Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Protestors demonstrating against military action in Syria stand outside the Houses of Parliament in Westminster, London. Stefan Rousseau/PA Wire

Poll: Should international military forces intervene in Syria?

The British House of Commons has rejected a call for military strikes but do you think international forces should intervene in Syria?

THE UNITED STATES is now looking elsewhere for international partners in action against the Syrian regime after the British House of Commons rejected a call for military strikes.

Members of the UN security council have been meeting to discuss possible intervention, with leaders coming out strongly against the regime over the alleged chemical weapons attack against its own people.

So we’re asking: Do you think international military forces should intervene in Syria?


Poll Results:

No (2368)
I'm not sure (1299)
Yes (1000)

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
159 Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds