Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
MORE THAN ONE in four deaths in children under five are linked to polluted environments, according to two new World Health Organization reports published today.
Each year, environmental risks such as indoor and outdoor pollution, second-hand smoke, unsafe water and poor sanitation kill around 1.7 million children between the ages of one month and five years, the reports found.
Harmful exposure can start in the mother’s womb, increasing the risk of premature birth, which can lead to life-long health problems.
When children are exposed to air pollutants they also can face a lifelong increased risk of chronic respiratory diseases, like asthma, and of heart disease, stroke and cancer.
The findings were in line with a WHO study published last year showing that about a quarter of all deaths worldwide, across all age groups, were attributable to environmental factors like air, water and soil pollution, as well as unsafe roads and workplace stress.
But the new reports highlight the particular dangers faced by the youngest in society.
‘Especially vulnerable’
“A polluted environment is a deadly one, particularly for young children,” WHO chief Margaret Chan said in a statement.
“Their developing organs and immune systems, and smaller bodies and airways, make them especially vulnerable to dirty air and water,” she said.
An estimated 570,000 children under five die each year from respiratory infections such as pneumonia, which are attributable to air pollution and second-hand smoke, the reports found.
And 361,000 others are killed by diarrhoea resulting from poor access to clean water, sanitation and hygiene, the agency said.
Another 200,000 children under five die from unintentional injuries linked to unhealthy environments, including poisonings, falls and drowning, WHO said.
The agency emphasised that a large portion of deaths among children stemming from common causes like diarrhoea, malaria and pneumonia could be prevented by reducing environmental risks.
Simply increasing access to safe water and clean cooking fuels, removing unsafe building materials like lead paint, and reducing the use of hazardous pesticides and chemicals could go a long way in preventing such deaths, the reports said.
A full 200,000 deaths each year among children under five due to malaria, for example, could be avoided through actions like reducing breeding sites for mosquitoes and covering drinking water storage, the WHO said.
At the same time, a range of new environmental hazards are emerging, like the ballooning piles of discarded mobile phones and other electronic and electrical waste, which is expected to hit 50 million metric tonnes globally by next year.
When not properly recycled, such waste can expose children to toxins that can lead to reduced intelligence, attention disorders, lung damage and cancer, the WHO warned.
Climate change is also taking its toll on children, the reports found.
Rising levels of carbon dioxide contributes to pollen growth, which in turn is leading to rising rates of asthma in young people, the agency said.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
How is a swimming pool a tourist attraction ? It’s surely locals of west Dublin going for a swim
The NAC isn’t just a swimming pool. It has a small water park with a few slides, lazy river, wave pool and others I’m probably forgetting.
I take your point Chris but I’m going to go ahead and agree with Tony on this one. I’m not sure this should ever class as a tourist attraction.
I wouldn’t classify it as a tourist attraction, either, to be honest. I just had to clarify that it is not just a swimming pool.
Going by that criteria why isn’t Croke Park up there. With all the matches and concerts every year attendances are in the millions.
Few countries in the world can compare for natural beauty, and for all our faults there is a decency and goodness in Irish people that can be rare to find elsewhere. Sure we are not loved throughout the world as we would like to believe, but that is our own fault because the way a minority behave abroad. We have a wonderful culture that many of us have forgotten, great music, creativity and a brand that most countries would love. And to those who have left, hopefully some day we can welcome them all back some day to a better country, to a better home with some hope for the future. We live in ana amazing country, lets enjoy it!
Many thumbs up!
I was lucky enough as a child to have a father who loved to drive. He took us all over the country. I am grateful to this day for him showing me so much of this country when I was younger.
Stop posting your link in every thread, please
The old romantic view – but we’re deluding ourselves. Our culture is as good as most, no more. And having been forced by the Christian Brothers, and the system to learn Irish (a dead language, virtually) and play Gaelic games – I have preferred and chosen other places to reside.
Just one example, the UK. Steeped in history and where O’Casey, Joyce and Wilde chose to live and work from an early age. The arts there are legendary, as is its education and sport. We tend to live in the past.
