Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
IN THE LAST few weeks TheJournal.ie spent time with Dublin Mistress Lara Austen to find out about the life of a professional dominatrix in Ireland.
Lara provides various services to clients who enjoy bondage, dominance, submission and sadomasochism (BDSM) activities. Though she does not have sexual intercourse with her clients, there is undoubtedly a sexual element to the sessions.
Both of the clients we spoke to were married and had never told their wives of their sexual interests, or that they had been going to see the mistress for years.
Does this count as cheating? We asked two commentators on opposite sides of the debate to give their views:
As a woman in a monogamous relationship, I do not think that Lara’s clients who have failed to tell their partners are cheating.
Firstly, infidelity, or “cheating” is a violation of a couple’s assumed or stated contract as regards emotional or sexual exclusivity and commitment to one another. But, is seeking sexual catharsis automatically an infidelity? What about masturbation or the use of pornography?
Consider for a moment how much more difficult this natural drive is for people whose partners, (no matter how loving their relationship) hold fundamentally different views of what that sexual or emotional gratification should involve.
What Lara offers as a professional dominatrix is strictly not sexual in the commonly understood sense. There are no hand jobs, nudity or sexual services. It appeals to a deeper sense of sexuality in terms of fetish. Lara is a dream weaver.
In my opinion what she intends to offer to her clients is the opportunity to fulfil fantasies and “play” out their fetishes with her.
Of course, by failing to tell their partner that they are availing of this service, a different type of dishonesty is happening. This dishonesty is typified by the fact that one partner refuses to open up to the other about a certain personal aspect of themselves.
Ideally they would be on the same page about it. But if maintaining a positive relationship requires occasional, non-sexual release, in the sense that this type of release does not fall in the bracket of conventional sexual gratification, isn’t that release then a force for good?
I believe it is.
I’m baffled how somebody could manage to meet, marry and get a mortgage with another person yet fail to share the fact that they enjoy being spanked on the bottom.
Couples should work out their sexual preferences and fidelity deal breakers right from the start, because one person’s penchant for outsourcing their BDSM activities needs to be addressed before a couple progresses to the combining of bookshelves level.
Everyone is different and all couples have different boundaries; what is acceptable for one person is a breach of trust to another. But if somebody wants to explore their options, they always need to check with their partner first.
Even for the sake of marital harmony, not everybody is comfortable with hog-tying their husband and putting him in a cage with a bowl of dog food. However, they might be okay with them looking elsewhere for that particular pleasure.
Cheating is the dark shadow lurking behind any relationship. Adult love, unlike parent-child love, is conditional. Any person can decide one day that the bad stuff outweighs the good, and head out for some extra-curricular fun.
But when you’re sexually intimate with someone outside of your relationship, without your partner’s consent, it is cheating. When you strip away the fact it was a paid dominatrix that did the spanking, the person has still cheated and been disloyal to their partner and to their relationship.
Your boyfriend going back to a dominatrix’s flat, enjoying a lustful session, then going back to you like he popped out to buy some milk is not okay.
And to the men who do it then the biggest hurdle you face isn’t persuading your partner that spanking is fun but convincing her that your sex life to date has not been a total sham.
Sexual betrayal is always going to sting.
So, what do you think about it? Does going to see a dominatrix count as cheating? Take it to the comments…
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
That a 500 year leasehold was signed with a private developer in 1997, says a lot about the sad state of public planning in the city.
That’s a good news story to go to bed with. Good on Lord iveagh
@Niamh Hand: where was he the last 20 years?
@steve white: 20 years ago a still recent lease agreement was in effect, so he was as powerless to intervene as the rest of us.
@steve white: dope
@steve white: drinking pints I’d assume
Hands up if you agree that Alan Kelly is an eejit
@the-baldie-lad: utd fan out in the open was it Leo on the luas
Excellent news.
Be nice to have something along the lines of the English market in Cork
Hopefully, he won’t grant another lease to DCC so they can balls it up again!
My dad had a butchers shop there for years.
A market like the ones in Barcelona would be the job there..
Should be sequestered by the state along with all lands and properties that were divided amongst the lords of the English elite!
@D Cullen: That’d be great if the state were capable of managing the lands and properties. Read the article and you will understand that the State is not up to the job.
@D Cullen: so the state can then sell it on the ruthless developers and give themselves pay raises??
No thank, at least Lord Iveagh will do something that benefits the people of Dublin, like he has done many times in the past.
@D Cullen: except the Guinness’s are Anglo-Irish not English, just like many of Ireland’s rebel leaders of the past, Pearse / Wolfe Tone etc. The first Lord Iveagh was born is Dublin and is known for providing housing for the poor etc.
His Christian/First name is very odd, don’t you think – ‘Lord’ ??
have your say