Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Pai at today's vote. UPI/PA Images

US regulator votes to scrap net neutrality rules

Campaigners say the repeal will make the internet less free and open.

US REGULATORS HAVE voted to roll back so-called “net neutrality” rules that require internet providers to treat all traffic equally, amid an acrimonious debate over how it impacts online freedom.

The Federal Communications Commission, in a 3-2 vote, adopted a proposal by Republican appointed chairman Ajit Pai, who said his plan would end “heavy-handed” rules which discourage investment and innovation.

Democratic member Mignon Clyburn, one of the two dissenters, said the agency “is handing the keys to the internet” to “a handful of multi-billion dollar corporations.”

The vote followed a heated partisan debate and is just the latest in a battle over more than a decade on rules governing internet service providers in the courts and the FCC.

Net neutrality activists have staged a series of protests in cities around the US and online, amid fears that dominant broadband providers could change how the internet works by favoring its own services and hindering those of rivals.

Pai said ahead of the vote that his plan would restore “light-touch” rules which allowed the internet to flourish, and promote investments to enable new and emerging services.

“The digital world bears no resemblance to a water pipe or electric line or sewer,” Pai said.

Entrepreneurs and innovators guided the internet far better than the heavy hand of government.

But dissenting FCC commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel said the rollback will hurt consumers and others.

“Net neutrality is internet freedom. I support that freedom,” she said.

“This decision puts the Federal Communications Commission on the wrong side of history, the wrong side of the law, and the wrong side of the American public.”

© AFP 2017

READ: Nelson Mandela family ‘dismayed’ by €18m funeral corruption claims>

READ: Legal abortion in cases of rape would be a ‘GP-led service’ under draft proposals>

Author
View 69 comments
Close
69 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel

     
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds