Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Among the many provisions of the proposed new laws is the abandonment of the traditional court wigs and robes for barristers. Legal wig via Shutterstock

Majority of solicitors don’t expect legal change to cut fees

An annual survey of law firms reveals broad cynicism in the industry about the effects of the Legal Services Bill.

Updated, 11:11

A CLEAR MAJORITY of Irish law firms have said they do not expect Alan Shatter’s legislation on reforming the legal profession to lower the fees they charge to clients.

An annual survey carried out by financial services firm Smith & Williamson showed that 72 per cent of solicitors’ firms did not expect the Legal Services Regulation Bill to have an impact on the fees they charge.

The legislation was approved by the Cabinet in October 2011 and introduced to the Oireachtas shortly afterward, but has languished at committee stage for nearly a year, pending discussion on amendments suggested by TDs.

Shatter had heralded the bill as offering “greater transparency for legal costs and greater assistance and protection for consumers of legal services”.

The system would also set up a new body to investigate allegation of professional misconduct, and to adjudicate on disputes over the amount being charged by legal practitioners for their services.

The survey also showed that only one in four firms supported regulation by an independent body. Currently the Law Society regulates the enrolment, conduct and business of solicitors, but it does not regulate solicitors’ practices.

That body has vocally criticised the provisions of the legislation, which it believes gives indirect control of the industry to the government itself.

This is because the legislation would set up a new Legal Services Regulatory Authority which would take over the existing legal functions of both the Law Society and the Bar Council, which regulates barristers. The new authority’s board would feature a majority of members appointed by the minister.

There was slightly warmer response to the Bill’s proposal to allow solicitors and barristers to practice together, something which is formally barred under current rules which prohibit barristers from having explicit roles in law practices.

40 per cent of respondents were in favour of that idea.

Author’s note: This article previously stated that the survey was commissioned by the Law Society. In fact, that body had no role in commissioning the survey. We are happy to correct this.

Read: Legal Services Bill is not an ambush on the sector, says Shatter

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
33 Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds