Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

File photo from January 2009 of businessman Denis O'Brien. Julien Behal/PA Wire

Justice Moriarty had "Stockholm syndrome", says Denis O'Brien

Businessman claims judge overseeing payments to politicians tribunal and awarding of Esat Digifone licence identified too strongly with prosecuting council.

BUSINESSMAN DENIS O’BRIEN has claimed Justice Moriarty suffered from Stockholm syndrome in identifying with certain people in his Tribunal judgment – particularly prosecutor Jerry Healy.

Stockholm syndrome is a term used to describe how kidnapping victims can identify sympathetically with their kidnappers.

Published earlier this week, the Moriarty Tribunal’s report criticised TD Michael Lowry’s role in the awarding of a mobile phone licence to O’Brien’s Esat Digifone in 1996 and said O’Brien had made payments to Lowry.

“It’s all hearsay, it’s gossip, innuendo,” he said of the report.

In an interview with RTÉ’s Pat Kenny this morning, O’Brien claimed that Justice Moriarty wasn’t “up to the job” and that he hadn’t written the whole report; instead, he suggested that Jerry Healey SC contributed largely to the publication.

“If you look stylistically at the report and the language, it’s not a judge’s language,” he claimed.

O’Brien criticised Healy’s presence as the lead prosecutor in the Tribunal proceedings, saying he earned €10m from his work, and suggested Healy had seemed biased against Esat Digifone from the beginning of proceedings.

He said he’s not concerned that the report is being sent to the DPP as the DPP will make up their own mind about its findings.

O’Brien suggested people read John Water’s piece on the Tribunal in today’s Irish Times because “he got it in one”. Water’s piece, called 2,349, 14 years and a whole lot of idle gossip, says that the “Moriarty verdict is less a judgment and more like the opening statement in the court of public opinion, a hearing that will continue for some time”.

The Tribunal may seek to recoup some of its multi-million costs by pursuing Lowry and O’Brien.

Read Denis O’Brien’s statement reacting to the Moriarty Tribunal report >

Read: Tribunal labels Lowry an “insidious and pervasive influence” on Esat bidding process >

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
25 Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds