Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Leah Farrell/RollingNews.ie

Dismissal of Mothercare worker over unauthorised refunds was fair

When questioned, the woman could not explain why there were transactions when there were no customers at the counter.

THE EMPLOYMENT APPEALS Tribunal has found that the dismissal of an employee in a Mothercare store was fair.

The assistant store manager became concerned about the woman’s handling of refunds and CCTV footage showed possible irregularities in 24 transactions. The operations controller met with her to discuss the four most recent incidents.

In all four cases, there was no customer or product at the counter at the time of the transaction and customer details were either invalid, illegible or missing entirely from the receipts.

The employee was unable to give any satisfactory explanation for these discrepancies over the course of a number of meetings and an internal investigation. She was dismissed on the grounds of gross misconduct.

In her evidence, she said the operations controller had called her after Christmas that year asking her to work on Sundays but she did not want to. She claims he told her she was taking off too many days together and was rude and aggressive on the phone.

She wanted this noted in his file and she said the decision to dismiss her was disproportionate. The woman said a redeployment or demotion would have been more appropriate.

She also said she was not aware of the seriousness of the situation.

In her decision, chairperson of the tribunal KT O’Mahoney said:

Trust and confidence are essential elements in the employment relationship and a particularly high level of trust and confidence is reposed in a manager, who is responsible for implementing store policy. Breaching the refunds procedure and the failure to offer any satisfactory or any explanation for these breaches destroyed that trust and confidence and constituted gross misconduct warranting summary dismissal.

She said the tribunal did not accept the woman was unaware of the seriousness of what was happening as letters inviting her to the investigation meeting were clear on this.

For these reasons, the tribunal unanimously found the dismissal was fair.

Read: Government told: 2,000 gardaí need to get out from behind desks and get back on the street>

Read: Woman’s injury claim thrown out after fitness photos shown in court>

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Author
Michelle Hennessy
View 10 comments
Close
10 Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds