Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Anthony Devlin/PA Archive/PA Images

Polish workers lose discrimination case over McDonald’s English-only policy

Grzegorz Delanowski and Leszek Pajak claimed their employer’s English-only policy discriminated against them on the basis of race.

THE EQUALITY TRIBUNAL has ruled against two Polish workers who claimed their employer’s English-only policy discriminated against them on the basis of race.

Grzegorz Delanowski and Leszek Pajak have been employed by Kellsydan Ltd, which operates four McDonald’s franchises in Limerick, since 2005 and 2007 respectively.

They brought the discrimination case on the basis that the company insists employees use English at all times.

The rule applies to the restaurant floor and kitchen area as well as in meetings with management, where the complainants said disputes have arisen over translation during disciplinary hearings.

The respondent stated that company policy does not ban employees from speaking any language other than English and that it recognises it might sometimes be appropriate when a customer initiates a conversation in another language.

It also claimed that employees are allowed to speak their own language during their break, provided that no other employee is being excluded.

The company said it uses English as its business language to ensure inclusion and business efficiency, as well as for health and safety reasons.

Tribunal Equality Officer Caroline McEnery said she was satisfied that any one of these three reasons justifies the use of English as a business language and that the complainants had failed to establish a case of discriminatory treatment.

The two rulings can be read here and here

Read: Woman awarded €33k after security guard ‘massaged her buttocks’

Read: ‘It’s very hard to compete with a company that doesn’t pay any taxes’ – Supermac’s chief

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Author
Catherine Healy
View 75 comments
Close
75 Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds