Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

ECtHR via Shutterstock

Tissue from car crash victim used without consent to create implants

A Latvian woman has won her case for inhuman treatment at the European Court of Human Rights after the procedure was carried out on her husband.

A WOMAN HAS won her case against Latvia for inhuman treatment after tissue from the body of her deceased husband was used to create bio-implants — without her knowledge.

An investigation in 2008 into the removal of tissues and organs at morgues found this procedure had been carried out on almost 500 bodies.

“In exchange for the supply of tissue to the company in Germany, the Forensic Centre had organised the purchase of different medical equipment, instruments, technology and computers for medical institutions in Latvia,” a ruling from the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) read.

Dzintra Elberte’s husband was killed in a car crash in 2001, and during the course of an autopsy tissue was removed from his body in a State-approved agreement.

Elberte discovered this two years later.

Following the 2008 investigation, Lativan law was changed, allowing for relatives to object to the removal of the deceased person’s organs and tissue. There was no legal obligation to inform relatives of this procedure – a system of presumed consent.

The ECtHR ruled there had been a violation of the right for respect to private and family life.

The verdict on inhuman treatment found that many international guidelines on transplant procedures were designed to ”protect the dignity, identity and integrity of ‘everyone’ who had been born, whether now living or dead”.

“The Court stressed that respect for human dignity formed part of the very essence of the European Convention. Consequently, the suffering caused to Ms Elberte had undoubtedly amounted to degrading treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention,” it read.

She was awarded the sum of €16,000, and €500 for costs and expenses.

Read: Paedophile told by court that castration was not a punishment >

More: Journalist wins case against Iceland over report on addiction centre sex abuse >

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Author
Nicky Ryan
View 9 comments
Close
9 Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds