Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
FIANNA FÁIL LEADER Micheál Martin has said that he believes the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution needs to be removed.
Martin said he had arrived at the decision after a “long period of reflection” and for many different reasons.
His endorsement of the removal of The Eighth makes him the first of the two largest parties’ leaders to officially signify their intentions. In contrast, Taoiseach Leo Varadkar’s current position is that he will reveal his own approach to the Eighth at the end of this month.
Speaking in Dáil Éireann this afternoon, Martin said that “if we are sincere then we must act”.
“Because the Eighth Amendment has been shown to cause real damage to Irishwomen,” he began.
Because it has caused real harm to the quality of care available to pregnant women at critical moments; because it has not and cannot change the reality that abortion is a present and permanent part of Irish life, because it seeks to force women to carry a pregnancy to term when they have been the victim of a rape or incest or when they have received the diagnosis of a fatal foetal abnormality, because it requires that pregnant women and doctors are faced with criminal sanctions.
“And because it prevents us from responding in a humane way in order to help women in the most traumatic situations.”
Because of these reasons and following a long period of reflection and assessment of evidence before the Oireachtas Committee, I believe that we should remove the Eighth amendment from Bunreacht na hÉireann and I will vote accordingly.
He added that he believes the Eighth will in all likelihood need to be replaced, rather than a straight repeal.
“Before deciding on this I would like to see the legal advice which the government says is being prepared,” he said.
However, I feel it is likely that we may need to agree a replacement which gives certainty to the Oireachtas’ right to legislate. This need not be a complex provision, but it may be the only way to prevent significant unintended consequences in future court cases which are inevitable.
Earlier in his speech, Martin said that “abortion is not an issue where a unanimous opinion is possible”.
He stressed that his current opinion is a departure from the fact that “over the years I have been on the record as being against a significant change in our abortion laws”.
He made clear however, that he had decided on his approach by reading the Oireachtas Committee on the Eighth’s “report, the transcripts of its hearings and written submissions”.
He added: “Most importantly I have sought to listen to the diverse contributions of women.”
“Women known to the public only by a single letter of the alphabet have exposed the cruel inflexibility and unintended consequences of the Eighth Amendment,” he said, in referral to the women involved in the A, B, C, and X cases.
He said that the testimony of obstetrics professionals “has had a deep impact on me”.
“If we are sincere in our compassion for women and if we are sincere in respecting their choices then we must act.”
As has already been said in earlier contributions, in an increasing number of cases abortions are happening here. The availability of pills which can cause an abortion in the first 70 days of a pregnancy is widespread and growing. This is not going to change.
“So it is untrue to say that the issue before us is whether there will be abortion in Ireland or not.”
The Eighth Amendment does not mean that Ireland is a country without abortion. Retaining the Eighth Amendment will not make Ireland a country without abortion. Nothing we say or do here could make Ireland a country without abortion.
Good luck in your new home! It’s a great relief to finally have your own keys after years of paying rent.
Good luck in your new home, and if you can, up your mortgage payment to reduce the life of the mortgage. It’s pays off in the long run.
@Gigi Power: that’s a terrible idea. Here’s why. If you’re paying extra and after say, 10 years, you fall on hard times, & cant pay, your house will be repossessed. Mortgage interests should be lower than regular loan rates. Invest any extra money into a high return account, and when you have the amount saved to pay off the balance, you can do so. However, if you’re making more on interest, than you’re paying in interest, you’re better off not paying it off early, plus consider any tax benefits.
@Mickey Amoko: you have more chance of losing your ‘high interest’ investments than being unable to repay your home and have it repossessed. For a tiny €850 a month mortgage, good advice is to pay more if you have the ability to do so, and if you need to, you can always re-structure. Sifting through the nonsense statements on J.ie, as usual.
Having to revolut her partner 20e to buy stuff for builders seems pretty odd mid week . Would he not buy stuff unless she contributed or use joint account ?
@Daniel: they would be getting no tea or biscuits after waking me up at 6.15am with a call!!!
Liked the read. I will be (hopefully) buying my home early in the new year so found this interest. Ye are doing great.
The term ‘partner’ is mentioned 25 times in this article, is that really necessary?
@Jack: did you count that? Is it necessary for me to check?
This writer is the most “Aisling” contributor to date. Love it.
Great read Nigella
have your say