Skip to content
Support Us

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

President Obama making his statement about the phonecall. Charles Dharapak/AP/Press Association Images

US and Iranian presidents speak by phone in first direct contact since 1979

The call to discuss Iran’s nuclear programme shows evidence of an unprecedented opening of relations between the two nations.

US PRESIDENT BARACK Obama and Iran’s President Hassan Rouhani spoke by phone today — the first direct contact between leaders of their two nations since the Islamic revolution of 1979.

The call, which came after the two leaders failed to meet at the UN General Assembly in New York, provided dramatic evidence of an unprecedented opening in relations between the Islamic Republic and a foe it has reviled as the “Great Satan.”

“Just now, I spoke on the phone with President Rouhani of the Islamic Republic of Iran,” Obama said in a televised statement.

“The two of us discussed our ongoing efforts to reach an agreement over Iran’s nuclear programme,” Obama said.

“We’re mindful of all the challenges ahead. The very fact that this was the first communication between an American and Iranian president since 1979 underscores the deep mistrust between our countries, but it also indicates the prospect of moving beyond that difficult history. I do believe that there is a basis for a resolution.”

Obama said he told Rouhani that he believed a “resolution” was possible to the dispute over Iran’s uranium enrichment programme, which the West believes is a covert effort to produce nuclear weapons, a charge Tehran denies.

Washington and Israel have both warned of the possibility of military action if diplomacy fails to assuage their concerns over the nuclear program.

Twitter

The Iranian presidency confirmed the telephone call between Obama and Rouhani.

“The two insisted on political will for quick resolution to the nuclear issue, as well as paving the ground for resolving other issues and cooperation in regional issues,” the presidency said on its website.

A Twitter account run by Rouhani’s office also gave details of the call.

“In phone convo, President Rouhani and President @BarackObama expressed their mutual political will to rapidly solve the nuclear issue,” one tweet said.

image

President Rouhani listens to a question as security personnel wait in the wings during a discussion at the Hilton Hotel in Manhattan yesterday (AP Photo/John Minchillo)

Another tweet paraphrasing Rouhani read: “I express my gratitude for your hospitality and your phone call. Have a good day Mr President”.

Obama meanwhile even apologised for the traffic in New York, according to a Rouhani tweet, in a startling sign of the new tone in relations between the two longtime enemies.

The call took place after pathbreaking bilateral talks yesterday between Secretary of State John Kerry and Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif at the UN — on the sidelines of wider discussions on the nuclear programme between Iran and major world powers.

Rouhani earlier continued his charm offensive in New York, a trip which set the next high level talks on the nuclear program next month.

He said in a press conference that Iran would present a plan at the talks in Geneva to resolve concerns over its nuclear programme and vowed never to deviate from promises to the West.

“Iran will prepare that plan and will present it in Geneva. We hope it will serve as an even more effective step to settle the nuclear issue,” Rouhani said.

Rouhani said he hoped to resolve the nuclear row in a “short period of time,” a day after his foreign minister said that major powers had set a goal of a deal within one year.

The soft-spoken cleric swept to power in June, succeeding the firebrand Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, on promises to ease tensions over Iran’s nuclear programme, which has triggered a crippling US-led campaign of sanctions on Iran.

© AFP, 2013

Read: Government closure possible in US as politicians deadlocked over budget >

Read: Bill Gates admits CTRL-ALT-DELETE was a mistake >

Author
View 41 comments
Close
41 Comments
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Anthony O'Donnell
    Favourite Anthony O'Donnell
    Report
    Oct 17th 2011, 8:48 AM

    Shrinking animals ,oh my lord people will believe anything ………. it is October not the 1st of April isn’t it.

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Brian Ó Dálaigh
    Favourite Brian Ó Dálaigh
    Report
    Oct 17th 2011, 10:36 AM

    Anthony, it is a well documented fact that atmospheric and environmental changes are inextricable linked to the size of animal. If we take a large section of earth’s history, the age of dinosaurs, this period was linked with very high oxygen levels. Much more so than exists today. The presence of oxygen enabled many of the earth’s animals to grow to extraordinary sizes. This size of animal is simply not possible in today’s climate because there is simply not enough oxygen to sustain the size. The only real exception is the Blue Whale. Environmental factors also influence size. Take the African elephant as an example. A group of these were stranded on islands in the Mediterranean at the end of the last Ice Age. When these islands became separated from the African continent it lead to a process whereby the elephants became miniature. These mini elephants, while now extinct, are well documented by the Romans and the Greeks. Look at Flores Man in Indonesia, a species of human believed to be the source of many hobbit, dwarf, etc.myths of Asia. Isolation on an island, combined with other environmental factors stunted its growth. The same can be seen with the Twa people of Congo, Burundi and Rwanda who still exist today. We know many factors stunt growth, including carbon monoxide (found in cigarettes), so how is it a step too far to believe that our pumping of noxious and toxic chemicals into the atmosphere is not also contributing to shrinking animals? After all, it is also well documented that we have changed our climate, our environment. Heck, we’ve even caused seas such as the Aral Sea (formerly 68,000 km2) to all but vanish. How do you think the animals in that area are surviving? In cases such as this, it’s the smallest animals, those that need less to survive, that will be successful procreators. This inevitably leads to shrinking animals.

    26
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Anthony O'Donnell
    Favourite Anthony O'Donnell
    Report
    Oct 17th 2011, 6:34 PM

    Food for thought Brian , at this stage i am a cynic about anything i read in the media but you have made me think .

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Annette Mcloughlin
    Favourite Annette Mcloughlin
    Report
    Oct 17th 2011, 7:45 PM

    Very interesting article Brian ,have just seen it today and must say NOTHING would surprise me in this day and age

    1
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds