Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
Updated at 6.30pm
JOBBRIDGE IS CLOSING to new applicants from Friday and is set to be replaced with a new programme.
Minister for Social Protection Leo Varadkar made the announcement this afternoon.
The minister said those still in the scheme will be able to finish their internships but that it is now being wound down.
A new scheme will take its place, the minister said today, which will pay people at least the minimum wage.
“Our view is JobBridge has done the job it was asked to do,” said Varadkar.
A consultation process is being set up with a view to introducing a new employment scheme for jobseekers in late-2017.
“That [scheme] will be much more focussed,” said Varadkar.
“It will be focussed on people who need work experience in order to get a foot on the employment ladder.
It will pay at the very least the net minimum wage and in addition to that it will have a training element and be limited in numbers.
Varadkar said the new scheme would likely have employers pay a contribution for being included, which he said would reduce to chances of “exploitation”.
Report
Varadkar’s announcement comes after a report found that JobBridge had served its purpose and should be replaced with the new programme.
JobBridge was set up in 2011 as an initiative to help the unemployed get work experience. The scheme had people on long term jobseeker’s benefit work as interns for a company in return for an extra €52 on top of their social welfare payment.
The scheme has come under heavy criticism in the years since it was launched, with various group and political parties calling for it to be discontinued earlier this year.
Chief among concerns raised by people was the exploitation of certain companies of the scheme, the small top up payment offered to people on the scheme and the overworking of interns.
There was also strong criticism of low-skilled positions being advertised on the site, with suggestions that companies were using the initiative to hire “free labour”.
The report launched today by Indecon International Research Economists found that the scheme had been successful in helping people return to the job market.
Over 10,500 interns who had gone through the JobBridge scheme took part in a survey for the report.
Over a quarter of those surveyed were now in employment with their JobBridge organisation, with another quarter employed in some other sector.
In total, 64.2% of people who had gone through the scheme were now employed.
Satisfaction
In terms of intern satisfaction, the responses varied under different aspects, but were positive in most cases.
70% of those surveyed agreed that their internship had given them new job skills and had provided them with an opportunity to gain quality work experience.
Six out of 10 were satisfied with the quality of the work experience they got at their internship, and over half said they were happy with the training they received, and said the scheme had enhanced their career goals.
However, over half of those surveyed were dissatisfied with the value of the JobBridge top up payment, and three out of 10 didn’t believe the scheme met their expectations.
Speaking today, Varadkar referenced some of the controversies around businesses hiring people through JobBridge, for example in roles such as deli counter staff.
“We are going to ensure that [the new scheme] is more selective as to type of work experience that is available,” he said.
I think it’s important to say that work experience of any sort is valuable for jobseekers.
A Labour Market Council report agreed with the findings of the Indecon report, accepting that JobBridge was successful in its objective of helping jobseekers secure paid employment.
With reporting from Cliodhna Russell
Well we can all sleep peacefully now that that’s sorted.
Not the best comparison really considering he retorted with a figure for the domestic market rather than all operated markets combined.
The greed of the music companies is line one endless stream. The artists complaints are a joke. Plays on Spotify are like having your ads paid for
Streams on Spotify are a pittance and a poor source of income for musicians. More power to her if she wants to remove her music from Spotify. She clearly doesn’t need it as she’s by far the best selling artist this year.
Taylor Swift and her record company are just in it for the prestige of record breaking sales and the history books, not people who listen to the music. Nowhere is questioned what is better for the consumer (or fans as they used to be known)?
Spotify has obviously not cannibalised the album buying public, as her album has one of the highest number of record sales, which is in addition to any income from streaming and video services.. Spotify replaces the radio, not albums sales, and it gives people to opportunity to spend a small amount to listen (not own) music for a low cost. But not low enough that If all you wanted to listen to was taylor swift, then you could buy her back catalogue for less than a few months of spotify.
What the record company don’t get is that the spotify income, small as it is compared to if everyone who listened to a track bought the album instead, is a top up from people who would just download it from a torrent, or listen to it on the radio. It is never about being paid for their work, as she has the highest income per effort in the world, but instead just making sure parents pay what a record company exec told her each fan was worth.
She is probably the most popular pop artist out there at the moment and she would only make €400k/year on Spotify? Most artists must only be making pennies on it
I like her songs.
don’t know why. but her and her songs really annoy me, even more than Cheryl cole
Oooooh no, she only earned €398,000 in the last 12 months. Boo focking Hoo.
Taylor Swift and music in the same sentence . . . ? Jaysus.
Nope.
Maybe?
Depends!
On?
have your say