Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Shutterstock

Exclusion of institutions from inquiry concerning to mother-and-baby groups

Groups representing mothers and their children question why some institutions may not be included.

A NUMBER OF groups representing the women and children that were in mother and baby homes have raised concerns about the interdepartmental report published today.

The new Minister for Children and Youth Affairs, James Reilly published the report examining what the government know about the homes. Judge Yvonne Murphy was also announced as the chairperson of the Commission of Investigation into mother and baby homes.

Omissions

While Paul Redmond, spokesperson for the Coalition of Mother and Baby Homes Survivors (CMABS) said that report published today was “reasonably comprehensive” he said there were some “glaring omissions”.

The citing of some holding centres, but the exclusion of the Temple Hill holding centre was concerning, they said.

He said that only including registered births to calculate figures in the nine mother and baby homes instead of the numbers of expectant mothers “also seriously misrepresents and downplays the numbers involved” he claimed.

Redmond also stated that it is presently unclear from the report of the interdepartmental group whether all of the institutions will be included in the terms of reference.

The conclusions from the report seem to indicate that the county homes will not be expressly included in the inquiry, as regards providing redress.

Derek Leinster, Chairperson of the Bethany Survivors Group said the omission of the Protestant West Bank Home from the report was concerning to them.

Ryan Commission

He said the reference that the commission will not re-investigating institutions covered by the Ryan Commission “makes no sense when it comes to Protestant survivors” they added.

We pointed out in our submission, the Ryan Commission did not investigate these institutions. The Ryan Commission stated there were few if any Protestant orphans because, ‘there was a waiting list of would–be adopters’.That was not the experience of the vast majority never adopted in the Westbank Orphanage Co Wicklow, or the foster children in the care of the Nurse Rescue Society, who were used as free farm labourers from the age of five.

“Although the Bethany Home is mentioned, at last, what about the Church of Ireland Magdalen home that was also a so-called mother and baby home?” he asked.

“The abuse this group suffered has never been investigated and, if this report has its way, never will. If this goes through, it will be a disgrace and a farce” said Leinster.

CMABS also expressed disappointment that an international judge was not appointed, and whilst acknowledging Judge Murphy did a commendable job chairing the Murphy Commission into child sex abuse, the coalition said they are aware of concerns by symphysiotomy survivors regarding the redress scheme which Judge Murphy was recently involved in overseeing, they said.

The report published today stated that the time available to the group to survey the many issues and diverse sources of information has been extremely compressed. “Initial examinations have served to highlight the volume and range of records that are potentially relevant to the work of the Commission,”it stated.

Read: Number of maternity homes a difficulty for mother and baby inquiry>

Read: Almost 500 unclaimed infant bodies were sent to anatomy departments from 1940-65>

Read: Over 222 children died in Bethany Home but 1939 report says they appeared ‘happy’>

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds