Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
MARY LOU MCDONALD abused her parliamentary privilege when she named six former politicians as having allegedly evaded tax last November, a Dáil committee has found.
The Committee on Procedures and Privileges (CPP) has issued a formal ruling in recent days stating that the Sinn Féin deputy leader should not have named the politicians who were alleged to have offshore Ansbacher bank accounts.
McDonald read the names into the Dáil record last December when raising allegations from a whistleblower in the Department of Jobs who was investigating alleged tax evasion.
Two former Fianna Fáil ministers Máire Geoghegan-Quinn and Ray MacSharry, as well as ex-Progressive Democrat minister Desmond O’Malley, strenuously denied allegations that they ever had Ansbacher accounts.
All four complained to the CPP along with the Fianna Fáíl whip Seán Ó Fearghaíl who described McDonald’s remarks as a “gross misuse of Dáil privilege”.
In a ruling issued by the CPP, its chairman, and Dáil Ceann Comhairle, Seán Barrett, says that McDonald’s failure to withdraw the remarks following a previous ruling constitute an “abuse of privilege”.
The CPP said that on 4 March members determined that McDonald’s remarks had been defamatory and had requested that the TD make a statement in the Dáil withdrawing them.
In correspondence with the committee, McDonald questioned and disputed claims she had abused privilege and argued that she was covered by Dáil rules (Standing Orders) that give TDs parliamentary privilege.
In a letter to the CPP on 11 March, the Dublin Central TD said she had not been allowed to see the letters of complaint about her use of privilege and said the committee’s process for deciding the matter was “deeply flawed”.
The CPP “strongly rejected” McDonald’s claims in another meeting on 1 April. In the committee’s ruling, Barrett writes:
CPP is of the view that the right to one’s good name is a fundamental right, and persons outside of the House should not be referred to in a manner which would adversely affect their good names or reputations. The Constitution confers absolute privilege on members of Dáil Éireann in respect of their utterances in the House, and CPP is of the view that under no circumstances should this be abused.
“Deputy McDonald by failing to indicate her intention to withdraw the utterances by the date specified has in effect failed to withdraw them.
“In light of this CPP is now reporting to Dáil Éireann its findings that Deputy McDonald’s utterances were in the nature of being defamatory, and were prima facie an abuse of privilege, having regard to the provisions of Standing Order 59.”
While the findings of the committee will be read into the Dáil record when TDs come back from the Easter break next week it is not clear if McDonald will make a statement.
The Sinn Féin TD could not be reached for comment this evening and the party did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Syrian Observatory for Human Rights? You mean the pro-Al Nusra Brit in Coventry that refuses to cite his sources, data and methadology?
@Cormac Ó Braonáin: the SOHR the shifted is stance over the course of the war as the rebels became more extreme, while initially supporting the FSA during he first few years of the war, the SOHR does not support the rebels any more. The SOHR clearly sided with the Kurds during last January’s Turkish led Operation Olive Branch (the Turkish and Syrian Rebel invasion of Kurdish region of Afrin of NW Syria). The SOHR released a lot of inaccurate news reports that supported the Kurdish YPG (false claims of Kurdish victories against the Syrian Rebels). A bit like Comical Ali, remember him?
Here’s the bomb attack (graphic), seems it was a suicide bomber wearing an explosive vest…
US backed terrorists killed by US backed terrorists?
Divide and conquer.
@paul kelly: wtf?
@paul kelly:
The US government supported the Free Syrian Army, which was not an Islamic militant organisation.
ISIS hates the Western powers. therefore, the idea that the US government would support ISIS is absurd.
@Ciarán Masterson: As absurd as them supporting the Taliban and Al Quida?
@Ciarán Masterson: LOL – America have been supporting ISIS for years in Syria,
They like to play both sides of the coin, You genuinely have blinkers on and a childlike understanding of Americas role in all of this
@paul kelly: “US backed terrorists killed by US backed terrorists?”
Eh no, 9 civilians killed and about 20 injured, including children, when an ISIS suicide bomber blew himself up in a cafe. Here’s the bomb attack (graphic)
@paul kelly: If you’re referring to the Kurds, no. The YPG doesn’t do suicide bombings and nowhere in the Journal article does it say who was responsible. And in any case, it was mostly civilians that were killed.
US-backed soldier? Who makes this shyte up? The word is Mercenary
Even thought US is leaving Syria the economic sanctions and sanctions against any ships going to Syria…By both the EU and US…..Will keep the people of Syria impoverished for years….Unable to rebuild their country….
5 US soldiers killed according to Turkish leader Erdogan in his address, He is stating that it was an attack designed to keep the us in Syria, but he thinks it won`t affect the US withdrawal as it would mean a victory for Daesh.
have your say