Gaelic games, for instance, are still followed avidly here – but nowhere else. Whilst soccer is played in every country on earth (c220) – with over 3.3b currently watching the World Cup. A game invented by the English.
Yes Will – I am one of ‘those who have left’ also. And have no wish to return; I, too, was forced to learn Gaelic (which I never used), attend mass (which I no longer do) and to play Gaelic games (which I stopped, ASAP.
Ireland may be a fine country – but I often wonder why so many had to be pressurised into becoming a stereotype. A fews days in Rome NYC or Venice – would be much more attractive than Dublin or Taytoland……….
There is a difference between living in the past and actually remembering or respecting it. British people tend to have complete amnesia about their history when it comes to imperialism and the slave trade. Most countries are very selective about their history, Ireland and the UK are no different.
Different countries have contibuted differently but equally to the world whether its Karaoke, Halloween, soccer or pasta. I don’t get eith these comparisons which are often inadvertedly used to fuel nationslism. No country is better or worse.
Always surprised that the Guinness storehouse comes top. It’s really not a great experience
I’m a home brewer and while Guinness is the only commercial beer I’d happily drink (Murphy’s great too but don’t live near a Murphy tap), the experience is extremely good imo.
It explains the brewing process very well and in a very accessible manner. I’ve been to the Heineken and Kronenbourg’s respective equivalents and it is very good.
Most places are more like vineyard experiences and I include Jameson in that.
I do not think it is value for money however. It is very expensive but as an attraction I think it’s well done.
It’s a money msling racket!
There’s a list to keep your kids off iPads , phones , computer games for a few weekends . Get out and enjoy what’s on offer .
*Sent from your iphone :p
So Dublin then !!!! I know thousands of other places NOT in Dublin that should replace most of what’s on that list ! There is more to IRELAND than DUBLIN !!!!
It’s based on pure visitor numbers. Dublin is by far the most visited in terms of tourists so it naturally will dominate the list.
Yeah like Cork and Kildare and Meath…oops sorry they’re already on the list!
To
The butter museum in Cork city has yet again been mistakenly passed over!
As has indeed the English Market
I think footfall in the Market would be difficult to judge.I love the place and would recommend it to anyone but trying to figure out who is local and who is a tourist is not really possible.
The National Aquatic Centre?! Really?!
What about Muckross
Been to most of them. But for me Fota Wildlife Park (if that’s want you want to call it !) was a major disappointment.
You mean the overpriced glorified “exotic” farm where all the animals are depressed off their heads, couldn’t agree more!………. Ps if anyone from Fota happens to read this for gods sake clean the water down there it’s horribly murky and full of rubbish oh and give the animals some quality of life, that poor eagle in that tiny enclosure (small cage) looks like he needs a good feed of prozac not to mention all the other poor creatures depressed off their heads, for the money your charging it shouldn’t be a problem!!!
Number 5 looks like it could be a dole que
Be nice to see the Boyne Valley up there or any of our historical monuments further afield ie outside the major cities. The convenience of the Dublin and Cork attractions is plain to see but there is no denying the breadth and variety of our attractions. Also, wasn’t that impressed with Fota Wildlife Park recently, but then again, I am comparing it to Dublin Zoo, which I love.
I would have hoped the national leprachaun museum would make the list. My favourite Dublin attrsction by far,
Too small!!! Too small!!!!
A jail – are you joking me?
No wonder Tourism Ireland has been pestering the government – for years – to invest in some new activity-based attractions.
Such as they have in most other countries in Europe – including those equivalent to the size of Ireland.
Build it, and they will come.
Im very pleased that the jail made the list. Its the one thing I always tell visitors to do when they come here.
Its well run and the tour guides are very knowledable, Im sure that alcatraz would be on the list in california.
AFAIK Tayto park got, or are in the process of planning permission for a few roller coasters.
Don’t put down Tayto… You might have a chip on your shoulder. Sic!
The cliffs of mohar are not as spectacular as I expected .. giants causeway is much more cooler
Stick on Dublin Liffey Board. All kinds of wild life there
Been too all
The “Barack Obama ” plaza will be number one next year..can’t wait
6 out of the 10 are in Dublin i don’t think so….
have your say