Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Kathy Sinnott Photocall Ireland

Sinnott accused of engaging in 'hysterical hyperbole' over referendum

The former MEP Kathy Sinnott has been criticised by a Fine Gael TD for her opposition to the children’s referendum but Sinnott has hit back saying that Jim Daly has not done his homework.

FINE GAEL TD Jim Daly has said that comments by former MEP Kathy Sinnott in relation to the children’s referendum are disingenuous and has accused her of engaging in “hysterical hyperbole”.

He was speaking following claims by Sinnott that if the referendum is passed in November it will “lock in” the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) to the Irish Constitution.

However, Sinnott stood by this claim saying that it is “absolutely true” and accused Daly of having not “done his homework” on the proposed amendment which proposes to enshrine the rights of the child in the Constitution.

“He is absolutely wrong,” she told TheJournal.ie.

In a statement yesterday the Cork South West deputy said that there is “absolutely no reference either implicit or explicit” to the UNCRC in the wording of the proposed amendment to the Constitution.

He said: “I have challenged Ms Sinnott to engage in a more honest debate on the upcoming referendum without resorting to hysterical hyperbole which is unrelated to the substance of this debate.

“Kathy Sinnott is introducing false and misleading arguments which are clearly not involved in this referendum. The public deserve to have the facts of the matter presented to them in the debate over the Children’s Referendum.

“What this Referendum will do is recognise children’s rights individually and provide them with certain protections from the State,” he insisted.

But Sinnott, who is advocating a No vote on 10 November, said that passing the amendment would ratify the UNCRC and with it would mean that unelected officials at the EU and the UN would be allowed to rewrite Irish law.

“The lead principle of it (the UNCRC) is the best interests of the child be determined by the State,” she said. “In the natural order, the parents decide the best interests of the child”.

Sinnott also said that there were a “huge amount of people waking up” to the dangers of the proposed amendment.

“People who are are aware (of its repercussions) are very worried. I am getting phone calls all the time now,” she said. ”Most people don’t know what it’s about. If they did, they would be very concerned.”

Read: Experts weigh in on Children’s Referendum

Read: The wording for children’s referendum

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Author
Hugh O'Connell
View 42 comments
Close
42 Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds