue,” she said. “It is politics at its most unattractive…window dressing to what is going on here.”

However, she also showed her dismay at the €130 million in cuts, announced by the HSE last week, which will impact frontline services such as Home Helps and Personal Assistants for the sick and elderly.

“What I fail to reconcile is that…it is actually more cost effective – both socially and financially – to look after people in their own home,” she said. “Why are we going after this in particular?”

Dublin South Central’s Michael Conaghan also expressed his desire for Cabinet to withdraw the latest round of cuts, stating that “unilateral decisions are not wise”.

He added that he would be “very sceptical” of the motion of confidence, describing it as “playing politics”.

Meath East’s Dominic Hannigan was more sympathetic to Reilly because of the “difficult job” is he doing at the moment.

“There is no money to spare,” he told Morning Ireland. “We can’t take money from the education sector because that has a very tight budget. We can’t take it from the social welfare because that’s got a tight budget. It is a difficult circumstance that we are in.”

“I will be voting in favour of Minister Reilly. He has a difficult job to do…let him get on with it.”

Related: Opposition parties to force Dáil vote of confidence in James Reilly>

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
66 Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds