SOUTH KOREA AND the United States fired off missiles this morning simulating a precision strike against North Korea’s leadership, in response to a landmark inter-continental ballistic missile (ICBM) test described by Kim Jong-Un as a gift to “American bastards”.
Tuesday’s launch, acknowledged as an ICBM by Washington, marked a milestone in Pyongyang’s decades-long drive for the capability to threaten the US mainland with a nuclear strike, and poses a stark foreign policy challenge for Donald Trump.
The US president had vowed that “won’t happen”, but independent experts said it could reach Alaska or even further towards the continental US.
It will require a reassessment of the threat posed by the nuclear-armed North, which has carried out five atomic tests and said the multi-stage rocket’s warhead could survive atmospheric re-entry to strike a target.
Amid international condemnation of the test, South Korean and US military forces launched short-range ballistic missiles of their own less than 24 hours afterwards from the peninsula into the Sea of Japan.
Both weapons homed in on their target, the South’s Joint Chiefs of Staff said, “diplaying the capability of a precision strike against the enemy headquarters in times of emergency”.
The South’s new President Moon Jae-In, who backs engagement with Pyongyang to bring it to the negotiating table, said the North’s “serious provocation required us to react with more than just a statement”.
US general Vincent Brooks, the Combined Forces commander in South Korea, said: “Self restraint, which is a choice, is all that separates armistice and war.
“As this Alliance missile live fire shows, we are able to change our choice when so ordered by our Alliance national leaders.”
The two countries are in a security alliance, with 28,500 US troops stationed in the South to protect it.
Their language is likely to infuriate Pyongyang, which says it needs nuclear weapons to defend itself against the threat of invasion and has been subjected to multiple sets of UN sanctions over its atomic and missile programmes.
The launches came hours after a joint appeal by the presidents of China and Russia for all sides to exercise restraint and ease tensions.
Disagreement on how best to respond will complicate discussions at the UN, where the Security Council was due to meet in emergency session later today after Secretary-General Antonio Guterres condemned the North’s launch as a “dangerous escalation”.
‘New escalation’
After personally overseeing the test, the North’s leader Kim Jong-Un ”said American bastards would be not very happy with this gift sent on the 4 July anniversary”, the official Korean Central News Agency reported.
Breaking into peals of laughter, KCNA said, he “added that we should send them gifts once in a while to help break their boredom”.
Kim had inspected the Hwasong-14 missile and “expressed satisfaction, saying it looked as handsome as a good-looking boy and was well made”.
Questions remain over the precise capabilities of the weapon, but KCNA said it was a multi-stage rocket with a carbon composite nose cone that could carry a “large, heavy nuclear warhead”.
The test had shown it could survive the harsh conditions of re-entry into the Earth’s atmosphere, including “heat reaching thousands of degrees centigrade”, to “accurately hit the target”, it said.
The missile only travelled little more than 900 kilometres to come down in the Sea of Japan, but the altitude it reached, more than 2,800 kilometres according to Pyongyang, demonstrated it can travel far further.
South Korea’s defence minister Han Min-koo put its range at 7,000 to 8,000 kilometres, far enough to put US Pacific Command in Hawaii within reach.
US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson strongly condemned the launch, saying: “Testing an ICBM represents a new escalation of the threat to the United States, our allies and partners, the region, and the world.
“As we, along with others, have made clear, we will never accept a nuclear-armed North Korea.”
But experts said that particular red line had already been crossed.
“The window for negotiating denuclearisation is closed,” Jeffrey Lewis, an expert in nuclear non-proliferation, told AFP.
“The big point is that we have to accept North Korea with a nuclear-armed ICBM.”
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
have your say