Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Watch: Patrick Honohan bangs table as he comes to 'loggerheads' with Pearse Doherty

The banking inquiry got animated today.

CENTRAL BANK GOVERNOR Patrick Honohan got rather animated today as he answered questions at the Oireachtas banking inquiry.

Honohan was appearing before the committee to clarify comments he made in January.

“What I said was not clear – I interrupted myself, as I do all the time,” Honohan said of his previous appearance, noting he didn’t always finish sentences and used colloquialisms.

Honohan confirmed that the former secretary general of the Department of Finance, David Doyle, contacted him about his initial appearance.

Video TheJournal.ie / YouTube

The governor clarified that he had not spoken to Doyle about a note he had sent to the Department of Finance’s former assistant secretary general, Kevin Cardiff, in September 2008 saying Anglo would need €8.5 billion.

Sinn Féin’s Pearse Doherty questioned Honohan on this issue several times until he said the TD’s line of questioning could put him in a position where “I look like I don’t know anything”.

Screenshot 2015-03-11 at 16.24.29 Pearse Doherty Oireachtas.ie Oireachtas.ie

Honohan banged the table, leading Doherty to state: “I’m sorry we appear to be at loggerheads.”

At this point, committee chair Ciaran Lynch stepped in, asking: “Was there a discussion with Mr Doyle or Mr Cardiff?”

Screenshot 2015-03-11 at 16.03.57 Ciaran Lynch Oireachtas.ie Oireachtas.ie

Honohan said he did not talk about the note with Doyle, but stated: “There was possibly a discussion with Mr Cardiff.” However, he stressed that if a discussion took place it was not significant as it would have been two years after the fact.

Bank guarantee

Earlier Honohan told the inquiry it is important to keep the impact of bank guarantee “in perspective”.

The decisions on the night of the guarantee did of course have consequences for Ireland. But there has been a tendency to overstate the extent of the impact of that night’s decisions on the subsequent welfare of the nation.

Honohan said “at least 80-90% of the overall hardship that followed the bursting of the bubble, was – albeit unbeknownst to the decision-makers that night – already inescapably embedded in the situation”.

Banking Enquiry. Pictured Inquiry into Honohan arriving at Leinster House today. Sam Boal / Photocall Ireland Sam Boal / Photocall Ireland / Photocall Ireland

“The damage had been made unavoidable by the unrestrained credit and property boom.

The fiscal austerity measures that have had to be taken are not just due to the €40 billion or so in additional net debt that can be linked to the guarantee, but also reflect the far larger impact of the ending of the construction boom on the government’s tax revenue and spending needs.

Honohan said the need for “austerity measures” such as “tax increases and expenditure reductions that have proved necessary since, could have been reduced somewhat, but not all that much, by anything done at the end of September 2008″.

The governor said he remained of the view that both Anglo and Irish Nationwide should have been nationalised “by the end of that week”, adding that leaving them in the hands of management was “very risky”.

Hunter vs hunted

Joe Higgins asked if Honohan understands why people might be annoyed with his view that the guarantee didn’t cause most of the country’s financial hardship.

Honohan people shouldn’t be “shocked” with his view as “other things were wrong in society”, noting the pain “would have been severe” with or without the guarantee.

This led Higgins to use an African proverb:

At this stage, Lynch just wanted to wrap things up – replying in jest:

Brian Lenihan wanted to burn bondholders – but he was overruled

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Author
Órla Ryan
View 96 comments
Close
96 Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds