Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
Mary Hanafin
Former ministers to get pension boost, but one thinks the country "isn't ready" yet
Mary Hanafin has said former ministers should be the “very last” people to get an increase.
12.38pm, 5 Jul 2015
26.7k
172
Laura Hutton / Photocall Ireland
Laura Hutton / Photocall Ireland / Photocall Ireland
MARY HANAFIN HAS warned against increasing the pensions of former government ministers, saying that the economy “isn’t ready” yet.
The former Fianna Fáil education minister and now councillor described the pensions as “very generous”.
Speaking to The Marian Finucane Show on RTÉ Radio 1, Hanafin said:
“I think we should be the very last people, the very last, to get any kind of an increase.”
I don’t think the country is right, or the economy is right yet, to be paying us or the very big pensioners extra money.
The Sunday Times reports today that under the recently agreed public sector pay deal, former government ministers are in line to receive a pension increase.
The paper details that the maximum increase is in the region of €1,680. For example, former taoiseach Brian Cowen’s pension will increase from around €134,000 €136,000.
Advertisement
The Department has defended the increases, with a spokesperson telling the paper that the increases are weighted towards civil servants at the other end of the pay scale.
Hanafin said that in her own situation, she doesn’t take an allowance or expenses from the Dún Laoghaire–Rathdown council, worth roughly €30,000 together.
Mary Hanafin with Brian Cowen (left) and the late Brian Lenihan (right), pictured here in March 2010. Sasko Lazarov / Photocall Ireland
Sasko Lazarov / Photocall Ireland / Photocall Ireland
Speaking to the same programme, Hanafin also defended the Fianna Fáil government’s actions during the financial crisis.
She said the regulator, the Central Bank, and the politicians were each left to look after their own areas, but she doesn’t think this “hands-off approach” is appropriate now.
Former finance ministers Brian Cowen and Charlie McCreevy both appeared before the banking inquiry last week.
Quoting opinion and colour writers, including TD Shane Ross, Hanafin said the inquiry so far has been aimed at ‘nailing Fianna Fáil to the cross’.
“That just hasn’t happened yet,” she said, noting Ross’s suggestion that it could boomerang and negatively affect the current Government.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
what about the old age pensioners.they were robbed blind by this government what with the household charge and demands for water charges.it leaves them with very little.the last thing we need is former government ministers getting more money when the government says no to OAPsthis needs a reality check and come down to the OAPs level.cuts after cuts where will it end.
Leaches as if they don’t get enough to live on already. something seriously wrong with our society people the rich get richer and the rest can go be fxxked down the line this is going to lead to serious and I mean serious problems it’s happening as we speak but will get bigger until it all goes to shxt.
This is one of the reasons there’s such a deep seated hatred of politicians in this country. They contributed handsomely to the utter wrecking of this country.. No consequences for them to their actions and they walk off with these kind of vulgar sized pensions on my the absolute and genuine belief that they are worth every penny of it…said it before..they are 20 years behind the curve of public disgust toward them.
I guess that I’ll get a shower of red thumbs for this but…. ah, what the hell!
Did the public-sector unions really think that TDs and senators wouldn’t get increases in salaries and pensions under the old benchmarking process and the upcoming deal? Members of the Oireachtas are part of the public sector, whether we like it or not. If you don’t like your TD then give your first preference to a different candidate in the next general election.
Ciaran…it doesn’t matter who I vote for..a politicians pay is the same no matter who receives it. No matter what anyone says its deeply disturbing that these people are rewarded to this level given their incompetence at their jobs.
Unlike many public-sector workers, TDs don’t have job security – they have to go before the people every five years to persuade people to vote for them.
Ciaran, in those 5 years they can save their salary and be made for life , mortgages paid in full etc. Do you honestly think that ministers pay a penny for going for dinner and drinks, claim everything from petrol to scratching their arses on expenses and then finish off on a generous pension for life. I wouldn’t mind it
Elected representatives should be on the average industrial wage so that they feel every austerity measure they advocate & legislate for. It really is that simple.
who needs job security with these pensions? as for persuading people to vote for them..they could comfortably live on half of what they get but their greedy snouts are always at the trough and I didn’t sanction these perks and pay rises they’re always out for no 1 …themselves!!!! ….get a grip a stupid statement!!!
Ciaran…they don’t need job security given what they receive in pay and pensions. A politician who has bled the country for any period of time will probably find him/herself on the board of some company in the private sector or the public sector. Whatever you cut it these parasites have their situation sown up.
Yes Ciaran you hit the nail on the head the country is crying out for change .I for one will not be voting for the parties that since the foundation of the state have lined their pockets at the expense of every body else. Very easy to introduce a water tax overnight so I can’t see any reason not to introduce a tax on politicians pensions or at least make sure they don’t get paid them till they are dead. It seems fair to me anyway
@ Tony….almost everyone who works for a living have to have SOME form of a qualification bet a sorgeon, solicitor, plumber, bus driver, receptionist, or gets on the job training the TD on the other hand needs absolutely no qualification to get the job. Some are highly qualified to do other jobs, the reason there are so many teachers in the Dail are two fold plenty of free time to attend local functions (most finish at 3 to 4 pm and of course they are used to standing in front of an “audience” even if that is teaching kids the 12 times tables. Hence they end up chairing local meetings and groups!!!
Absolutely, here we go again gravy train rolls into town!!!
Our debt stands at over 100% of GDP and these clowns want a payrise – never – not till we have repaid our debt fully and once again have control of our sovereignty -and not have our budget debated and approved in the bundestag !
Until then they are just lackies and should be paid accordingly – and next party in power should have that written into the constitution via a referendum.
I seriously cannot believe this a real thing. How in the living F**K did somebody negotiate a pension increase for former ministers? Irish children are literally starving. Starving. What in the holy hell is going on?
If Irish children are starving then it’s because they have parents who are too lazy to cook for them or put the desire for alcohol, cigarettes or illegal drugs before the welfare of their children.
If you can’t afford to be a parent, don’t become a parent.
I’m giving the government the presumption of innocence with regard to its policies. Why don’t these parents take responsibility instead of blaming the government for their problems?
It’s obvious that many children are not eating properly because of the obesity crisis or because some parents are addicts or are too lazy to cook healthy food for them. If these parents cannot afford to bring up their children then they shouldn’t have become parents in the first place. Do you not think that personal responsibility is important?
But do the circumstances of the families referred to in the articles that you have linked constitute real poverty, i.e. as in Syria or sub-Saharan Africa? What is referred to as relative poverty isn’t necessarily real poverty.
What can I say, clearly I forgot to presume the innocence of governmental policy! I also forgot to presume that all hungry children had alcoholic drug addicted lazy parents.
Not all parents of hungry Irish children are addicts. Some are just too lazy to cook. Why people who seem unable to afford to bring up children become parents I honestly don’t know.
Okay; so if people living in poverty aren’t at the level of Sub-Saharan Africa or Syria, countries that have been ravaged by colonialism, disease, famine, drought and war, they’re not poor?
How are these children living in poverty in Ireland not victims of government policy, by the way? I gave that one a miss the first time around but I have to ask, given that you’re willing to “give government policy the benefit of the doubt”?
“The best small country in the world to do business in” that can’t even look after it’s own future generation, leaving 100K+ in poverty? How can you stand over that?
Also, yes, I’m all for personal responsibility but not everyone’s perfect, people make mistakes, no contraception is 100% foolproof, accidental and unintentional pregnancies happen; have done so in the past and will probably always happen.
To be honest with you man, I’m gonna leave it here with you. I gotta work soon and I’m go to get the first half of the hurling in before I leave. Frankly, you’re a bit of a callous tw@t really and I can’t be bothered dealing with you further.
Yeah everything that vin said. You’re happy to give the government the benefit of the doubt but not parents who’ve fallen on hard times. If people have made mistakes, they are paying for them now aren’t they. But not the likes of Harney or Aherne, no, they are actually going to get a top up! If you can’t see the gross social injustice in that you’re either callous in the extreme or wilfully stupid. Either way, you’re not worth my time.
how about some were parents when they lost their jobs and the government have put so much pressure on them with taxes and charges they can no longer afford to feed their children
So because things aren’t as bad as the 1950s under Protectionism and gross economic mismanagement, the thumb of the Church and the comely maidens dancing at the crossroads that means people aren’t poor? It’s not even me you’re arguing with at this stage, it’s the Central Statistics Office but you definitely know best anyway. Myopic gob$hite.
The CSO didn’t look into the issue of whether or not some parents are making the right decision with regard to their children. Lone parents are still getting financial support from the State, it’s just not as much as it used to be.
I vehemently reject the accusation that you and Jenny have made that I am callous – or myopic.
I understand cases where one unplanned pregnancy takes place but two, three or four unplanned pregnancies?! That is carelessness.
Believe me, I’m not one of those Katie Hopkins-type individuals.
Those parents still get financial support form the State, i.e. social welfare. If they are stuck with a mortgage upon losing their jobs, then they can move to smaller accommodation and get their debts wiped by having themselves declared bankrupt. In Ireland, there’s no such thing as being unable to feed your children, no matter what your difficulties are.
Ciarán, the CSO gives the figures. That is the data. You are just making baseless claims to account for the data, maybe based on your own anecdotal evidence. Just because you may have seen parents mismanage things, doesn’t mean that you have cracked the case.
Or do you have actual evidence to support your claim?
Nobody is being punished. Social welfare is still there for the buying of food and drinking water. The single parents who I know have relatives who love them and support them.
“Single parents WHO I KNOW”.
The capitalised element of that sentence is where the fault truly lies. Your claims are based purely on anecdotal evidence; which doesn’t not stand up to data as collected by the CSO
€188 seems like a grand amount for someone who’s unemployed but not so when you factor in the cost rent, food and bills. And please, don’t start with rent allowance and medical cards; not everyone gets these. In terms of rent allowance you have to live somewhere within the threshold which varies from county to county. In my local area you have to be paying no more than €520 per month to qualify for it; let me assure you that you wouldn’t get anywhere for less than €550 and that €30 extra means you’re entitled to nothing in terms of rent allowance.
You seriously need to look beyond what you see yourself. That’s why I call you myopic; as in suffering from tunnel vision, aware only of what you see yourself. Ireland is a vastly unequal country. Just because we aren’t at the level of Sub-Saharan Africa in terms of poverty and deprivation doesn’t make this fact any less true.
I don’t deny that cuts to social welfare have caused difficulties to ordinary people but, in fairness, the cuts that have taken place here are still smaller than those that have taken place in Greece (I guess that sub-Saharan Africa wasn’t a good example to use for making a contrast).
Are there still cases of unmarried mothers being disowned by their parents in Ireland? I acknowledge that I can’t rule out the possibility but there’s no evidence that it takes place.
Well, Bertie was Taoiseach for a long time because many of us voted for his party time and time again. We all knew that his government had dodgy policies, e.g. not reforming the health service after the formation of the HSE.
@ciaran even worse than that people elected ff back into power when some of them got locked up for dodgy dealings we are a terrible stupid people with a pencil and a ballot paper.
That means Cowen’s pension is worth approx €3.4 million…i.e. That’s how much it would cost for a normal private sector individual to buy the equivalent pension. This country’s political system is a joke… Really hope this new alliance “party” make some radical changes.
So the average working people continue to struggle and the people in charge and responsible for the depression of the last 5 years get a bump to their already inflated pension? It’s this kind of crap that lead to the recession in the first place. When is someone going to right these wrongs? We need to stand up for ourselves and stop these practices. The worst value for money in this country is the service we receive from our ministers.
Political pensions have to become an election issue..keep it to the front.
I know the overall amount compared to tax take is small..but its just the obscenity of massive lump sums..step down money..multiple pensions from the same pot..all paid for by taxpayers who are screwed by a myriad of direct and indirect taxes..I know SF promised to reduce ministers pay by 40% but the overall pay and expenses and pensions has to change.
Political pensions are on the exact same conditions as civil servant/state employees.It’s just political pensions get published. I’m sure if we started publishing the individual names of local teachers/council workers lump sums and pensions we’d get similar uproar.
I’m sick and tired of hearing all the excuses politions give for landing the people here with a disaster that’s going to follow us for generations unless this debt is dropped, and if anyone believes hanifan is talking for anyone other than herself then they’re deluded. we have some strange obsession with not holding the gov’t accountable for any of their actions, they’re dead wood as far as I’m concerned, to quote how they view us, low hanging fruit. that’s what you are to them.
So this week we saw thousands of lone parents losing much needed cash from their weekly payments and in the same week we hear that firmer ministers are due to get a pension rise? How could this ever be justified? Corrupt, self serving, out of touch, some of the words that come to mind here.
And this come after the most insincere apology I ever seen from that traitor cowen. If there was a shred of remorse in his bones not only would he turn down this increase but he also return his present pension.
He also mumbled and fidgeted his way through the anglo questions, answering in a near whisper while staring at the desk in front of him, I’m no body language expert but he did look as if he feels the weight of that particular issue.
I’ll vote for and fully support any party or group who pledges to cut current and former politicans pensions by at least 50 percent after the next election, and sticks to persuing reversing what is a dispicable act from what are essentially a very poor performing bunch of politicians.
Any member of government past or present that defends this or accepts it whilst we have 1/3 of the country’s children in some form of poverty should be taken out and shot. ( NEVER ELECTED AGAIN)
Cue lots of keyboard outrage but no willingness to demonstrate , we have been in austerity Ireland since 2008 and the only people to get off their holes to fight back are the water protesters, suck it up folks pay that USC and sit at home whining , these politicians are laughing up their sleeves at paddy.
mary love have you no morals to return to politics after being a leading light in the cabinet which distroyed this country keep your head down and enjoy your immoral pensions.
this government are definitely a vile disgusting greedy corrupt shower of animals , it’s sad special needs assistance cut ,a &e closing around the country , low gardai numbers , etc etc but just enough to give these pigs a rise
the correct response mary is that tds are on ridiculously extravagant pensions for making an absolute shambles of the country. they should be given back to the taxpayer
Gene Kerrigan highlights a major part of the problem here but for a different reason:
“Nothing compelled his fellow politicians, the media or his party to ignore the fact that something bizarre had happened. But that’s what they did – and are still doing.”
I don’t think theres any law preventing her and anyone else who feels strongly about it from giving the money back, or indeed giving it to a worthy cause.
We should scrap pensions for politicians, it would encourage them to get a job………..sorry that script was written for single parent families and those struggling to survive.
Hahaha not surprised. Two sides same coin fg ff lab. People are actually going to come on here and defend it to. Again the country is in depression and not recession and these lot want to shoulder the people with more debt
That must be were they are planning to get the money from the cuts to single mother payment the water and the cuts to the under 25 payment.
What an shameful present government we have in fg and labour. They really show their true colours, self serving parasites. As it is this current government that’s allowing these payrises. As hospitals are at breaking point , special needs cut all over the country. Along with numerous other cuts that have affected many. They decided they and former politicians who have brought this country to its knees and destroyed it deserve a payrise. It really boggles the mind what kind of mindset is running the country. Think we know . those that serve anyone but the Irish people. Always said I would never vote ff and now will gladly add fg and labour to that list.
People should remember that before Hannifin left office she increased the retirement age for us normal folk to 68,As for the pension top up it is an absolute disgrace these people are getting pensions nearly 4/5 times the average industrial wage.
They live of expenses while stuffing their bank accounts with their wage,I have never heard of a former TD/Minister broke.
Sure you just have to look at Noonan &frank 40 houses fahy 2 school teachers who became TD/Ministers,Would they be able to have such a big property portfolio as school teachers.
Read Howlin trying to justify it saying there were deductions made under emergency legislation, and they had to be reversed. He claims that for that reason they could do nothing about it…seems there’s no problem with emergency legislation when it suits? surely a slight tweaking would stop these increases if they really wanted.
just makes me so angry, frustrated, helpless, They just don’t give a flying fukk, stuffing their pockets while taking away the loan parent’s allowance in the same week. Father Ted couldn’t make it up.
What tiger are you talking about you idiot? This country is drowning in debt and you think this is positive! Here’s another reson to vote out these traitors!
The average nurse on €40k will get the same or less of an increase as a politician on pension and who said work work should pay. A bad deal for the average public servant .
There is no mystery to economics. These ministers talk about hindsight like economics was some great mystery. John Gilbraith wrote about these bubbles in his famous book about the 1929 stock market crash. The fact is Bertie, Hanafin and co are politicians first and foremost. They were carried on an economic wave they simply didn’t understand or want to understand.
The governments job is to govern.
They are the trustees of the economy. Across the nation we all go to work every day and we must take responsibility for the job we are entrusted to do.
No public service pension above €40k should be increased before 2020 and thereafter only under €50k. Pensions over €80k should not be increased before 2025 and pensions over €100k should not be increased before 2030. It’s time senior civil servants and politicians a big, big, big, reality check.
nice way to deflect from the pay rise the current dail deputies will receive…….not a mention about their rise and you can bet they will take the increase
Irish taxpayers have contributed €65.MILLION in the past four years to the numerous of our “retired” ministers and TDs …self regulated by a totally serving government!!! This “PLUNDERING of the public purse with no accountability is manifestly wrong!!! When will some one say STOP???????????
I worked 28 years in a semi state body my pension now from it is €120 per week, those f******s get €2615 per week ,that’s 120 times the rate I get per week not bad for people that bled and swindled the people and made sure their rich friends were looked after . I rest my case your honour.
ah here, i seriously can’t believe what i’m reading here. are these with it at all? can someone please drop them all in the ocean, get rid of them. this is just taking the pi** and they know it. i’m surprised nobody has tried to do it already.
“oh we can’t go doing that now, increasing peoples wages, the economy is not ready yet”
no, course ye can’t cos ye are a weird breed under the elites hand now. i really really cannot stand these people anymore. sick of them. sick of yer greed. ye will increase your own trough years before doing anything for the people who put ye in there.
This is so frustrating.
We need to find a way to get an explanation for a decision like this from the current Taoiseach on television. Like if for 30 minutes a week, increases like this are blown up on to an enormous screen behind Enda Kenny an he has to publicly stand by it and approve it.
Otherwise, we’ll have a rant about it for a few days here and they’ll still get their pay rise.
It frustrates me to no end how little accountability there is. Our finances need to be run like a business.
Sinn Féin says Verona Murphy has until end of the week to resign or face a no confidence motion
53 mins ago
38.0k
88
Paris
Woman tells court she was groped three times by French actor Gerard Depardieu
23 mins ago
203
White House
Trump says he will 'look into' Yemen group chat leak but continues to defend security advisor
19 hrs ago
52.2k
120
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 160 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 110 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 142 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 112 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 38 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 34 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 133 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 59 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 88 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say