Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

A Syrian activist is silhouetted through the Syrian revolution flag. Hussein Malla/AP/Press Association Images

Oxfam urges EU foreign ministers to extend the arms embargo on Syria

Transferring more weapons to Syria can only “exacerbate a hellish scenario for civilians” says Oxfam, who say extending the embargo would avoid fuelling an arms race.

NOT EXTENDING THE existing arms embargo on Syria will risk making the situation for civilians in the country even worse, according to international aid agency Oxfam.

EU Foreign Ministers are meeting on Monday and the humanitarian agency says failure to extend the EU arms embargo at the end of the month would be “irresponsible and could scupper the fragile glimmer of hope for progress offered by the US-Russian peace summit scheduled for June”.

80,000 people have already lost their lives

UN figures show that more than 80,000 people have already lost their lives since the start of the Syria crisis two years ago and almost seven million people inside the country need humanitarian aid.

Currently, the EU arms embargo forbids the transfer of lethal weapons to Syria – whether to government forces or the opposition.

Oxfam Ireland’s Chief Executive Jim Clarken said that if the EU arms embargo was to end it could have devastating consequences. He said:

There are no easy answers when trying to stop the bloodshed in Syria, but sending more arms and ammunition clearly isn’t one of them. International efforts should be focused on halting arms transfers to all sides and finding a political solution to the crisis.

There are serious risks arms could be used to commit human rights violations. And the risks of diversion of weapons and the likely humanitarian consequences are very real. We are already seeing the catastrophic humanitarian impact of this crisis on civilians.

While a relaxation of the arms embargo would “pave the way” for EU states to arm the opposition, Oxfam states it would “almost certainly fan the flames of the conflict and cost lives”.

Mr Clarken said the UK and France are taking a “risky course of action” and that diplomacy “should be the priority”.

Read: Turkey and US demand Assad stand down>

Read: Syria: 3.1 million children need ‘urgent’ help>

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
28 Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds