Take our survey • Win a prize
Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

1 August 2011: Floral tributes to the victims of the two attacks are left outside Oslo Cathedral. AP Photo/Lefteris Pitarakis/PA

Oslo attack 'could have been prevented'

Investigation into official response to double terror attack last summer also found that the attacker could have been arrested much sooner.

NORWEGIAN AUTHORITIES could have prevented the first of twin attacks that killed 77 people in July 2011 and arrested Anders Behring Breivik sooner as he carried out the second, investigators said Monday.

An independent commission tasked by Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg with reviewing the authorities’ response to the attacks submitted its 500-page report to him on Monday, handing down harsh criticism of both the police and the government.

On July 22, 2011, Breivik set off a car bomb outside government buildings in Oslo, killing eight people, before going to the island of Utoya, northwest of the capital, where he spent more than an hour gunning down another 69 people, mostly teenagers, and wounding dozens of others.

The victims, the youngest of whom had just celebrated her 14th birthday, had been attending a summer camp hosted by the governing Labour Party’s youth organisation.

“The attack on the government complex on July 22 could have been prevented through effective implementation of already adopted security measures,” the commission said.

The 10-member commission criticised the fact that due to bureaucratic red tape the street outside the government office complex had never been closed to traffic in line with recommendations dating back to 2004.

This enabled Breivik to park a small rental truck carrying some 950 kilos of explosives at the foot of the prime minister’s 17-storey office building. Stoltenberg was working at his official residence at the time and was not injured in the attack.

‘Unacceptable’

The commission, headed by lawyer Alexandra Bech Gjoerv, also criticised the police’s slow response. More than three hours passed between the Oslo bombing and Breivik’s arrest on Utoya, where he spent an hour and fifteen minutes gunning down his victims.

“The authorities’ ability to protect the people on Utoya island failed. A more rapid police operation was a realistic possibility,” the report said, adding: “The perpetrator could have been stopped earlier on July 22.”

The report lamented police shortcomings before and during the Utoya shooting, noting the tardiness with which the description of Breivik and his vehicle were released, communication problems, failure to follow procedures, and inadequate means, among other things.

Utoya is a small island located on a lake, just 600 metres from shore.

Yet a total of 35 minutes passed between a first police patrol’s arrival on the lakeshore and the moment when an elite police squad disembarked on Utoya. Bech Gjoerv qualified the delay as “unacceptable.”

The two officers who arrived first on the lakeshore should have done everything possible to get to the island, according to police instructions in the event of a shooting, but they said they couldn’t find a boat and had received orders to carry out tactical observations.

It was ultimately the police’s elite Delta force, which arrived from Oslo some 40 kilometres away, that was first to land on the island at 6.27 pm, albeit after experiencing difficulties of their own.

Their simple rubber dinghy was overloaded and broke down, forcing them to borrow two pleasure boats.

According to the commission, if procedures had been respected, police could have been on the island by 6:15 pm, or 12 minutes earlier, which could possibly have saved lives, though the commission did not say as much.

Stoltenberg said he “regretted” the “significant shortcomings” highlighted in the report, but ruled out his own resignation or that of any members of his cabinet.

“The best way for me to take responsibility is to ensure that the necessary measures to improve security are carried out,” Stoltenberg told a press conference.

Police meanwhile reiterated their apology for not arresting Breivik sooner, but also ruled out any resignations.

The commission issued a list of 31 recommendations — some of which have already been adopted — ranging from better preparedness to limiting the availability of semi-automatic weapons and improving police helicopter capacity.

Breivik’s 10-week trial on charges of “acts of terror” concluded in late June and a verdict is scheduled to be announced on August 24.

- (c) AFP, 2012

One year on: Norway remembers victims of Oslo, Utoya attacks >

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

View 3 comments
Close
3 Comments
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Tim Henchin
    Favourite Tim Henchin
    Report
    Nov 16th 2011, 9:01 AM

    ………. what is the betting that not one of them will have a legitimate mandate. We live in a post-democratic age, it is disturbing to see how many accepted this.

    We have the man who fudged Greece’s books, so they could get in to the Euro, while he was the head of their banking system made leader. It is like having Sean Fitzpatrick rammed in as leader of this state by Europe.

    It will either go down in history as the start of a dark but temporary blot on European democratic history or else as a great day for Europe, written by our new technocratic masters in the future, the corporatization of the continent. There used to be a name for the merging of corporate power and State control in to one entity. A predecessor of this man invented it.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FnTOiso08HM

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Uncle Mort
    Favourite Uncle Mort
    Report
    Nov 16th 2011, 9:40 AM

    Good link Tim,thanks for sharing it.
    The mention of the ‘intense talks’ by Monti begs the question as the what bribes were offered, by bribes I mean offers of position and power.

    1
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds