Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
BARACK OBAMA HAS won a second term as President of the United States, beating former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney in a hotly contested election.
All major US television networks called the crucial state of Ohio for Obama just after 4am on Wednesday morning, giving the incumbent 274 electoral votes – well clear of the 270 needed to claim victory.
Speaking to Prime Time’s Richard Crowley, reporting from Washington, Washington Post columnist Colbert King says the result will be down to the wire – commenting: “We’re not going to have a landslide tonight.”
Frank Sesno, Director of the School of Media and Public Affairs at The George Washington University, said Obama’s chances had been permanently dented by his “disastrous” first debate with Romney – and that the incumbent “never recovered” from it.
6 Nov 2012
10:25PM
So what if Romney were to win? King and Sesno are split on whether he would take a ‘centrist’ or right-wing position as president. “It may not be possible for Romney to move to middle and stay there,” King points out.
Meanwhile, former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright tells Crowley she believes it’s essential to keep swing state Virginia ‘blue’ for an Obama victory.
6 Nov 2012
10:33PM
King and Sesno say the economy is still the “main concern” for US voters – and the preliminary results of an exit poll conducted for The Associated Press backs them up, with 6 in 10 voters putting this at the top of their agenda.
Only one quarter of those surveyed think they’re better off than they were four years ago, when Obama took the reins.
6 Nov 2012
10:50PM
Anyone will tell you that the electoral college, the system by which the US president is elected, is ridiculously complicated – and they’re completely right about that.
But it all really boils down to this: there are a total of 538 electors (or electoral college votes) and thefirst candidate to reach 270 electoral college votes wins the presidency. Boom.
Keep your eye on the swing states, which will give the best indication of which way this race is heading – namely: Colorado (9 electoral votes), Florida (29), Iowa, (6), Michigan (16) Nevada (6), New Hampshire (4), North Carolina (15), Ohio (18), Pennsylvania (20), Virginia (13), Wisconsin (10).
6 Nov 2012
11:10PM
There’s under one hour to go before the first state closes its polls, but voting doesn’t end until 6am… So, to stop you from twiddling your thumbs, Sinead O’Carroll has put together a list of things to do while the American’s are casting their ballots.
Why not play the New York Times’ 512 Paths to the White House graphic, which provides the various paths-to-victory available to either candidate if they win in one of the more competitive states.
He knows it’s close. A last-minute appeal from the sitting president:
6 Nov 2012
11:25PM
The Drudge Report has some interesting exit poll info – reporting that it looks like Romney will take North Carolina and Florida. Obama, meanwhile, could be set to take New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Miami and Nevada, according to the polls.
It’s apparently still a toss up in Ohio, Virginia, Colorado and Iowa.
A whole lot hinges on Ohio – but that doesn’t stop people asking…
6 Nov 2012
11:54PM
Sky News airs Romney interview admitting that he’s finished writing his victory speech.
He then go all Wizard of Oz on us:
I think that I’m going to win, intellectually, and I feel it as well.
Mitt has a brain AND a heart.
6 Nov 2012
11:56PM
NBC exit poll: 46 per cent believe US is going in the right direction, 52 per cent think it’s on the ‘wrong track’…
6 Nov 2012
11:59PM
IT’S ALMOST TIME… polls close soon in Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, South Carolina, Vermont and Virginia.
7 Nov 2012
12:03AM
NBC projections
Virginia: too close to call (for now)
Indiana: (11) Romney
Kentucky: (8) Romney
South Carolina: (9) too early to call
Vermont: (3) Obama
Georgia: (16) too early to call
7 Nov 2012
12:12AM
Fox News calls Georgia for Romney….
7 Nov 2012
12:15AM
Virginia and Ohio are the ones to watch here – it’s worth noting that Obama took a good chunk of the female and younger vote in Virginia.
7 Nov 2012
12:20AM
Vigo County, Indiana, has correctly predicted the result every time since the mid-1940s and all but twice in the last 125 years.
CNN says it’s 49-49.
7 Nov 2012
12:25AM
Exit polls from CNN indicate the Latino electorate account for nearly 10 per cent of the vote, after turning out in a double -digit percentage across the nation for the first time.
Polls to close shortly in: Alabama, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee
Maybe so… but then what excuse would we have to do maths in the early hours of the morning?
7 Nov 2012
1:30AM
Storm-ravaged New Jersey called for Obama by two networks.
7 Nov 2012
1:34AM
Two networks call the once-Democratic state of Arkansas for Romney. Native Bill Clinton won’t be best pleased.
7 Nov 2012
1:38AM
Votes on Columbus, in Franklin County, and Cincinnati seen as clinchers for which way Ohio state will swing.
7 Nov 2012
1:46AM
Romney feels his campaign has “put it all on the field”, “left nothing in the locker room”, “fought to the very end”, and other big, manly metaphors – VIDEO via the Guardian.
Some 15 per cent of voters told NBC that Obama’s response to Sandy was important in their vote and 70 per cent of those said it led them to vote Obama – while 30 per cent said it made them support Romney.
Tricia Burke walks over debris which washed up onto her property in the wake of superstorm Sandy, Thursday, Nov. 1, 2012, in Brick, N.J. (AP Photo/Julio Cortez)
7 Nov 2012
2:04AM
Here were go again:
Kansas (6): Romney
Nebraska (5): Romney
South Dakota (3): Romney
Texas (38): Romney
Colorado (9): too early to call
Minnesota (10): too early to call
Wisconsin (10): too early to call
New York (29): Obama
Michigan (16): Obama
Louisiana (8): Romney
Kansas (6): Romney
New Mexico (5): Obama
North Dakota (3): Romney
Wyoming (3): Romney
Arizona (11): too early to call
7 Nov 2012
2:06AM
The auto bailout seems to have gone down well with voters in Michigan – does this spell good news for Obama in the all-important state of Ohio?
7 Nov 2012
2:08AM
Obama takes New Jersey (14)
7 Nov 2012
2:13AM
Minnesota is predicted to support Obama, having voted Democrat solidly since 2000 – with MBC, CBS, CNN, the New York Times, Real Clear Politcs and the BBC all expecting the incumbent to win in that state.
Colorado is a wild-card, having voted Republican in 2000 and 2004, but switching to Democrat last election.
Wisconsin has supported Democratic candidates in the past three presidential elections – even so, it’s predicted to be a toss-up there.
Finally, Arizona, is predicted to go with Romney.
7 Nov 2012
2:16AM
A great stat by NBC: with almost 6.8 million votes counted and 78 per cent of the precincts reporting Romney leads by … 193 votes.
We hope you like John Boehner, because he will remain the Speaker of the House for at least the next two years. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
7 Nov 2012
2:52AM
Speaking from Obama HQ in Chicago Debbie Wasserman Schultz – US Representative for Florida’s 20th congressional district – says she thinks they might have an early night.
7 Nov 2012
2:53AM
Prediction that Obama will take New Hampshire – where Romney has (one) home. Not good news for the Republicans.
Ted Kennedy’s old Senate seat is back in the hands of the Democrats – and there’s another new generation of Kennedys in Congress – as Elizabeth Warren takes Scott Brown’s seat.
Elizabeth Warren, left, emerges from the polling booth as she votes in Cambridge, Mass. on Election Day, Tuesday, Nov. 6, 2012. (AP Photo/Josh Reynolds)
It’s still too close to call in Florida but Obama is shading it with over 7.4 million votes counted – around 84 per cent of the total. The president now leads by just a few thousand votes.
7 Nov 2012
3:37AM
Arizona (11) called for Romney (John McCain’s home state) so no surprises there.
Meanwhile, CBS News is projecting Minnesota for Obama…
Republican candidate for Wisconsin’s U.S. Senate seat, former Gov. Tommy Thompson, left, participates in a debate against Democratic candidate U.S. Rep. Tammy Baldwin at Marquette University Friday, Oct. 26, 2012, in Milwaukee. (AP Photo/Jeffrey Phelps)
In the next few minutes, polls will close in California, Hawaii, Idaho, Oregon, Washington. None of these are swing states but the 55 electoral votes of California, predicted to go to Obama, will significantly boost his electoral tally.
Obama is pitched to take Hawaii (4), Oregon (7) and Washington (12) too – while Romney is expected to take Idaho (4)and North Dakota (3).
Ok, that’s all folks. We’ll be bringing you the speeches and analysis later this morning and throughout the day.
Thanks for all the tweets and comments and – most importantly – congratulations to President Barack Obama!
Advertisement
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
I’m glad you raised that point Sean. Mitt is a shortened version of mitten. A glove. When Mitt was asked to name his son, he chose the name Tagg. It sounds similar to name tag. Both names seem to objectivy a person, there are some people within society that view others as objects. These names seem to add evidence to this theory.
I’ve been sucked in – A lot of indications were that there might be 1 or several weeks of legal challenges (which could still happen) but I’ve been totally sucked in now!
The worst part is so would I. I mean Romney believes in magic underpants for feck sake and any person who believes that and who could be put in such a position of power…… that frightens the bejosephsmith out of me.
@Joe, it only sounds stupid because there’s not a lot of them in Ireland. If there was a lot of any particular group around you you’d not think it was stupid.
It is extremely hard to understand that someone like Mitt is actually in with a chance of clinching this. The American electorate should know well he is a compulsive liar among other things.
Then again, I’m sure an American looking at Ireland last year would have found it hard to understand how we voted Fine Gael into power! Seems there’s a lot of idiots in both nations. Hopefully they don’t form the voting majority across the Atlantic this time though!
To be fair, most Irish hope for Obama, probably mostly because we feel we could actually have a pint with him and curse at him in the way we do to all our pals…..
The primary thing going on is about economy – people talk about other things that will separate this vote and yes, there are other things but for the most part, economy is the one that actually swings it.
The real question about the economy is will people say that Obama has left it in sh*t or will they say that he inherited it that way from Bush? Will people realise that much of Obama’s promise for change hasn’t come to fruition not because he hasn’t followed through but because republicans have blocked him at every turn?
Obama won the in Guam. They don’t have any electoral college votes but have correctly picked the winner since 1984. Will be interesting to see if they’re right this time.
There’s a saying in presidential elections -’Iowa picks corn while Ohio picks presidents’, the adage is true as no president in history has ever become president without winning Ohio. It is the bellwether of the entire US, once it falls to Obama then the game is up.
This election is over, Obama has already won it. I say that as the most accurate method in political science at predictiing a Presidential race (Lichtman’s Keys to the White House) had already called this election for Obama as early as July 2010.
Professor Lichtman has never been wrong on predicting a future president and it is highly unlikely this election will be the first occasion. He wrote in July 2010 that Obama met most of his criteria on governing over the last 4 years and would therefore retain the White House. For any politicos out there who like to beat the bookies I can highly recommend following this guy- his system has won me money on every presidential election since 2000 and given Obama’s higher polling numbers in 7 out of 9 swing states I expect tonight to be no different from his previous form
what I dont get is if the experts say this is too close to call, why has a bookies paid out on Obama winning already and all bookies have Obama at such short odds to win for the last few weeks, they can’t surely have their info so wrong.
The bookies will turn out to be right- studies have shown that bookies odds are a better and more accurate predictor of a presidential race than opinion polls are. Opinion polls ask ‘who do you intend to vote for’ whereas bookies odds ask ‘who do you think is going to win’. People who bet on politics do so with their head, people who answer opinion polls do so with their heart and then they might not even bother to vote on the day. When you introduce the financial gain incentive to get it right is much higher.
And as the bookies odds having been calling this election for Obama for several weeks now it is clear they’ve done their sums in the swing states an it is like a commentator said earlier “Obama has the math, Romney has the myth”
What bookies? Masters of stunt marketing, Paddy Power? Bookies are bookies for a reason. Yes, Obama is probably going to win but either way it doesn’t matter. If Obama wins- free marketing for two days and bets are payed. If Obama loses Paddy Power pay for their marketing and punters think “I love Paddy Power, they’re idiots and give away free money, let’s bet there”
Plus some punters will throw a few quid at Romney winning just to hope they can beat the bookies both ways. It’s a kind of reverse psychology thing there.
My apologies for repeating myself, but Romney is not only a Mormon, but a Mormon bishop as well. Imagine a president of the USA being a bishop. Or, look at it another way, imagine a bishop becoming a president. I can’t quite articulate my misgivings, but then do I really have to?.
Do you want to shred the bit in the 1st amendment about freedom of speech too Michael?
No problem with people practicing their religion personally though I do think it’s misguided. Unfortunately if you want to call in the 1st, you have to accept all that it entails.
Calling in what you want as it suits your argument? Typical Romney supporter….
If you care about foreign policy, the NDAA, the ‘repeal the 4th amendment’ (Patriot Act), national debt, interventionism, freedom, against drone strikes, auditing the federal reserve and following the constitution by actually declaring war through congress, you vote for….
Why does the media constantly say that the ‘electoral college system is “very complicated”‘? This drives me mad, it’s as simple as shit! All you need to understand it is basic addition arithmetic, or ‘math’…
Everyone should watch the election explainer videos on YouTube by CGPGrey , he explains the electoral college (and how you can ‘technically’ win with just 22% of the populations vote) .. http://youtu.be/7wC42HgLA4k . He also explains what happens in the case of a tie
Obama posted on Reddit again an hour ago, by the way:
“I want to thank you all again for the reception you gave me in August for my AMA. Good questions. Definitely not bad.
I’m checking in because polls will start closing in this election in just a few hours, and I need you to vote.
Millions of Americans have stepped up in support of this campaign over the last 19 months, and today we decide what the next four years look like — but only if we show up.
I ask that you go out there and cast your vote, whatever your political persuasion.
What a relief. Thanks Jen+ Gavan. Was worried to see 162:162 at 04:00. This is good news. Go on Obama and hope they get rid of the republicans in two years time to really implement change. Phew
Re Fun Fact: Republicans haven’t won a US presidential election without a Bush or Nixon on ticket since 1928.
Wasn’t Gerald Ford a Republican President in the 70s and I don’t think his VP was either a Bush or Nixon
Don't forget! The clocks go forward by an hour tonight
9 mins ago
277
5
ekrem imamoglu
Thousands take to streets of Istanbul to protest over mayor’s arrest
19 mins ago
295
1
arctic reception
JD Vance says US take over of Greenland ‘makes sense’ during scaled back visit
Updated
22 hrs ago
56.5k
150
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 161 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 110 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 143 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 113 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 39 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 35 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 134 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 61 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 88 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say