Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Rónán Mullen on Newstalk's Lunchtime programme today Newstalk.ie

Rónán Mullen: I am wondering if it is defamatory to suggest I was 'smirking'

Rónán Mullen has again defended himself and denied accusations that he was unpleasant to women who came to Leinster House last week to share their painful experiences of abortion outside of Ireland.

SENATOR RÓNÁN MULLEN says claims he was smirking during a meeting of TDs and Senators with women sharing their experiences of abortion outside of Ireland were “designed to portray me unsympathetically.”

He was speaking after the husband of one of the women who addressed the meeting accused him of smirking during the meeting at Leinster House last week in advance of the defeated Private Members’ Bill which would have legalised abortion in instances where the life of a mother is at risk.

Speaking on Newstalk’s Lunchtime programme, the independent senator said that during the meeting between Oireachtas members and the three women who had undergone abortions because of serious foetal disabilities he had expressed a view that abortion was not the the “best response in that situation”.

He then claimed that James Burke – who he did not know at the time – said “something like: ‘I could debate with you more easily if  you weren’t smirking all the time’”.

“I began to feel really uncomfortable that it was kind of a comment designed to portray me unsympathetically,” Mullen said before speculating that the comments from Burke may have been defamatory.

Anybody that knows my views on abortion would know how distressing I find the whole topic and anybody who would have heard how I addressed the persons in that room would know…. I mean to be honest with you I am wondering if it is defamatory to suggest…

Mullen said that the atmosphere then became uncomfortable as many of the TDs and senators in the room could not offer the three women the response that they were looking for in terms of legislation.

He described the comments about his alleged smirking as not appropriate, adding: “A person is entitled to their physiognomy and to their facial expression but I actually felt in that moment that it was kind of a comment that seemed to be targeted at me.”

During the course of the interview with Newstalk’s Jonathan Healy, it was put to the senator that Burke had claimed that Mullen on two occasions had asked him (Burke) had he a bigger agenda. Mullen said “that was not the case”.

He also said he did not say “well played” as Burke had claimed and that during the course of his interaction with James and his wife the body language was “very hostile”.

Mullen reiterated his opposition to abortion in any circumstances, outlining his view that there were alternatives even in circumstances where the baby had no chance of life outside the womb.

He that he was not going to be “pushed out of the debate” because his view represented that of many men and women who had been in contact with him.

Mullen also said that the media needs to do more to bring out the views of children whose parents believe they should be allowed to live out their lives even in circumstances where they are not expected to survive.

He added that the abuse he received on social media over the course of the weekend “doesn’t bother me personally”.

“In many ways it might be a backhanded compliment that I might sometimes be effective in communicating a particular point of view,” he added.

Mullen: Reports I smirked at abortion meeting “entirely untrue”

Ronan Mullen horrified at ‘nasty’ suggestions over abortion debate

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
151 Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds